Jump to content

THE TRADING CHRONICLES: DAY FIVE

Featured Replies

Posted

THE TRADING CHRONICLES: DAY FIVE

THE BIG FIZZER by The Oracle

With the world's financial crisis completely overshadowing events, football's own exchange period was always going to pale into insignificance against a backdrop of confusion and crisis on global markets. The week's activities however, produced even less result than most of us thought with only six player trades completed and not a single player of any note changing clubs.

It was not for lack of trying among the clubs that the output was so poor. For every completed trade there were probably at least ten names bandied about during the lead up and the week of trading but there were factors at play that influenced the market. These included economic factors and the gloomy economic outlook, the high price tags some managers put on their players, the perception that this year's draft pool was strong and deep and the imminent changes to the draft, particularly those that will apply with the imminent inclusion of teams from the Gold Coast and West Sydney. Clubs valued their draft picks more than ever this year and many deals that might have been consummated in other years simply were left on the shelf.

The highest draft pick to change hands was # 24 as part of the final day deal that saw Robert Warnock move from Fremantle to Carlton. It would be safe to say that this would have been Warnock was the most expensive player to be traded for a selection outside the top 20 but more of that later. Other trades yesterday involved Bulldog Farren Ray joining the Saints in a trade that saw picks 31 and 48 rotated between the clubs and Brent Prismall moved to the Bombers for draft pick # 93. The draft took on a ridiculous face with Brisbane's gift of Anthony Corrie to Collingwood for selection 93 (I wonder who they have in mind to use that one on) and the Pies offloaded the troublesome Rhyce Shaw for an exchange of insignificant draft picks.

From Melbourne's point of view, the club worked hard but failed to secure Warnock and Prismall and Brad Green stayed put and finally signed a new three year deal. The so-called "failure" to convince the Docker giant and the injured Cat, who were fringe players at best at their former clubs, is no disaster and probably a blessing in disguise for the club which can now concentrate on the forthcoming National Draft where it has three selections in the top twenty and possibly, on the Pre Season Draft (but I wouldn't be holding my breath over that one).

The PSD already promises to be as big a fizzer as the exchange period – all of which spells the likelihood of a strong push towards free agency to protect the interests of the uncontracted player. From Melbourne’s point of view, it is to be hoped that the club embraces the changes that will come and that it won’t shy away from taking the lead in aggressive trading in future years. For this year however, it was a time best to stay away from the major trades and the results of the week prove that conclusively.

Missing out on Warnock was no big deal. Carlton came in with such a knockout offer to the young ruckman who has 21 games of AFL experience under his belt that he was virtually priced out of dealing with any other club. The Blues applied the Pythagoras theory of bidding for this player. When early suitors Richmond and Melbourne came in with reported offers of around $900,000 for three years, they added a year to the contract, squared the number four to get 16 and added the requisite number of naughts to come up with figure so ridiculous for a ruckman in the current era that it would have been irresponsible of the other clubs to match. On the very day when the current Gordon Gekkos of this world were getting their comeuppance across the globe you could rely on Carlton to promote the culture of greed to the nth degree.

As for Prismall, it would have been dangerous for a club like Melbourne to have taken the risk on an injury ravaged player of such inconsequence and pay the amount the Bombers finally coughed up for him. Essendon also had a tough 2008 on the injury front. At least the price they paid for their new disabled wingman was cheap at selection # 39.

And so we move on into the brave new world. There are only six weeks to go before the National Draft, following which we might all be better placed to reflect on whether it was better to hold on to that valuable commodity – a top twenty draft pick.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 98 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies