stevethemanjordan

Disagree. Let's leave it at that.

That was one of several-hundred.

How about Aish/Toumpas/Morton for a knockout combo?

Bont without question

Nobody is the same. However, as our list stands right now, Tyson is the least versatile of all our mids and his inside work is hardly far and away better than any of Brayshaw, Viney, Jones, Petracca and Oliver. He may be more valuable once Jones retires. But Kelly would be of greater value to us going into the 2017 season. Nobody at our club possesses the running power or class of Kelly. (Hunt has the pace, not the endurance).

The trade was great for us at the time and was a no-brainer. But as our list stands right now, I'd have Kelly over Tyson. Kelly possesses attributes that our midfield sorely lack. And as good as Tyson is inside, we have a plethora of mids who are super strong inside. Would be a dream if were to land him. But I can't see him moving back home anytime soon.

Dat font tho...

[censored] Essendon

Good call, I've like some of his work this year. Reminds me a bit of Jake Lever in his build. Would happily rookie him.

If we see Garland traded this year, that has surely got to be the biggest fall from grace I've seen from any individual on the back of a three year extension deal. It's a real concern. Him and Dunn. I don't get it.

Post more please.

Here's an idea. Everyone shut the fark up about Heffernan on the Hibberd thread. Best.

[censored] Essendon. I hope we standup and play hardball on this one with Hibberd. I want the MFC to be the club that dictates the play. Too many times have I seen us be bullied by stronger clubs like Essendon. Makes me sick to the stomach.

Edit: Deleted my post as I realised a few of those players were rookie upgrades as people have already pointed out. Shiet.

I know he has said all of that. But I couldn't in my wildest dreams ever see someone like Fyfe leave Freo. He just doesn't seem like the kind of guy to leave. Unless of course he had a fall-out with the club.

No idea what's going on within the club in regards to Dunn and the refusal to pick him on the back of playing well at VFL level and also on the back of two average games from O-Mac. I feel annoyed and frustrated that Roos hasn't come out and said anything about what it is Dunn needs work on. You hear about it when others get dropped. Garland, Watts etc.. As a member and supporter of the club, I think it's important we know what's going on when things of this nature occur. Especially given that it has now been several weeks that he has been overlooked. The selection of Frost ahead of Dunn has me even more dumbfounded given that Roos has yet again owned up to 'not having made enough changes' as well as admitting a 'lack of experience' in his boring post-match presser. Considering Garland, (our most experienced defender) is out with injury, one would think Dunn would be a direct replacement given the like-for-like experience and also Dunn's VFL form. (Which is again something I consistently hear from Roos). What msg is this sending Dunn? At this point of the season, I'm just genuinely confused and irritated by what Roos says during pressers and especially post-match interviews. I value the guy highly and believe he has done much of the steering of the ship over the last couple of years in regards to the state of the club. But as to game-day selection, tactical and strategic implementation during games and game planning in general, I have to say I believe that like Malthouse, Roos' time as a modern day AFL gameday coach is up. I've heard contradicting statements game after game during this season and the general theme after losses appears to be, 'we could have done this or that better at the selection table'. It's not good enough. It's actually pathetic. This week we have a backline of O-Mac (who is just way out of his depth and is in poor form), Frost (who is an athlete and has literally played two VFL games in defence) and T-Mac who has had a very inconsistent year. Is Roos trying to make a mockery of our chances at winning? Even if our midfield break-even, watch the ease at which Hawthorn's forwards score goals in our defensive 50 thanks to going with inexperience and bad form over experience and good form. It's almost as if I'd written and posted in a losing formula to Roos and he has gone with it.

Generally a really smart and good field kick for a KP player, is Jesse. Which is a handy attribute for a CHF to have. As soon as the Weed is ready, I'm sure we'll see the move made.

Quite the contrary, OD.

Ban him mods. Ban him.

You'd think so. I think it's clear Hogan's attributes and strengths suggest he is a traditional CHF. Weideman is a goal square FF. Watts to play third tall.

Possibly robbed him from a rising star nom also. Was a joke of a decision. Trac-man is showing the signs we all thought he would show. So exciting. As soon as he realises he doesn't have to play on at every opportunity, the better. No doubts about him though. A player you want in finals.

That's a significant drop in price and I'm not certain he'd take it.

Yeh but his 'technique' hasn't changed from last year to this. So where's the argument going? I didn't hear anything when he kicked 7.1 against St Kilda. Daisy refuses to detail what part of his technique it is that is 'flawed'. And everyone else just seems to say that it looks awkward. Which it does. But again, of what significance is that if last year he had exactly the same technique but was kicking more accurately?

I'm yet to hear what it is about his technique that contributes to his inaccuracy from you. Solid. You've made absolutely no point.

Well wtf are you arguing/whinging about ? The only thing it's potentially inhibiting is his distance. Have you checked the bloke's accuracy? What is it about his 'flawed' action do you see that needs changing? Do you understand that the last few steps he takes before hitting the ball are fine and his ball-drop is generally fine? And that that's the most important part of his 'technique' and kicking a football in general. What you're basically saying is that the before bits like his stutter steps etc are contributing to his inaccuracy? Is that right? How can you argue such a thing when to date, he has been pretty damn accurate with the exception of a few 'off' days. What are you arguing mate?