Whether it's NASA's top dogs James Hansen, Gavin Schmidt from realclimate.org, or the American Meteorological Society, they are highly paid climate alarmists.
"Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist Dr. John S. Theon, one of the former supervisors of Hansen, has now publicly declared himself a skeptic and declared that Hansen âembarrassed NASAâ with his alarming climate claims and said Hansen was âwas never muzzled.â
Theon was elected a fellow of the American Meteorological Society, given the NASA Exceptional Performance Award twice, elected an Associate Fellow of the American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics, and awarded the AIAA's Losey Medal for contributions to airborne remote sensing.
Dr. William Gray
In a February 7, 2009 essay titled âOn The Hijacking of the American Meteorological Societyâ, Gray wrote:
I am appalled at the selection of James Hansen as this yearâs recipient of the AMSâs highest award - the Rossby Research Medal.
The American Meteorological Society (AMS) was founded in 1919 as an organization dedicated to advancing scientific knowledge of weather and climate. It has been a wonderful beacon for fostering new understanding of how the atmosphere and oceans function. But this strong positive image is now becoming tarnished as a result of the AMS leadershipâs capitulating to the lobby of the climate modelers and to the outside environmental and political pressure groups who wish to use the now AMS position on AGW to help justify the promotion of their own special interests. The effectiveness of the AMS as an objective scientific organization has been greatly compromised.
Award-winning NASA Astronaut and Physicist Walter Cunningham of NASAâs Apollo 7 also recently chastised Hansen. âHansen is a political activist who spreads fear even when NASAâs own data contradict him,â Cunningham wrote in an essay in the July/August 2008 issue of Launch Magazine. âNASA should be at the forefront in the collection of scientific evidence and debunking the current hysteria over human-caused, or Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Unfortunately, it is becoming just another agency caught up in the politics of global warming, or worse, politicized science,â Cunningham wrote.
Retired meteorologist Craig James, an AMS member, wrote a scathing commentary about Hansen. "I believe Dr. Hansen's political ideology has taken over his science and renders him no longer qualified to be the keeper of the global temperature data," James wrote on January 15, 2009.
In June of 2008, Dr. Nicholas Drapela of the faculty of Oregon State University Chemistry Department expressed his outrage at Hansen and referred to him as âan apocalyptic prophet.â
âMy dear colleague Professor Hansen, I believe, has finally gone off the deep end. When you have dedicated the bulk of your career to a cause, and it turns out the cause has been proven false, most people cannot bring themselves to admit the truth,â Drapela wrote on April 21, 2008. Drapela wrote that Hansenâs recent claims âcontain neither reason nor truth when compared to the volumes of daily literature being published in scientific journals today on climate change. It is not difficult to refute the words of Professor Hansen. On the contrary, one feels it is almost unfair.â âThe global warming âtime bombâ, the âpresent, dangerous situationâ, âthe perfect stormâ, âglobal cataclysmâ, âdisastrous climate changes that spiral dynamically out of humanity's control.â These are the words of an apocalyptic prophet, not a rational scientist,â Drapela added.
Meteorologist Joe DâAleo also launched a sharply worded critique of RealClimate.org in January 2009 titled âResponse to Gavin Schmidt â Global Data Base Issues Are Real.â
âTo Gavin [Schmidt] and the other alarmists, it appears, a piece that is fair and balanced can make no mention of any other opinion except that carbon dioxide is causing global warming and action is needed now and will deliver gain and no pain, something the one sided media coverage has gotten them used to over the years,â DâAleo wrote on January 13, 2009. DâAleo served as the first Director of Meteorology at The Weather Channel and served as chairman of the American Meteorological Society's Committee on Weather Analysis and Forecasting.
Atmospheric Physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh, also critiqued RealClimate.org on June 24, 2008. Peden wrote, ââReal Climateâ is a staged and contracted production, which wasn't created by âscientists,â it was actually created by Environmental Media Services, a company which specializes in spreading environmental junk science on behalf of numerous clients who stand to financially benefit from scare tactics through environmental fear mongering.â
Israeli Astrophysicist Nir Shaviv has also been critical. âThe aim of RealClimate.org is not to engage a sincere scientific debate. Their aim is to post a reply full of a straw man so their supporters can claim that your point âhas been refuted by real scientists at RealClimate.org,ââ Shavivâs website reported. Shaviv, who calls the website âWishfulclimate.org,â noted that the âwriters (at RealClimaet.org) try again and again to concoct what appears to be deep critiques against skeptic arguments, but end up doing a very shallow job.
Jara, I could go on and on and on. And I will.
The organisations you get your climate porn from are paid alarmists who falsify data and are presently relying on flawed weather surface stations where they manipulate data. They don't much like satellite data that has shown a 19 year "pause" in warming.
But I can't help you, Jara. You're too far gone. Sad.