was only making the point of why he was being questioned in the first place. He wasn't playing football and not allowed any sporting contact with clubs, so why couldn't he bet on afl (which he didn't)
of course he should not have misled them, but why being questioned in the first place? That was all I was alluding to
it was from last year whilst under the "essendon" suspension
they were under a non contact suspension and not playing, so even if he had bet on afl (which they said he didn't) it hard to see what the fuss is
i think someone has combined something nate said 2 weeks ago when jessie got suspended with something he said this week, giving a different (false) context
old journo trick
a reason why you may see different "quality" of fhd broadcasts is that fta stations broadcast using data compression algorithms which they can vary from time to time. the fta stations now support multiple channels within a fixed bandwidth. depending on the sum of the required resolution total they will use either a heavy or light compression algorithm.
another variable is that some of what you think (and your tv info panel says) is fhd (1080i) is actually something that the tv station has just upscaled. upscaling doesn't give you the same quality as what you are upscaling to
being a fwd it probably has to be hannan i like hannan but he's had his taste and showed a few tricks. he'll get another chance soon
the other reason re pedo is it will avoid wattsy getting mauled as relief ruck
well dazzle, we need a chf and a ff. jack watts is neither. so it's hogan and pedo for me. that is, if we are picking teams to win rather than develop
in: hogan, pedo, hibberd
out: weideman, ????, melksham