Jump to content

daisycutter

Life Member
  • Posts

    29,527
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

Everything posted by daisycutter

  1. Put it another way --- Viney + Hogan + Barry = 3 + 14 + 27 --- not so bad There was a "deal" done you know
  2. sad.......but true
  3. these guys are 22,23 and 22. they could get contracts playing basketball outside the us on reasonable coin they wouldn't want to settle for the basic low wage paid to 18 yo rookies that's why i think they would expect more and why it could be expensive as these guys could be pushing 25 before (if) they were ready for afl just how i see it
  4. Might be expensive. I don't think those American guys would stay for AFL rookie wages Just saying
  5. can't see any point keeping couch + magner couch to go for mine
  6. article in age today re afl commissioners by caro multiple bummer supporters not one demon supporter
  7. Not quite. They can still have 6 but then 38 on list. With min 4 they can have 40 on list. So bit of ducks and drakes really.
  8. haven't seen much of the former rj. maybe i'm hard to please
  9. no. based on how they did the compos we would have got 49 + 50 instead of 49 therefore effectively 50 for byrnes was ok nothing worth crying over here
  10. He's attending one of those fancy rehabilitation centres in the US at great cost He has to be thoroughly de-contaminated of all the filth before he can rock up to aami stadium
  11. exactly - RFA, UFA and now SFA
  12. probably would just mean pick 49 + 50 (ie two band 5's) so really no big deal
  13. you'd like to think it occurred whilst looking at your avatar wouldn't you? Sorry to disappoint you.
  14. So that's Band 5 isn't it? Worst possible outcome. FMD spewing is correct
  15. now the waiting begins................
  16. you're a bit slow today dee-luded. see GTG's post #10
  17. What time tonight can we expect afl to announce compo picks?
  18. i think(?) the change is just to the minimum not maximum
  19. medicine taken, but now you are a spelling nazi of record with a standard to uphold B)
  20. i can envisage situations where you (should) get more picks than net player loss\ e.g. lose 2 x band1 players and gain one band5 player should equal 1 x band1 + 1 band2or3or?
  21. We'll find out shortly, but I think we will get one pick because we lost one net player The band will be determined by points taking all the three players into account
  22. oooops, even i make a blooper sometimes self flagellation to commence in 5 seconds
  23. Just to be a devil's advocate..... Why wouldn't it be Byrnes - Rivers = xxxxxxxxx and Maloney = yyyyyyyy You'd get different bands this way I'd guess
  24. You call that harsh? Sheesh and you reckon i got up on the wrong side of the bed. thin-skinned?
  25. martin got his tatts after the ND (I think) so there is still time
×
×
  • Create New...