Posts posted by Vipercrunch
-
-
12 hours ago, Slartibartfast said:
I know this will be howled down but TMac is too good to not have in the 22. If May comes back I’d be moving Petty forward. AJ was poor in the ruck against Brown and JvR is much better. Jeffo has no intensity and I’d prefer Turner and Petty to AJ and Jeffo.Â
If Spargs is ready he’s a class above Hendo.Â
Wont happen, but that’s my take.ÂI'm on the Petty is a forward bandwagon with you and I'm staying there. He is the best contested mark out of all the players we've tried up forward in the past few seasons, and that makes him a big point of difference. TMac had a great season last year, and I think the backline of May, Lever and TMac should be continued this season.
JVR, Petty and one of Jeffo or Turner, along with Fritsch (staying much closer to goal than he did yesterday) and the smalls rotating through is our best look I think. -
Always disappointing to lose like that but I kind of felt it was a bit of a free kick of a game prior to the first bounce. They had the advantage of playing last week and are one of the most highly fancied teams while we were playing with 5 AFL debutants. As long as we weren’t smashed it seems an acceptable result.Â
ÂSlight worry for me was our scoring profile. Goals from centre clearance are wonderful to watch but they aren’t reliable. Need to keep working hard on scoring from turnovers and from the back half.Â
ÂStill much to like but  we got so so close and gave up the lead in the last minute.Â
-
-
-
-
Edited by Vipercrunch
I wonder if Jackson is on St Kildas radar. They seem desperate to land a big fish and from the dollars they have reportedly thrown around, we won't be abe to compete against them.
Â
You'd think any fair trade for Jackson back to Victoria definetaly opens up the door for us to get a good trade for Kozzy, however, will Freos trade targets need to change if they lose Jackson?Â
-
15 minutes ago, binman said:
Interesting point.
As you say koz had had two sold hit outs already. And obviously he's not playing in the first 3 rounds.
That could mean them running with the team they might go with round one.
That said missing the first three rounds might mean they want to take the opportunity to get one more match load and fitness into koz.
The round 4 game is on April 4th, which is almost 5 weeks after this Sunday's game. There will be virtually zero residual fitness benefit for playing Pickett on Sunday. All his match fitness and loads will have to be managed in training sessions in the couple of weeks prior to that game.Â
Still very hard to stomach that he got suspended for that incident.... stupid AFL 🤬🤬🤬Â
-
Curious with what we do with Pickett. If this a full dress rehersal for Rd 1, do we leave him out?
For me, it really depends on how big the benches are (ie how many players the coaches can give a run to see how they fit), but given Pickett has already played 2 preseason games, I actually think he will be left out (which will surprise some).
-
-
20 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:
I wish ALL clubs played intraclub practise matches in the preseasonÂ
Round 1 should be the first meeting of oppositionÂ
I think the Season would have a far better build up..
I actually think the practice matches provide the build up and without them, crowd numbers and engagement would be lower in the first few rounds. For every one footy tragic who has eagerly been devouring training reports all off-season, there are 5 or 10 far less engaged supporters who need the mainstream reporting of the prctice games to create their expecations and get the anticipation up for Round 1.
And like most, I agree that Round Zero is a train wreck that needs to be scrapped straight away.
-
-
The amount of opinion stated as fact in this thread is ridiculous, even for Demonland standards. This story has been swirling around since he joined the club and he hasn't gone anywhere. And as yet, there has never been a credible source given for the remours.
Given he spent the Christmas break in NZ, not in WA or SA, he doesn't seem desperately homesick to me.Â
-
-
-
-
5 hours ago, M_9 said:
When you say ‘any posters’ are you suggesting there was more than just me?
In my defence I did state (with stats) that the key to Harry’s game is his marking. Good to see on Saturday it was more than that. Tackling, competing and at least one deft touch.
There were several posters who wanted him dropped in the lead up to the Geelong game. Some like yourself have owned it, others haven't.
-
-
-
Â
I'm backing Petty to turn it around as a forward. He pretty much missed the entire preseason, so he has some catching up to do. Definetely worth persevering.
-
-
5 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:
Â
Surely there's a better alternative than playing this match on the same day as the senior match?
What's wrong with Sat or Sunday?
Reserves as the curtain raiser to the seniors worked for a very long time, and is fondly remembered. It still works for nearly every non-AFL competetion in the nation.
-
-
-
PREGAME: Rd 04 vs Geelong
in Melbourne Demons
The only thing I want to see this game is a massive reduction in the fumbling and horrible skills that have made watching our team so painful the last two weeks. Get between the ears fixed, get the confidence back, excecute our skills at an AFL level and lets see what we can actually do rather than another train wreck.