Little Goffy

10 hours ago, Demonstone said:

Well, it's half-time in the football and the umpires have a handy two goal lead.

In better news, the persistence of @Little Goffy has paid off and he is the first to solve the teaser.

For his efforts, LG has the honour of composing the wording on the MFC Cheer Squad banner vs any team of his choice. (Keep it nice, mate)

I'm thinking, alright? I used up all my brainjuice on the dozen guesses at the quiz.

Might go for the basic taunt, something like just the counter of 'Days since Essendon won a final', or a list of our players who weren't yet born at the time Essendon won a final.

Or maybe my personal football catchphrase, "Collingwood is a liability to Australian Football."

Or something intellectual but menacing sounding, harking back to the burst of latin earlier, and also a famous catchphrase, "Hawthorn delenda est".

But none of that is especially creative. My only really creative effort with football taunts is a totally unusable rework of the Western Bulldogs song; "Sons of incest". Fortunately only fragments remain in memory.

We've done it. We've finally reached a moment of women's football triumph so intense Ghosty is too absorbed in the moment to post on here.

I've got it!

Their photos all produce wild AI hallucinations which completely misidentify them!

18 minutes ago, Previously known as LITD. said:

We better be paying him Didley because he's 30 before next season starts and a quick perusal of his stats, show a nice clear and concise linear decline in all fields.

I think especially for a mid ...25 is the prime so there's that.

It's got a fair bit of the Billings about it but I really, really hope I'm wrong.

Stats though, don't usually lie.

Acknowledging the point that Steele has for a few seasons been well down on his terrific 2020-24 peak, I'd point to the brighter side that his clearance and tackle count have stayed stable. He also has surprisingly good disposal efficiency and low turnover count consider the often contested space he works in.

If he is played realistically to the role he is best for and which we most need him for - the hard working, defense oriented inside mid - then we will get great service from him and it'll be of disproportionate value for our younger and mostly lighter-bodied mids.

Steele was truly great a few years ago and can be very good for a few more years yet.

That's well ahead of both Didley and Billings!

I do wonder, on how many club's forums there would be threads that prompt me to read Jabberwocky?

7 hours ago, Go Ds said:

Navis mea anguillis plena est. Gratias ago pro laude; mihi ipsi providere conor. Rex novus Melburniae est.

I'm sorry to hear about your unpleasant medical condition. Have to tried eating fertilised sparrow eggs?

Does all this make 2026 or 2025 anno rex primum? Oh noooooo, it's the millenial date debate all over again!

1 hour ago, Ghostwriter said:

It’s 8:33am and they’re already out there!

Ima hafta

55 minutes ago, Cranky Franky said:

??? Please translate.

28 minutes ago, Go Ds said:

You tryna be funny? Surely you can see it means 'I'm going to have to .... "

"Carpe diem, Illud virum pulchrum nunc amplecti debeo."

Unacceptable. Shares a surname with my high school best friend.

Also his ridiculously attractive sister.

The sister might be more the issue, actually.

I would feel genuinely uncomfortable.

That said... when Adelaide or Carlton comes knocking for one of our early picks to get Sharp or to get ahead of the Dean pick, the list of possible options for the slightly downgraded pick seems to be continually growing.

54 minutes ago, Turner said:

isn't sam allan like 182cm, so nearly the complete opposite of tall winger

Quite right - my bad. I guess a better description is 'marking' winger, in so far as he can take marks on leads and can jump ridonkulously for them too.

Of course, my Sam still hasn't cracked 70cm so they all seem pretty tall to me.

4 hours ago, Six6Six said:

A bit of the action from Day one of the new preseason.

PRESEASON TRAINING GALLERY: Monday 10th November 2025

Enjoy

Really excellent set. I normally stop clicking through after a few from these but I got to the end and even recognised Jared Rivers, despite his face shifting shape a lot since... what, 2010?

Meanwhile, the Nathan Jones Academy of Getting Gradually Better Looking As You Age remains in business.

2 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

@Little Goffy 🤣🤣🤣let’s prioritize Sam’s

7-Sam Grlj

8-Sam Cumming

37- Sam Allen

I mean... A speedy line breaker who can also get into the packs happily when it is his turn to go, a powerful 'high impact' midfielder-forward with more pace than you'd expect, and a super-athletic tall winger with a bit of development to be done. We could do worse.

I guess this means Kalani White is the baked beans?

afl.com.au

Long write up on the AFL website.

Seems like the proverbial nice young man.

The article is obviously setting out to moderate perceptions of Sharp being limited in the roles he can play.

Maybe I'm a sucker, but I am reassured.

There's always a need for at least a coupke of players who can dominate in the packs, and within a few seasons he could be our only one on hand!

I still think we should prioritise Sams. At least one Sam every season.

So, uh, is Steele injured or just not someone Fox is aware of?

Other than that, the logic is simple enough and Sharp is a genuine possibility who I'd be happy for us to get.

We definitely need a succession line for the inside mids.

Literally the least broken aspect of the game.

FIXED!

What safest thou on the manners and lordly qualities of yonder Zak, scion of the Butterses?

We're in an awkward situation where we seem to have a great many young players with good character and leadership potential, but none who explicitly stand out as 'next captain'.

It might be very, very interesting to see who emerges with new boldness as player and leader without the two 'awkward' champions filling the status.

I'm cautiously optimistic that a leader will rise, but would not make any predictions with confidence.

Perennially stranded in Sydney. I think I'm more annoyed at not being able to be part of the emergence of the women's game than even about missing the men's season. This is a time which will have future medals and trophies named after it!

What, no Mason Cox?

46 minutes ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

The irony? I, too, am 191cm

I do wonder why that exact number?

29 minutes ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

Supplementary questions, @Little Goffy

• How on earth did you research that?!

• Can we expect a name enhancement: 'Neither Big Nor...'

Sorry I didn't include you in the team, Mr Reddan-A'Blew!

The 'why' is related to a moment of folklore where 191/192cm players seemed to be cursed for a number of drafts, lead by Matthew Bate, Lydnen Dunn, Colin Garland and Cale Morton - most of them began at 191 and progressed to 192cm during their career, but there was a debate at the time about whether these players would be tall enough to be key targets, or too tall to be mobile players. This was back in the era where '4-2-6' became a MFCSS trigger and Juice Newton was being given one more chance every single year.

The 'how' was pretty simple and actually came before the 'why' in a way - I was bumming around on AFL Tables and noticed you could sort players in each team by height. Sure enough, 191cm players tended to include a very short list of absolute guns and then a disproportionate number of never-quite players, giving me the confirmation bias I craved.

Oh, and @beelzebub, you're quite right some sources have Neitz as a little taller, presumably measured before going bald? But footywire, AFLTables and his retirement announcement (made post-baldness, of course) https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/85783/champion-david-neitz-retires all had him at 191cm, which is why is he was in the team but also noted as being one of the 'disputable' entries.

@Ghostwriter Taylor Walker was 190cm at draft and is now 192cm, so at some point he was in between.

Very well, it turns out it was absolutely not too easy!

Congratulations to perennial obscurity-hunter @Demonstone and to @Palace Dees for getting it.

The factor all these players have in common is that they are generally listed at 191cm!

Not bigs, not smalls, and including the very unusual height ruckmen Adam Goodes, Polly Farmer and Mike Fitzpatrick.

Truly deceptively simple, it seems!

Surely by tomorrow that'll be 'ex' sports reporter Jon Anderson.

For the record, this thread is the first time I had ever heard of Lennox Hoffman. How bizarre that in a single draft Geelong managed to bring in two kids eligible for this team?

A final clue!

As any good Demon supporter knows, glory (and answers) comes to those who give ruckmen special contemplation.

If you were playing pool by other names, this team would be neither stripes nor solids. Does that make them the 8-balls of the AFL?

(I may have to give a prize just for anyone who can parse that clue)

8 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Oooh, how enticing!

Kyle Dunkley didn't work out for MFC but I'm sticking with the family and nominating his brother Josh as my desired player.

Part two of my homework? I'll go with Jack Darling.

I'd forgotten Darling was still playing!

For those still hunting a podium finish, it has nothing to do with shenanigans in tents, but might affect comfort levels in tents.

Fun fact - Taylor Walker was not eligible at the start or end of his career, but was for a few seasons during it. It was ambiguous enough, and he is annoying enough, for him to not be included.

@Demonstone , of course, has come through with the early prizewinner.

As a reward he can nominate any current player eligible for this team to be transferred to the Demons. Bonus points if he can identify a player who is the only eligible candidate from their club!

(We have to give him extra work or he gets bored and starts disrupting the other kids in class)

@Palace Dees has placed as runner up. His prize is a time machine with the ability to redo or simply annihilate all record of the 2007 draft.