Sir Why You Little

For starters it was a minimum of 13 overs to be bowled in that match Rhino. I heard at least 3 different reports late last night, so unless 3 journalists were wrong... You keep bringing up 4 corners RR, glad you like the ABC, but please do not think that is the only source of information in regard to sub continent corruption that i have heard, as i mentioned here yesterday my father spent a lot of time in india so i have taken an interest in the craziness of india for a long time. With the 4 corners program i was more aghast at the Pakistan official who blatantly lied down the camera. i knew well of Bookmakers, four corners just showed that nobody really wants to fix it. That was news. If i wish to Bag Hilditch i will, the guy lives in an ivory tower-the fruits of which are now showing, but his interview the other morning was quite astounding.

You Guys are just too soft. These proffessional cricketers have a good life, and if they lose a series there is always another one next week. The Focus is now longevity and not winning. Did you hear Hilditch on the radio the other morning?? Spoke with almost disdain. The guy lives in another world...

Its going to be a long summer, but the aussie cricketers are all over paid, so sadly no one is going to really hurt. Should be Ponting's last series if he doesn't score well. I did say "should be" B)

Not with 13 Minimum overs to go. That is too early and conservative to pull the plug on a game. Nobody improves without taking even a small risk.

Fair Go Rhino..They had Minimum 13 overs to face-If the Team had the Balls they should have had a go at winning. Glad you were not ever a captain of any team i was on. I always play to win, and it would have helped the Paki's case to get more legitimate pay packets if they had pulled off a classic win. You can't always hide inside the womb and take the easy option.

Who said Test Cricket was ever easy. Stop making excuses for the walk. The Paki's were on the Home straight after doing a lot of hard work. They should have had a crack at winning, otherwise do not bother playing at all.

NO NO NO that is wrong. If the Paki's had had a crack at winning that game last night, they would have rebuilt a lot of respect. nobody would have said anything about "tossing a game" at all, if they had got even close to 400. The had Wickets in hand and 13 overs Minimum to bowl. Should have gone for the win. Naive indeed.

They should have gone for the win....They had enough overs. Imagine what it would have done for cricket if they had pulled it off-as is said in the report. 2 sixes were hit before they walked. So the pitch could not have been that bad. Poor Form IMO

Pakistan's effort yesterday against South Africa...Kind of sums it all up for international cricket really doesn't it. "Let's not go for the runs in case we get Bowled out & then everybody will think we were on the take-Lets just walk off with 13 overs to go & take the draw" Not worth playing the game with that attitude me thinks.... B)

What???? That is appalling, Doherty was the bright spark of wednesday's game. Who you know. Time to drop Hilditch IMO. The Australian Public is not stupid, and they can smell double standards.

The Bowling after you left home was atrocious. Not one yorker was bowled. It was a joke. I don't think all is happy in the australian side. Mitchell Johnson bowling pies with a smile on his face, it is not right. The Sri Lankan supporters outnumbered us at the MCG!!!! But then who knew it was on until i turned the TV on. Meanwhile Merv is sacked, while the faceless Hilditch keeps his part time job. Dark Times indeed.

Long Summer me thinks. We have no captains. Clarke is a good bloke, not a captain.

Sure, but it can still get a lot worse-and i think it will. And that is just plain sad & irresponsible when prime examples were shown via that videotape evidence, and ICC representatives are able to just Fob it all off, while looking straight down the Lens of the Camera!! Astounding.

Doesn't look good for the Future does it, 4 Corners don't muck about like a Tabloid Current Affairs story would. Cricket is going to be in serious trouble within the next decade.

Yes i think the ICC will do well to Get Tough, otherwise the Sport is in severe danger on the world stage.

Tonight's edition of 4 Corners certainly puts the issue of World Cricket in a Bad way, as far as integrity is concerned. Match Fixing allegations that the ICC do not really want to act on so far. If you missed the Episode i strongly suggest you watch it this week. Troubled Times sadly.

Maybe i am from the milky way HT i definately don't come from the same planet as the Australian Selectors, and for that i am proud.. Brad Hodge still Rocks, but sadly his address is Victorian.

Whiteboard Wednesday has been a revelation to me, You may have already known about a lot of those inner workings- i was not. Particularly the episode on list management. That is the type of transparency i am talking about. Supporters feel way more involved now. You can even read it on here. My Dad who is 75 next week loves getting Text messages from Stynesy. Cam Schwab Twitters it all helps. The ACB selectors are in a Dark cave compared to this. It's just an observation i have been really impressed with over the last 3 years. Let me say this. I really hope the Aussies fire up over summer. I want them to play well, but right now there doesn't seem a lot of direction, if i am wrong i am sure you and others her will tell me!! B)

RR you and i must come from different planets i think, If you don't believe the MFC has become more Transparent & open with its members since the new board took over, than before then we obviously follow different Teams. I would prefer the ACB do the same type of thing, But it's just my opinion. If the Cricket over this coming summer is anything like what we saw this week, then i & many others i suspect will not watch, as i would prefer to enjoy my summer than be [censored] off. Ch 9 must be a tad worried as they have scheduled a lot of air time to cricket, & if the Poms start thrashing us, they will lose wheelbarrows of cash. So it may be in the ACB's interests to be a little more open. Let us see. Btw. i am well aware of who & what John Benaud is....but i will keep an eye out for the book, could be a very interesting read. Sportsbooks in the city have it, do you know??

I agree that timing is everything in terms of when positions become available. Hodgey was stiff, but was still disguarded very quickly (Jamie Siddons was even more stiff with his timing) What gets up my Cruits is that some players are given a lot more time to flourish than others? Thus my Selectors being more transparent comment. Tell the Cricket loving public what the long term plans are so that we can all understand the logic of decisions. It is something that the MFC have done really well, we can still crack it from time to time, but yes we know and understand the long term Template. Cricket lags badly in this dept.

What you write above RR is no more than your own opinion, once again & not the Gospel. Unless of course you are an ACB selector yourelf, and therefore happy to protect your own position!! B) Michael Hussey has always had mental toughness yes, hence the name Mr Cricket-but that does not mean he is immune from retirement when the time is right. Totally separate situation there RR You say above Hauritz is not good enough, but because there is no ready made replacement he should keep his baggy green. Is that the fault of 20/20 rubbish or has sheffield shield stocks fallen away?? Because i haven't thought Hauritz is up to it for quite a while. Not a good outlook for the country is it. Pakistan have these problems because their country is stuffed, Australia is not in that position. Say what you like about the Golden Contracts, i still do not agree with the concept of creating Fat Cats. Not healthy in the long term.

I use Hodge as an example of a cricketer who was never given nearly as much chance to prove himself as others have been. I never said Hodge should be used now RR. His time has passed sadly.

Fair call, but does it give it give Hauritz the right to play this summer? I don't think so, but he may well do so because there is not enough time to make a replacement. Does that mean the selectors have been doing their job Fully?? It is a tough call 50/50 I think the biggest problem the ACB has is the Handing out of the "Golden 25 Contracts" (i think its 25) I do not agree with that at all. That just causes to big a gap between those that do & those that don't have. It also gives the Golden few the chance to lose that edge & get away with it IMO. It's the same philosophy as a long AFL contract eg 5 years. I don't like them as too many things can change in that time. 1-3 year contracts i favour. You play well you get rewarded. I think in some ways we are seeing the ACB backed into a corner of it's own making, and the results are the current Test Team. I have never liked the Golden Contracts concept, Each player should be able to make a claim for a spot on form and mental toughness, and not so much on a long term Handshake to the lucky few.

I am sure they do 45-Far more than i have, and i wish they would take a few more risks, that is just it. The Bowling of Hauritz on the last day just gone, could not have been worse than someone else, but he keeps getting a game.! Why? Imagine if Donald Cockatoo Collins was played for MFC week after week just on the off chance he would produce a "Blinder"....The Selectors would be lynched by the members. What is the difference with the Cricket selectors?

Cameron White should be in the side, i have already mentioned him, but of course he is a victorian!! silly me. I used G S Chappell as an example only (Big Changes have been made-Not) Hilditch deserves to face the media no doubt, He is protected species for sure on a good (part time) wage!! Lets see how G.S. Chappell goes in the next few weeks, as he came from the Australian Cricket Academy he should have good information on the young players around the country. It is a better option than playing the 3 "list Cloggers"