Jump to content

MadAsHell

Members
  • Posts

    5,358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by MadAsHell

  1. Bigger fan of this then Melksham....
  2. 9th in their B&F, but I'm still not a fan. Many others I'd rather before him.
  3. Yep, Moore's on my shopping list for the off season. Could be a real valuable utility. In our 22 if you ask me.
  4. Was impressed with his output in the VFL finals. Can play deep and push up into the midfield. Could be an ideal 3rd tall forward.
  5. My understanding is that he wants to go somewhere he can be the number 1 ruck. Doggies and handbagers would have to be favourites.
  6. As i've said, with Frost coming back from injury and into the back 6 next year, i was expecting Col to go forward. If we do move him on (which i voted for) then i think we should look to replace him with someone like Karnezis.
  7. Hope Melksham stays put. Wouldn't want him for anymore then 2 years and for no more then a 3rd round pick. Bye the sounds of it, we've offered him at least 3 and Essendon want more then our 3rd rounder. Lets hope Essendon give him the extra year and that ends it all.
  8. I for one aren't quite as happy. Thought he suited our needs nicely. Still think we need someone with some pace off half back to go with Salem & Lumumba.
  9. Not named in the All Australian 22 for under 22's. Yet someone like Tom Langdon does. Please explain?
  10. Exactly what we need. Another half back with pace was one of the things i had right at the top of our shopping list along with another quality mid and a key forward/2nd ruck. Wonder what he'd cost?
  11. After Charlie Dixon, Tippett would have to be the next best forward/2nd ruck option out there. Given we no doubt have hopes of climbing tbe ladder, i wouldn't be against trading Watts and next years 1st round pick with us only paying 500K of the last year of Tippett's current contract. We then just have to move Dawes onto one of Carlton, Essendon or Brisbane.
  12. Gorringe and Prestia?
  13. Maybe Viney's meeting with Clayton was in relation to Hall? Would be very happy to have him.
  14. Will be interesting to see what happens here. As i've said previously, if Col were to stay, i think one of he or Dunn would have to move forward in order to allow Frost to come into our backline. If Col does walk, I can see us chasing someone like Karnezis. I voted go, but wont be bothered either way to be honest as long as we get at least band 3 for him.
  15. I was very keen on Mason in his draft year, but knew we didn't have the draft pick to land him. Didn't know he was capable in the ruck, but if so i'd be more into him then Walker.
  16. Hope for your sake the rumors of us looking at him aren't true then.
  17. Not as yet. I expect him to be upgraded and signed till the end of 2017.
  18. At least we managed to win an elimination final in 2006.
  19. If you were Richmond board, you'd have to look at Hardwick's contract wouldn't you? Three elimination final losses in a row. Wasting their window, if you would be so bold as to say they're currently in a window?
  20. Now I really don't like North Melbourne at all, and if they win today I hope Sydney smash them. But gee it will be funny if Richmond loose today!
  21. To not back himself in from there and instead handball to a guy surrounded by 4 Tigers players is concerning, I remember when Jacobs was up for trade from Port, I was keen on us getting him. Very glad we didn't.
  22. True, but only if that were the club they nominated and we then match the contract offer put to them by that club, Is yet to happen since they introduced free agency. Thought Hawthorn may with Buddy, but didn't happen.
  23. Who was the weak North player that wasn't confident enough to take a set shot 40m out directly in front, so hand balled to Boomer which cost them a goal?
  24. Given Suckling's a free agent, they can't even offer them him. Maybe Frawley? Haha. Again, Garland's a free agent, so we can't trade him.
  25. The word [censored] is censored! I'm sorry but that's absurd! So I can't even use the saying flogging a dead horse with censorship.... Oh ok, so flogging good, but [censored] (reduced to 4 letters) bad! Edit: Flogging not censored.
×
×
  • Create New...