Demonland

Now THAT'S a MEGA TRADE @Roost it far

DEMON ‘SET TO LEAVE’ AS POSSIBLE DESTINATION PRESENTS Melbourne key defender Adam Tomlinson is expected to call it quits with the Demons this year amid a lack of chances at senior level, according to SEN reporter Sam Edmund. Tomlinson, who played a key role in the club’s 2021 dominance before missing out on its premiership due to injury, holds unrestricted free agent rights this off-season. The 31-year-old has played a combined 32 AFL games in the past four seasons, and he hasn’t played more than 13 senior games in a season since 2019. Edmund floated a rival Victorian club as a possible landing spot this October. “(He is) set to leave Melbourne as an unrestricted free agent,” Edmund told SEN. “(He) wants more opportunity ... Is St Kilda the home as his third club?” With in-demand defender Josh Battle widely anticipated to depart Moorabbin for Hawthorn this off-season, adding Tomlinson as further depth behind All-Australian Cal Wilkie and Dougal Howard could be wise.

Jamie Elliot and Adam Cerra very nervous now apparently

Here we go

Still Deliberating and they still have the Owies Case.

Days Since Last Finals Win.

The life of a Dees fan ...

Might be handy for the baking stuff. I'll see myself out.

Christian Petracca could force a trade away from Melbourne via the AFL’s grievance tribunal The Herald Sun can reveal there is a process through the AFL’s collective bargaining agreement where he could ask the AFL to step in to broker a trade through mediation if all attempts to convince the Demons he wants a new start fail. The grievance tribunal is the nuclear option and has never been used before but is detailed in the AFL’s collective bargaining agreement. The AFLPA is aware of the grievance tribunal, with some player agents in the league believing Petracca would have a case given the list of issues he has with the Demons. The first option for Petracca would be opening up on his reasons for a trade - redacted various issues -which could help force the club’s hand.

Only 7 years until the 10 year reunion.

But they have ...

Someone posted this earlier in the thread about Trac but it equally applies to all of us.

I typically prefer to address issues privately, but this situation requires a public response. Both of you have repeatedly shared information or implied details that I have explicitly asked to remain confidential. Let me be clear: If this happens again, it will result in a permanent ban from this platform. This is not a warning to be taken lightly. While you may feel that your actions are protected by the anonymity of the internet, I do not have that same luxury. The rules I've established are in place for a reason—to ensure we can continue to have meaningful and important discussions about our club. By disregarding these guidelines, you are not only putting me at risk but also jeopardizing the integrity of our community. I do not wish to resort to banning anyone, but I will not hesitate to do so if it means protecting myself and this forum from potential legal consequences. Your need to prove a point does not outweigh the responsibility I have to ensure that this space remains safe and compliant with all relevant regulations. Furthermore, if necessary, I will have no hesitation in providing your IP addresses to the appropriate authorities if requested. Consider this your final notice. I value the contributions each of you brings to our discussions, but I will not tolerate any further violations. I will reiterate ... It’s important to recognise that not everyone is a public figure, and publicly naming or blaming such individuals in situations where there is no clear or concrete evidence of their responsibility is both unfair and irresponsible. Such actions can cause unwarranted harm and can contribute to spreading misinformation. It’s crucial to be aware that the responses and discussions this could potentially generates could lead to a harmful pile-on effect. This kind of collective criticism, especially when directed at private individuals, can be deeply problematic and potentially damaging both to the person in question and to this community. Due to the sensitive and private nature of certain issues surrounding the club, we have implemented moderation protocols that require specific words or phrases to undergo approval before being published. This measure is essential to protect the individuals involved, those who post comments, and the integrity of this website. Please be aware that if your posts contain any of these moderated terms, they may either be subject to review or not published at all, regardless of the rest of the content within the post. Unfortunately, the site’s software does not notify users of the specific word or phrase that triggered the moderation, which I understand can be confusing. I apologise for any inconvenience this may cause. However, these steps are taken to ensure a safe and responsible environment that protects our community and its users. We appreciate your understanding and cooperation in helping us maintain a respectful and secure space for everyone including the people that are being written about. If you attempt to get around the auto moderation. You will be banned.