Posts posted by joeboy
-
-
-
Gawn - heart of lion
Petty - tried but overwhelmed
K Pickett - couldn’t get involved
Tholstrup - maintained attention span
Windsor - out of depth
Steele - continued working hard
Jiath - loose and inefficient
Fritsch - generally worked hard
vanRooyen - back to reality
Mihocek - an old magpie
Turner - will be missed
Chandler - needed more involvement
Sparrow - another irrelevant game
L Pickett - Bambi in headlights
Salem - prolific but wasteful
Howes - uncertain of role
Sharp - some irrelevant cameos
Rivers - poor under pressure
Langford - another poor game
Lindsay - not a defender
Culley - Casey standard today
Lever - stood up well
Langdon - kept on running
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Gawn - dominated the millionaire
vanRooyen - a reinvented footballer
K Pickett - great under adversity
Steele - experience was invaluable
Mihocek - an important addition
Jiath - was impressively reliable
Chandler - a hard worker
Salem - a memorable milestone
Windsor - great first half
Fritsch- an important ingredient
Turner - stood up consistently
Rivers - enjoyed new position
Lindsay - calm and composed
Sharp - important second half
Culley - cause for excitement
Tholstrup - was not disgraced
Lever - plenty of concerns
Langdon - was surprisingly quiet
Howes - tight and reliable
Petty - impressive and versatile
Langford - very quiet game
Sparrow - was rarely sighted
L Pickett - worth the ticket
-
-
1 minute ago, joeboy said: 20 hours ago, joeboy said: Beg to B: H.Petty 35 J.Lever 8 B.Howes 22
HB: C.Jiath 14 D.Turner 10 C.Salem 3
C: J.Culley 13 J.Steele 9 E.Langdon 15
HF: K.Pickett 36 J.van Rooyen 2 L.Pickett 33
F: B.Fritsch 31 B.Mihocek 28 K.Chandler 37
Foll: M.Gawn - C 11 C.Windsor 6 H.Langford 4
I/C: X.Lindsay 5 K.Tholstrup 12 T.Rivers 24 H.Sharp 30 T.Sparrow 321 hour ago, Kev said: Great for Sharp to get an early look in.
I think he is our best crumber of the ball, from off the pack (reads it well), and will work hard to get front and centre.
Kozzie says hi
-
7 minutes ago, joeboy said: Beg to differ.
I think he’s one of the best performers of the preseason
Easily our strongest team ( on paper ) since 2021
2 minutes ago, jnrmac said: B: H.Petty 35 J.Lever 8 B.Howes 22
HB: C.Jiath 14 D.Turner 10 C.Salem 3
C: J.Culley 13 J.Steele 9 E.Langdon 15
HF: K.Pickett 36 J.van Rooyen 2 L.Pickett 33
F: B.Fritsch 31 B.Mihocek 28 K.Chandler 37
Foll: M.Gawn - C 11 C.Windsor 6 H.Langford 4
I/C: X.Lindsay 5 K.Tholstrup 12 T.Rivers 24 H.Sharp 30 T.Sparrow 32Emerg: J.Melksham 18 T.McDonald 25 M.Heath 27
-
-
-
-
9 hours ago, FTB said: I think this is the team we go with now that Culley is good to go.
B: McDonald, Turner, Petty
HB: Salem, Lever, Lindsay
C: Langford, Steele, Langdon
HF: Sparrow, Van Rooyen, Fritsch
F: K Pickett, Mihocek, Chandler
R: Gawn, Windsor, Rivers
I: Jiath, L Pickett, Tholstrup, Culley, Howes
Not bad but if they actually line up like this I’d say it’s probably the slowest back line EVER selected
-
20 minutes ago, chookrat said: This - I'm tired of the hyperbole that our State Government is bankrupt. Being bankrupt means we can't pay our bills, which is clearly not the case.
My personal take is that the club is quiet re Caulfield at the direction of the State Government pending an announcement re funding. While there may be some finer details to sort out, I would expect the silence is more to do with timing an announcement with the election rather than any genuine blocker. You don't annoy members with silence for the sake of it unless you expect positive news, especially when you have a clean slate with a new Coach, CEO and President.
Not sure that ‘timing an announcement with the election’ is going to win votes from non Dees’ supporters
-
POSTGAME: Rd 02 vs Fremantle
in Melbourne Demons
I agree, and further to the older cousin’s output is that his disposals are often haphazard whereas they used to regularly be almost centimeter perfect