BoBo

Crows top of the ladder currently

Ahhh geez, hope Dawson isn’t injured

They’re awesome to watch

42-0 that quarter

The tackling is bloody great

Thank you for acknowledging the calibre of my thinking.

Mmmm dunno, the other poster said he lived next door to multiple sports women that were jerks to your 1 non-[censored]. Was this Olympian a man or a woman also? Because if it’s a man, it’s only strengthening the case that all sports women are up themselves. I’ll err on the side of the majority sample pool for now and just assume all sports women are jerks. It’s the only logical inference I can make out of this data set.

Nah I don’t mind him, loveable scamp in my eyes

He’s one of those intellectuals. I see the problem.

Hey can you ask? That’s interesting to me. Would have thought he was beloved

I am so, so sorry

It’s an interesting decision to want Silvagni in the first place from McCrae, obviously sees something in him. He’s a good utility player for sure, but if I have the choice between the two, I’m choosing Mihocek all day long.

I’d put Elliot, Pendles, Sidebottom, Jaicos and Hill in that camp. The rest can GOGF.

I would love to see a Dogs V Crows grand final. That would genuinely be awesome. Just all out attack

He kicks important goals which is exactly what we need.

Good way to G up the crowd.

Big yes from me for 2 years. Genuine target and even his bad games are rarely that bad. He’s consistent and you know what you’re gonna get. Would know a thing or two about standards and would be a good mentor for JVR and Jeffo. Edit: and would know what a functioning forward line should be doing/receiving.

Let’s go India! Hoping for another moral victory for England.

Best of luck young fella, take your opportunity!

I said it in an above comment, but if we need to do basically a review to see if the changes that were recommended were: A) implemented Or B) implemented correctly Then I fail to see how that isn’t a systemic failure of oversight. I have only ever done mid-management roles but monitoring that implementations have been made and maintained is core at even that level.

Yeah I think I’m at a point after reading this to say that Green/the board needs to answer some questions about this statement. Were they monitoring his performance and this article is incorrect? If not…. WHY???????? If that article is correct then what are they doing down there? You don’t wait for implemented changes to fall over (not be followed in the first place) before you assess them. It’s literally called monitoring. Alarm bells are going off on so many levels.

Really well said LH. It really seems like there’s systemic issues with accountability.

I’m confused as to where this team is list/age/expectations wise for next year. Are we expecting to be in contention next year? Are we planning to continue to rebuild? I’d expect losses if we fundamentally changed positioning (not Tracc/Oliver/Viney ever as the midfield trio for example) and we are building for 27’/28’/29’, but is that what we’re doing? I.e. blooding all the youth and bringing in more. Are we expecting to have a serious shot at a Granny next year? Because if Goodwin is left in charge, what choice does he have but to just try and win as many games as possible despite what moves might be better long term? That’s where I’m at, he’s literally coaching for his job, not necessarily what is beneficial for us beyond next year as that may not be enough to save his job. Approaching Daniher to come out of retirement is one such move.

Wow. This game is stuffed.

Yep that’s totally fair.