Bowserpower

Maybe they thought it could be detrimental to the negotiation process? I don't know, still no reason to attack. That goes for both sides.

Well I can only comment on the original interpretation that I meant.

Exactly. However popularity should be taken out of it. I wouldn't say that the poster didn't agree either, they said they found it hard to believe and were happy to be proven wrong. Was it really that bad?

Who is being an ahole? I personally don't see an issue but why can't someone say that they find something hard to believe and why on earth would they be banned for it?

Sure, but why shout down someone because their opinion is unpopular?

I'm sorry but this is extreme and the language used here and on other posts is just over the top. Does freedom of speech exist anymore without a forum pile on every time?

It might have something to do with the fact that they've only been here for 2 seconds.

Except we sort of have to!

1. Windsor 2. Langford 3. Lindsay 4. Kolt

I don't think anyone knows what they're talking about. Who cares if he's a good defender at Under 16s level.

Can he actually play? Has he shown enough to suggest he's like Sam Darcy at a similar age?

Well we need to be prepared for it

All I did was ask a question.

What if the academy kids are better?

I've also noticed you often use the laugh symbol when you've completely lost an argument but want to maintain some kind of social status on here. Now that is actually funny!