Posts posted by whatwhat say what
-
-
Interesting that apparently garland - a free agent - hasn't spoken to the club or had the club speak to him about his moves in 2015.
For mine, we have too many third tall type defenders - garland, Howe, Lumumba and Grimes all essentially can play the same role of being able to play tall and small. Potentially White and you could argue Dunn also fall into that category.
Something needs to give, and with Howe and Garland both out of contract it makes sense that one is likely to go.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
zaharakis doesn't have any such threat over his head, as he's not one of the 34. from memory, neither is zach merrett, but there's no way the bombers will give him up.
zaka would be a fine addition to our side, but bombers, as is their wont, would demand hogan, brayshaw and some magic beans for him, and then go off in a huff when we declared that price was a bit steep.
our second rounder (18-25ish) would be what you'd want to pay.
-
we need players who can see ball, get ball, use ball.
if if he can get over his knee injury without any major concerns - and it's a big IF at this stage, as apparently it was a pretty nasty one - then we'd be mad not to chase prestia.
in terms of targetting players from the northern clubs, prestia and treloar would be top tier, dixon, bennell and josh kelly next, and then the likes of plowman (richmond want him), tomlinson, leuenberger (again, tigers into him in a big way apparently), lonergan, et al.
-
no, it really isn't.
when hogan comes out of contract, the new cba will have been arranged - the aflpa is trying to get it tied to revenue in the game, around the 25% mark.
hogan could easily pull in $1m a season in his third contract, and wouldn't even be that extravagant.
i wonder what the tipping point is going to be for the afl to really become a different sort of business.
-
-
Oh yes, slip of the thumb...
Apparently it's Dixon and Bennell: http://m.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/gold-coast-plan-to-lose-harley-bennell-and-charlie-dixon-20150706-gi6g1z.html
Our first rounder, second rounder and Howe.
-
-
-
whether or not he's in play might be irrelevant, as we're at 100% of the cap, don't have anyone notable on big money going (possible exception being jamar), and have a couple of reasonably significant players - garland, howe - out of contract.
also, i can't see treloar leaving gws, and if he does, i can't seem him heading for the dees.
-
-
-
-
His kicking is one of the things that worries me, he's sometimes way too casual and misses targets.
Interesting you mention Watts, but I think Yarran is very outside and very much picks and chooses. As I say if we are making a play for pace I would rather us throw some cash at Motlop.
motlop has been mooted as one of the possible moves if crows do choose to 'match' the dangerfield contract (presuming it comes from the cats) and force geelong to the trade table.
-
Edited by DemonAndrew
bennell and charlie dixon both on the market i'm lead to believe.
personally i don't think they're worth that much - the former is unpredictable on and off the field, and the latter is predictable in that he can't stay ON the field for more than about two games in a row before he breaks down with injury.
both are, however, super talents.
our first rounder (4-7), third rounder (38-43) plus howe for both of them and gc17's second rounder (18-20).
even that would make me nervous that gc17 would actually be the 'winner'.
-
-
yes, but then what do we do with the ones that we've got?
can't see us getting rid of lumumba, and if cross goes on and we sign up garland and grimes, it means including salem we have five, and then unless suckling can play as part of the midfield - and, hey, who's to say he can't? - we are looking too loaded up in that area i reckon.
would suckling make us a better side? absolutely, i'd expect. so i wouln't be upset if we got him!
apparently we're at 100% of the cap at the moment? presumably jamar is taking a big chunk of that and i can't see him going on.
-
-
Delistings/trades at end of the season
in Melbourne Demons
Stick a fork in about half a dozen of em.