Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Saturday nights worst umpiring decision , did pay dividends. When Gus had his kick forward paid as deliberate out of bounds, most of us die hardsĀ cried foul and couldn’t believe the stupidity of the umpire, but then….. Guthrie kicks out on the full ( thanks to Tracs harassing on the mark), a brain fade in hitting the ball 20 metres into the stands ( despite Scott claiming it in the field of play), 50 metres!Ā and Jakes smart kick to Max.Ā 
a goal and we do not have to play Port in AdelaideĀ 

So thank you Mr Umpire for the dumbest decision of the year and allowing the Dees to finish on top.

in all seriousness the decision against Gus couldĀ have shaped,Ā who eventually won the Premiership!

we all know how good the Umpiring has been this year!!!!!!!!

Edited by premiers13

  • 1 month later...
Ā 

It's funny how history has these moments. The last minute of that game had three questionable decisions. Look back with ~50 seconds to play. How was Selwood's kick deemed to be NOT deliberate?Ā Probably because Brad Close was nearby? The deliberate OOB by Gus was more questionable, as to me (a one eyed Demon supporter that tries to be objective) it appeared that Gus was trying to gain territory and not have the ball go OOB. Gus never even took possession but kicked the ball off the turf, unlike Selwood who had possession.

The DOOB was paid by the umpire in the Demon forward line. The Umpire where the kick came from was the mid field umpire and didn't appear to be going to pay DOOB, it should have been his decision i.e. where the kick came from as he had a better perspective of Gus's intentions. When the ball went OOF from Guthrie's kick and Brad Close punched the ball into the empty stadium from outside the field of play, it seemed to me that the mid field umpire was trying to right the wrong of the previous decision and give Melbourne back the territory the other umpire had taken from us. Close could have easily argued he was only trying to touch the ball before it crossed the line.

Good on Jake Lever for immediately pointing out Close's indiscretion (that said the umpire already had the whistle in his mouth). If Lever had taken the Geelong approach he would have run into Close's back while making his way to take his kick to try to gain a subsequent 50m penalty for obstruction, as Close was running in a straight line between Lever and the new mark. This is a tactic Geelong have perfected under Brad Scott (remember a couple of seasons ago Dangerfield running into Gus's back at a ruck contest to gain a free kick and kick a goal - Selwood smugly walking past Gus clapping after the goal). I'm so glad JL didn't as I think it was far more fitting for Max to do that and put to rest some of his own demons for misses in the past.

The DOOB rule itself is fraught with subjectivity - did the player mean for the ball to go out etc. I don't think that this was the worst interpretation of this rule for the season. For me it was undoubtedly the DOOB that was not paid against Adelaide in the dying seconds of the Round 10 game. Had that been paid - whatever score Melbourne got from that, would have rendered the outcome of Round 23 irrelevant as the Dees would have ended 1st or 2nd regardless.Ā It's funny how history has these moments.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Ā Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 281 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies