Jump to content

Red But Mostly Blue

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Red But Mostly Blue

  1. 10 minutes ago, BillyBoy said:

    I have been following MFC since the early 1960s and have been a long-time paid up Member (in high tier of the membership commitment).

    I live in NSW but up until this year I have attended 16 games a year in Melbourne (as per home-and-away Membership).

    I don't think I will renew my membership again this time around.

    Why?

    1. I did not withdraw my membership this year even though I knew there would be no possibility of attending games. I did write to the MFC asking them to reciprocate by negotiating cheap Kayo subscriptions for members, particularly those in NSW, who rarely are able to even watch the games on TV (7 Mate only carries a few games up here). MFC declined that suggestion. So I concluded the loyalty in these difficult times was one-way - me to them.

    2. Irrespective of the fact they mistakenly renewed the senior coaches contract for some years it is clear he is consistently out coached by smarter operators. He needs to be replaced. He appears inflexible and is often outwitted by other strategies (the Footscray game was a classic example of that).

    3. His game plan, inasmuch as there is one, relies on skill levels that our players do not seem to have. I cannot tell whether that is a basic talent issue (player problem) or a lack of player development issue (coaching problem).

    4. They consistently select players that are incapable of the standard. Hiding Oscar in the forward line yesterday was embarrassing.

    5. I did manage to see a game in Sydney this year. Melksham was playing poorly and at one stage he came off the field to the interchange and a supporter (there weren't many) shouted something about getting a move on (nothing offensive) and Melksham replied something like "come down here you [censored]" (threatening the spectator) which summarised his disdain for those who support the club through thick and thin. He rarely sets the world on fire with his play, often doesn't contest and is clearly a product of poor decision-making from the coach via his Essendon connection.

    6. The fact they select players who cannot compete with the better teams and/or (most importantly) lesser teams that display more earnest indicates a recruitment problem. Despite all the fanfare about Lever, for example, the rate of return to the club from his contract is very low, and I am not including his injury period (which was not his fault) in that assessment. He talks a lot about leadership but is not worth the fee. Steven May is clearly playing well and apart from his initial misadventure (overweight/undertrained etc) has contributed strongly to the club. But he is also expensive. That outlay might have been justified if we were that close to contesting the GF. But we are light-years from that now and we should have used that cash to develop some younger talents. Some of the other recruitment decisions and trading away draft picks are mind-boggling.

    7. I don't mind the team losing - we have been loyal for decades with that the norm - but when I saw players not even running last night as Sydney players broke tackles with ease - then one have to question why I pay several hundred dollars a year to fund that sort of player commitment. There is a disconnect somewhere and it doesn't seem to be getting any better. The post-match analysis from the journalists often highlight the lack of two-way run from many of our players, who often seem to be coasting. I have seen that a lot.

    These are reasons among others why I find it difficult to continue. I thought things were on the improve with Jackson/Roos. But whatever development work they put in seems to have been squandered by a series of poor followup decisions, including the senior coach appointment.

    It is very hard psychologically to remain anything other than detached from what is going on with the MFC. And, footy after all is just a game that we seek a bit of fun away from our other, more serious endeavours in life.

    Two things the club should do to change this:

    1. Get an established senior coach who has demonstrated their skills. If the club asked me to put in an extra hundred bucks or something to help them pay out existing contracts I would do that in a flash.

    2. Stop talking about brands and all that hype and admit that the team is nowhere near being a successful finals club with its current list and use that cultural shift to renew the list. St Kilda and Carlton are now ahead of us in prospect and Sydney and Fremantle will next overtake us.

     

     

     

    Great post, perfect summary really.

    Agree - we have an opportunity to correct things but we have to make some immediate, tough decisions or else we'll continue to be overtaken by other clubs. 

    We're wasting the good talent we DO have (and we do have it), and sorely need to recognise that something very ordinary happened to our culture long ago and it has not been restored. The marketing videos don't restore a thing, they just keep putting our deficiencies in the spotlight to be mocked when we don't deliver, which is about as close a thing as we have to a brand right now - i.e. disappointment, false dawns, over-inflated egos. I don't mind ego, I guess, but you need to win things for that sort of crap.

    We're a great club, but the glory days fade day by day and we're at risk of squandering talent and having to do yet another rebuild, which will be harder and harder to do as the years go by - who would want to join this basket case when you could go to the other clubs on the rise?

    For things to change, we have to change.

  2. I just managed to catch Goody's presser.

    I don't know why his comments aggravate me so much. Maybe because it exposes his lack of knowledge - the fact that he doesn't even know he's been out-coached?

    He talked about how we lost it in the first half was also off. I mean, yeah, we created chances but we were playing 16 on the ladder! I'd like to think we created some chances, but I think our skills were still really poor. Many of our boys were unsighted and his coaching 'masterstroke' was OMac up forward? I dunno, I thought he was as usual pretty oblivious to the fact that we were pretty poor throughout. Not just for a half.

    Ugh.

  3. 11 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

    6 definite ins ... & Hibberd if fit (but unlikely) 

    Baker Bedford Bennell Hunt Lockhart Pickett 

    I want pace. That’s what we needed v Swans and not Wagner Oscar and Smith  (Goodwin you [censored]) 

    outs.
    Jones (sorry that’s time ??)
    Oscar mcd ??? (delist) Joel Smith ? ?(trade or delist) Spargo ? Melksham  Wagner ??

     

    Lockhart  May. Lever

    Salem Tomlinson Rivers 

    Langdon. Viney. Baker 

    Bennell. Brown. ANB

    Pickett. Weideman. Bedford 

    Gawn Trac. Oliver 

    Brayshaw.  Anb Harmes Fritsch 

    Pretty much agree with this, except for ANB. I just don't get what he gives us. He was an instant in this week and other than the goal was largely unsighted (unless you count him running around in circles).

    Melksham is tricky. I think he needs a spell as he's looked out of sorts for a long time. But I honestly think we're a better team when he's on some. He's one of the few who actually pass to a lead i50 rather than just bomb it in. He's a smart footballer, but prone to being lazy - needs a reality check, but I prefer him in the team in the long term.

    Fritter, I'm not sure what happened to him. He's way off. He used to be a pretty good kick, what the hell? 

    Overall I'm against the deck chair approach, recycling through the same guys, we need to stick with a relatively stable team if we want these guys to gel. Baker and Bedford are not the answers, not long term anyway. I mean they have been ok in brief stints. If we think they are the answer, we need to commit to them, rather than play them, then go nah, and replace with the same guy we dropped the week before.

  4. Just now, america de cali said:

    We had to bring in another failed coach to replace another failed coach.

    I never got the love for Richardson. Many talked of his 'smarts', but I haven't seen anything, other than the same stunned mullet face as Goody.

  5. 1 minute ago, Wiseblood said:

    John Longmire is a very smart coach.

    He is the sort of coach that has Goodwin's number more often than not.

    Not that Goody is responsible for all of them, but 9 out of the last 10 games going the Swans way is damning.

  6. 2 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

    Also, one thing that needs to be highlighted:

    We had yet another quarter, the second, where the opposition banged in five goals while we didn't kick one of our own.  It happens way too often for a side supposedly pushing for finals.

    Take that one out and we won the first and third quarters, and both kicked 3.3 in the last.  

    I'm merely bringing this up to show that we are still having this sort of brain fades that don't last five minutes, but last for thirty, and we don't seem to have any answer for it when it starts to go pear shaped.

    It's true.

    It's like a car crash, and Goody is the guy who drives by realllllyyyy slow. Stunned face and all.

    But to be fair, the players need to stand up as well, and they just seem content to watch it all happening, like they're in the couch with us.

    There doesn't seem to be any leadership during these moments either.

  7. I'd say we were woeful, pathetic, embarrassing, soul-crushing, heartless, lazy, gut-wrenchingly poor, shameful...

    ...but that would be ignoring the fact that the Swans have been a powerhouse this year, and clearly headed for a premiership! 

    ☹️

  8. 1 minute ago, Diamond_Jim said:

    wind has dropped substantially from the first quarter

    clutching at straws

    How so? 

    But even then, even if no breeze, we kicked a solitary goal in a whole quarter, which is poor.

    And I guess if the breeze has dropped, there should be no impediment to us kicking 4 in the final quarter, right?

  9. Just now, leave it to deever said:

    34 to 26 inside 50 to our advantage. Can we please get a solid full forward the can kick 3  a game. Ill chip in 100 bucks.

    I keep chipping in heaps of bucks but it seems this club keeps using my money to buy potato seeds. I'd love a solid, reliable FF. 

  10. That's about as bad a first half as I've seen. Eerily similar to the Port game.

    We're being shown up by the titans of footy in 2020 - the bloody Swans! What the hell!? 

    The teams below us must love it. They know they can have a crack at a spot in the 8 while we're in there!

    And we wonder why we're not taken seriously as a club? We've got no heart. And the rare times that it does beat, it is short-lived and replaced by dead silence. We're a club that needs to be resuscitated by accumulated disgust from its members and Board. 

    Let's see if we grow some balls and a little heart in the second half (we're going to need it given the predicament we've put ourselves in!), but I won't hold my breath.

    I've seen this movie before and know how it ends.

    Pathetic.

  11. 49 minutes ago, Farmer said:

    Just get over your preconceptions mate. He played well

    Yeah fair he wasn't terrible. On the upside he's the better of the Wagners haha. Look, I'm not a fan and today was far from the worst I've seen him, and if him playing alright down there means we get Harmes back to where he needs to be, I'm ok with that.

  12. The 4 points should go to May. A deadset one man fortress.

    (But to be fair, Salem, Trac, Rivers, Langdon, Lever and Weed were also great ).

    A lot of passengers, though. Which is disappointing, but also kind of promising - imagine who we can beat if they get involved!