Unqualified opinion

Lazy and not good enough from a former captain.

May tried. Unfortunately the fence is an extra metre back. ?

Soft as. Played for it. Umpire looked like he want to pay anything

Good build up. Poor left foot entry by melksham. Turnover

How’s that not a free to Hannan when Geary didn’t even know it was his

Good kick from Brown. Needs to make TMac earn a call up. More please

Push in the back!!!!

Never called on 3 v 1. Umpire interpretation of words that should be black and white

Maxy!!!!

With a slow loopy opposite (left) footed kick that wasn’t to advantage but on Top of Oliver’s head in which he wasn’t to know who was around him. Jones’ fault

That’s fifty umpire. You can’t hold up play. How do I know the rules but you [censored] don’t

Hmmm. Jones fault. wasn’t a good effort from Oliver but wasn’t his fault to start with

FMD umpire if you can’t bounce in the circle....call it back

Weak by Oliver. Poor choice from Jones. Bad MFC football

How is Omac not quicker and first to the drop zone?

Better late than never.....but if this is all that is mentioned then it’s a disgrace that the media think the public only care about a select few clubs.

Too much common sense....... the only problem.....‘stars’ will get rubbed out

Whateley has a vested interest in creating a difference for his [censored] cats. I can’t believe no one in the media (Lewis aside) can see the hypocrisy.

No mention on outcome.......... https://resources.afl.com.au/afl/document/2019/12/04/68a18e95-713c-4408-a269-06b2aef6db34/2019-Tribunal-Guidelines.pdf FMD.

Written submission- result tomorrow https://www.afl.com.au/news/490575/afl-tribunal-tigers-to-appeal-staging-sanctions

Inconsistencies: front on contact - Sparrow free against Vs Weid no free for play on - avb no call as who’s ball but still allowed to be tackled with no advantage. Pretty sure the dogs were allowed to stop play and reset. 50m penalty - dog player didn’t move after being asked by ump (from a May kickout) play on high contact - one passage had three/four but none were called. Fritta had his head taken off, no call. htb - brayshaws knock out of the pack the only one paid a free kick but so many dropping the ball when dogs were tackled.

An umpire will remember this rule when a Melbourne player takes the ball in the back pocket and will be asked to align with the centre of the goal square, squashed up against the fence causing a kick into the player on the mark.

We would be if the actions happened after the player disposed of the ball and it actually was a downfield infringement.

Thanks sons i mentioned the melk one in game day thread, is there guidance on when players need to go ‘East West’ and when they can protect the angled pass to corridor. Happens every week - shouldn’t have been a 50 without warning. With warning, Melksham is dumb and justified. The real issue I had yesterday was with the missed frees to us. There was one passage when 4-5 frees for holding, high or htb weren’t paid but then a dubious call to the dogs was called. I don’t understand why we are held to a different standard. Every week is made harder (and frustrating for fans) with no explanation.

Our outside mids and flankers looked slow, poorly skilled, dumb etc today. Why??? Because our inside mids didn’t win the ball. We were chasing from the first bounce. Their ball use was cleaner and enabled their outside players to do as they please. our outside players looked good the last few weeks, why? We won the ball in the middle.