dieter

I don't understand the question. My question is - as per Nutbean's post - just who is advocating strict adherence to so-called sharia law? Lunatics like Hanson and Lambie rave on about it, but just who in Australia advocates it?

Good point. So, who is advocating return to strict sharia law?

That's a great critique of why you hate anything to do with the Muslim faith. Just for the record, there are as many examples of not very nice things, shall we say, in the old testament, and, if you really want to have your sensibilities singed and are strong of stomach read the Torah and the Talmud. If you would like a definition of Sharia law, you may be interested in watching this: https://www.facebook.com/alikadribrisbane/videos/1341037999294413/

As they say in the classics, my dear boy, do you have the faintest idea what the term 'sharia law means'? Hopefully you're not just going to regurgitate the ignorant garbage that spews forth from Hanson and Lambie. So, please, enlighten us, What exactly is Sharia Law?

Let's face it, it's good to have an opinion in the kitchen based on, shall we say, traditional virtues? Where can traditional virtue be found these days? These days so-called feminists don't even know how to boil a spud, let alone plug in a toaster. As the preacher said in Ecclesiastes, all is vanity and a striving after wind. There is nothing new under the sun. In other words, feminists have been around since time inmanmorial.

Sorry, misunderstood, didn't know Marlon had girlfriends...

I agree entirely. That's because most feminists are Turkish Muslims. I happen to know that for a fact.

Just saying, as they say. It's a grand hypothesis, don't you think? Blame it all on the friggin olive trees planted in Australia recently, and the alpacas and the grape vines. It's certainly not car emissions, couldn't be, we've had cars since 1910. I think we're onto something Twitter, we've solved the climate change debate. It's the olive oil magnates that have screwed us!!! Having said that, you'll probably not agree because most Olive Oil Magnates aren't Muslims.

Like the Sheiks of Saudi Arabia, or the Bush clan, ah. olive oil magnates. Like Popeye's girlfriend. We live in a strange, confused world, Mr Twitter. Do you think it's the olive trees that have caused climate change then?

Kurz/Marlon, Last mango In Paris, Butter...your memory is failing you

How did Kurz cope with that? It's not a natural substance, you know, even blow flies won't go near it...

I thought you were up the river with Kurz and your tub of butter.

If anything, I despise Hilarious/NOT more than Trump because she was even more dishonest.

Ah, yes he's still'performing'. He's tweeting, shaking hands like a sumo wrestler, still telling one preposterous lie after the other, appointing even more war-mongers and fringe lunatics that Obama ever did, and, almost unbelievably, taking his audience further to the brink of catastrophe than any human being before him save perhaps Churchill and Hitler. Enjoy the performance, Big Macca. The rest of us are doing poo in our pantaloons.

I agree with you almost 100%, however, the Julia stuff WAS on the nose. The gal was no saint. She certainly had form about the poor Palestinians.

Ah, yes, I see that you mean. That's the trouble with writing while sober, you'll agree, not a desirable state...

So there will be no Roz wards or Julia Gillards in the USA under the Strumpet? No self-featherers, you might say. I find it unbelivable that anyone can believe this. In the meantime, Strumpet tweets abuse at department stores that won't stock his daughter's label, he appoints members of the Strumpet clan to sinecures and positions of importance, appoints shady nuts like Tillerson, Bannon etc etc etc etc.

Don't understand: I quoted his take on the BBC and put in my 2 bob's worth about the BBC....what's wrong with that? I do accept, however, your second observation.

Well put, Twitter and Bisted.

The BBC is not the squeaky clean outfit it seems to be. I first became sus when the BBC produced that dreadful Mavi Marvara Documentary with Jane Corbin. In one sequence she walks down a 'heavily muslim populated part of Istanbul' to prove that the attempt by this Turkish ship to run the Israeli blockade of Gaza was nothing but an attempt to embarrass poor little Israel. Jane then interviews the usual suspects of Israeli high command and spin doctors and the problem in Jane's eyes was the 'weapons of mass destruction' some of the people who the Israelis murdered used to defend themselves with, for example, iron railings. She may as well have done a documentary about Katyn and just quoted the KGB and Soviet historians and Generals. The BBC is now a propaganda outlet for British governments.

I agree entirely.

Sound resume indeed for a mass murdering swine and major bullduster.

Interesting article in this morning's Counterpunch: FEBRUARY 9, 2017 Trump’s Truth Bomb: “You Think We’re So Innocent?” by JOHN WIGHT Email “Putin’s a killer.” This was the claim made by Fox News ‘journalist’ Bill O’Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump’s reply came in the form of a simple question. “What, you think our country’s so innocent?” It was a reply that succeeded in puncturing the bubble of exceptionalism in which Mr O’Reilly and those like him have long chosen to cocoon themselves from reality. It was an extraordinary exchange, one that has gone viral on social media since. For liberals in the US and beyond it is being touted as yet more evidence of the fact that Donald Trump is completely unsuited to the rigors of the office of President. Meanwhile for dyed-in-the-wool neocons it suggests a leader of the so-called free world who is yet to realize the difference between ‘us’, the good guys, and ‘them’, the bad guys. “Putin’s a killer.” Just ponder this statement for a moment, consider the ignorance, arrogance, and delusion it describes. Consider, too, the millions of human slaughtered by successive US presidents over the years, going back, say, to the Korean War and working your way forward. That they were killed in the name of democracy and human rights, at least according to Bill O’Reilly and the rest of the gang over at Fox News, is a boast as preposterous as it is grotesque. Firstly, justifying the wholesale slaughter of men, women, and children in the name of democracy renders the word completely meaningless. And secondly, what Mr O’Reilly describes as democracy others would describe as imperialism. But then, you see, this is the problem when you sit at the apex of the most destructive empire the world has ever known. It distorts your sense reality to the point where you become intoxicated with the associated myths used to justify this empire and the vast destruction it has wreaked and continues to wreak across the world. We see this distortion in the way that Barack Obama has been allowed to walk off into the sunset with the highest approval ratings of any US president in living memory, lamented as one of the most progressive leaders ever to occupy the Oval Office. It is a rendering of the legacy country’s first black president that fails to pass even the most tepid scrutiny. Obama’s administration was, to be frank, a veritable killing machine, one comprising almost daily drone strikes, kill lists, and the wholesale destruction of entire countries, as in the case of Libya. In his final year in office the US dropped 27,000 bombs, up from the number dropped in 2015. Yet we are meant to regard the 44th president and recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize as the modern incarnation of Dr Martin Luther King, a president who worked tirelessly for peace and justice. etc etc etc

A bit like you rants.

I wish you were Harpo, totally silent.