Posts posted by Deemented Are Go!
-
-
-
4 minutes ago, CBDees said:
Melbourne should pay pick 10 (2017) and our second round (2018) for Lever and no more!
Why should we be trying creative packaging to obtain another first round pick, when Lever was:
1) Not in their top 10 B&F; and
2) Scored 1 vote in the Brownlow (same as O. Mac)?
Because Adelaide are petulant tossers and we want to maintain our 'amicably workable' trading rep for the future.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3 hours ago, Abe said:
Weideman has shown enough to suggest that with time and development he can become a good player.
Hes alresdy dominated games at VFL level and as his body develops I'm sure that'll transition to AFL
the big guys do seem to take 3-4 years to get going
Wow, check into the Jake Lever thread to find it mutated into a discussion on Weed's development and a reminiscing session about Robbie Flower?!?!
JUST DO THE FRIGGIN DEAL ALREADY!

-
-
-
-
-
-
18 minutes ago, wheaters31 said:
So we offered a deal.
Then the Crows countered with a similar deal.
Manager told Melb, Pies and Dogs that Lever was staying.
Then we offered a bigger deal that knocked Crows for six (aka BANG).
Lever gone to Demons.
I think that's what he meant. I have young cousins so I understand gibberish.
Thanks for the (potential) translation.
In any case, I thought Adelaide have a strict salary policy - it would go against that principal to make a large counter-offer, wouldn't it?

Welcome to Demonland: Jake Lever
in Melbourne Demons
I'm pretty sure Lever didn't play that game.