Kolt 39

Nothing yet he is one of the players in limbo as remains unsigned UFA was reports back in August he would walk from MFC though.

Yes absolutely an option. Will be interesting to see if JT prefers 5 and 9 or if prefers to get higher up to secure a certain player he prefers over others and gain an additional later pick inside 25. 3 x top 25 instead of 2 x top 10. Either way I back in the decision they make and look forward to next season.

We have lost 8 players from the 2024 list. Gus, ANB, Hunter, Schache, Smith, B.Brown, Tomlinson and Farris-White. Even if we pick up a couple Rookie/PSD's need around 4- 5 more from trade / draft. As an example I can see them possibly trading with GWS to split pick 9 across 15 and 21 and Derksen as a play. And then on trading 5 and one of 15 or 21 to secure 2 and 25. Then MFC have 2, 21, 25 for instance to go along with Sharp and Derksen. Just an example but something suggests Cal Twomey expecting MFC hasn't finished trying to move up draft board further. Also we have Campbell so 7 spots left now

Not obsessed at all, was a comment mentioning what JT and Lamb have previously tried to do. I'm fine with whatever they decide is best. The draft this year is a lot deeper than a lot of prior drafts that is very well known by anyone that follows U18's. Purely if JT believes there is a standout which he may or may not then wouldn't rule it out that MFC trade up as high as they can.

We have a history of continuing to trade up as high as possible, so IF we did secure GC 13. I wouldn't rule that out being on traded with pick 5 to North for 2 and 25 maybe something else later or pick swaps. If there is a player Taylor rates as a must get then we are likely to continue to push up the order. North communicated early in draft period happy to trade back just a few spots and something else for thier pick 2, with 5 & 13 we could do that. Yes It's a very even draft however we offered the Windsor and Kolt picks for the Hawks Watson pick last year. And also tried for Bailey Humphrey his draft year. The top few players will eventually separate as they always do and our pick 5 might not secure Taylor's first choice.

6 Rivers 5 Langdon 4 Mcvee 3 ANB 2 May 1 Pickett

6 Rivers 5 JVR 4 Windsor 3 TMac 2 Pickett 1 Langdon

6 Viney lead from the front played a great game 5 Pickett always clean & high impact 4 Van Rooyen competed well, plenty of upside 3 Oliver played best game in a while missing burst and polish still 2 Rivers stayed in the contest, with more midfield time will continue to improve still has upside 1 Gawn edged Mcinerny in a good battle to provide 1st option to mids especially 1st half

6 Viney 5 Rivers 4 May 3 Gawn 2 Langdon 1 ANB

6 Gawn 5 Salem 4 ANB 3 Viney 2 T Mac 1 Petracca

6 Lever 5 Oliver 4 May 3 Langdon 2 Gawn 1 Windsor

6 Gawn 5 May 4 Lever 3 Langdon 2 Turner 1 Pickett

6 Petracca 5 Gawn 4 May 3 Mcvee 2 Viney 1 Sparrow