Posts posted by whatwhat say what
-
-
-
4 minutes ago, The heart beats true said: Then maybe we can lure him with the promise of a lot of 3:15 Sunday games?
the irony being that these games are more 'valuable' in the first 10 or so weeks of the season that saturday night, as they're on the fta broadcaster rather than locked away behind a paywall
-
-
-
-
-
3 minutes ago, Bowserpower said: You seem confident they will match any offer.
they're going to need picks to select their nga, f/s selections over the next two years
their ceo, matt richardson, has already said that they're confident that they can match any bid that comes in from a financial standpoint
i can't see that changing
-
35 minutes ago, Dee Boys said: How do people still not understand free agency? Port can and will match any offer for Butters. If you want him youโll be giving up at least 3 first rounders for him, nobodyโs getting him โfor freeโ.
exactly
2 2026 1sts + 1 2027 1sts is the bare minimum offering accepted and the pear will want them to be 'good' 1st round picks, given cochrane (indigenous academy, 2026), steve salopek's son and zemes pilot (f/s and academy, 2027) are going to cost them plenty
-
24 minutes ago, Ghostwriter said: Itโs the lack of communication that makes me angry. It would take a couple of minutes to update the site.
part of the challenge of the disconnect between football, football admin, and admin being in separate locations i suspect
the left hand doesn't know what the right is doing unless there is very specific and ascribed internal comms
-
-
he would know, i assume
next!
now to find out how corey ah-mu is not on our nga list in 2027
honestly, with the expected changes to the draft value indexation and the picks that you'll be required to use on a top end talent, there's not really any 'discount' any more moving forward
gw$, the bears, gc17, and bloods sucked the value out of it
baggers and the pear are going to pay up, bigly, to get the likes of walker, salopek, and cochrane
it's probably fairer / more equitable than it was, but the likes of cochrane, as an example, has been parachuted / grandfathered into the pear's indigenous academy in the last 6 months
-
Edited by whatwhat say what
fwiw, i always think the 'average' age of a list / team is a bit misleading; the median tends to tell you more about where sit in the experience ladder
we have three clear outliers in our side last weekend, with the four (edit: forgot about checkers) elder lads in the side, but they're evened out, somewhat, by the three first- and second-year players who are all around that 20 year age bracket
it's also worth looking at the games-played brackets in the footywire link:

-
-
-
-
-
1 minute ago, GawnOfTheDead said: Whatโs that mean? Lol. AFL coming up with new things all the time..
no, dingley changed it - it went from fully ticketed (e.g. you needed to upgrade to an assigned seat etc. if you were mcc / afl members etc.) to not
i'd guess it's 85k+ at the moment; sounds great and looks packed
-
5 minutes ago, adonski said: Weddle should have taken Essendon's Godfather offer
there was no offer
there was a media campaign after the trade period in 2025 that the peptides would target him on a big money deal after his contract was up
i can't see a player leaving dingley to go to the peptides at this point in time
-
-
-
-
Just now, DeeSpencer said: Not sure Anderson, Powell and Touk would count as one paced, maybe not express but theyโre great midfield runners.
We took advantage of Tracc and Humphrey out and especially of Rowell being underdone.
I feel like Rowell has been best on against us for most of the last 5 or so games. No doubt he was rusty but Steele, Sparrow and even Windsor and Kozzie pressured and tackled him superbly.
steele had a good post-game interview where they said that with rowell they tried to stick to his right hand side to limit his quick hands as he was clearly struggling post-finger injury with handling the ball cleanly
smart tactics
-
Edited by whatwhat say what
48 minutes ago, Macca said: You talk like every listed player is a future star when the reality is that there are numerous players who will never get past C grade level. Hundreds in fact
So there's plenty of room for journeymen or for players that can fill a void
We should know, we've recruited and turned over any number of players who at best, are there to fill a void or are just depth players
Not every recruit is going to have a chance of becoming a gun player
Bonner as a depth player providing a bit of value is a distinct possibility ... but not necessarily at the MFC
But if Adams is another NQR, what do we do if Petty & Lever get injured? For starters, we'd need TMac to stay upright
eh? i basically implied he's a very good vfl-level player - which he clearly is
oh, and i'd like him to be in a casey premiership or three!
if petty and / or lever get injured, it's tmac or gawn to chb! the big fella always said he thinks he could be a full back
-
COACHES VOTES: Round 02
in Melbourne Demons
according to daniel hoyne from champion data, it's the first time that the coaches have selected the identical players