Miracle

mo64 Think of the premiership coaches of the last 10 years Do you really think that they would tolerate this

You completely miss the point. I am talking about attitude. Skill errors are not attitude errors. You are starting to talk nonsense

No I would not drop a player for one soft effort But I would drop Dunn for multiple soft efforts

For Hannabal to suggest that he HAS to be dropped is laughable.

Rhino, Do you know the term of his current contract?

I heard that he may go back to Adelaide Does anyone know when his contract ends with us

I attend most games and would rate Richmond supporters the worst. In my experience they are far worse than Collingwood. On Sunday I noticed that when the umpires entered the arena they were loudly booed by Richmond. I was a bit surprised and to my recollection this does not happen with other teams. Can someone correct me here if I am wrong. I just haven't noticed it before. If I am correct, then the majority of their supporters have a fixation that the umpires will be biased against them even before the game starts. No wonder i call Richmond supporters feral.

It was so good Essendon winning. I don't have to barrack for them against us now.

I spoke to Holland on Monday and he told me he was definitely playing this week he may have hurt his shoulder at training I guess He also said Newton would play

Well he is lucky not to be dropped is he. Malthouse gave him best on ground last monday night. I don't think this topic needs further discussion

I even got interviewed by 7 news. Yea that ugly head talking about a miracle was me

I opened this topic and it has been interesting reading everyone's comment. A lot of you have misunderstood my point. Of course on his game he does not deserve to be dropped. I love watching him play. But I am talking about the future. I want to get rid of the old " close enough is good enough " attitude of the players. Leigh Mathews would not tolerate this attitude. I don't care if it costs us a win next week. I see this as an oppurtunity DB to really make a statement. We must be competitive each week and therefore we cannot afford selfish acts nomatter who they are.

For most of the game Yze was one of our best players. But as a team leader his last two kicks were very disappointing. It was right in front of me and both times he had a free player in front of goal. The coach must make a statement that this selfish act is not acceptable. Even though he was one of our better players he must be dropped for at least one week. Anyone agree

He is injured will play next week

Spoke to Holland this morning at Federation Square He says Newton has been injured but will play next week

Early on I noticed one of our players give a handball but not run on to shepherd. I thought this a bit strange so I made a point of keeping my eyes on the person giving the handball. I was shocked to see that this happened a number of times. This is something very basic as it gives the ball carrier an extra few metres. Did anyone else notice this

I get sick of comments like that about Bruce Have a good look at the replay and count how many kicks hit the target. there were many correct disposals. His problem is that when he makes a mistake its a big one so everyone remembers it. He is our co captain and therefore needs our support not comments like yours.

Bruce had an Ok game for me, he made three disposal errors. But he had 10 contested possessions, I repeat 10 contested possesions. These are the possessions that count I never reply to yzemagic as he has no football brains I will reply to you this one time only as you are as brainless as him

Think its the end for Jamar I hope yze gets a run

We are being crucified by umpires or is it just me being frustrated

Bartram is picked in first 18 so will not be dropped Jamar has played his best two games ever, been fantastic as you say but you still want him dropped. Well I have always thought him to be hopeless but I would never drop him now. He has the chance to prove us all wrong and I hope he does

I did not open this post to have a whinge about the umpires. I opened it to explain my admiration for Stynes. He knew it wasn't a goal but i have never heard him mention it. I do not have that anger management skill. I would tell the world

I taped footy flashbacks from last sunday and just watched the last quarter. This was the first time I watched it since 1987. What caught my eye was Stynes complaining to the goal umpire after Kennedy kicked a goal in the last quarter. The slow speed clearly shows it being a point. Stynes talks about the 15 metre and accepts total responsibility. I was surprised he did not mention the incorrect call by the goal umpire. I was pretty impressed by that because if it was me I would let the world know. Stynes for President.

My point is that the two coaches both agree that Carazzo was best on ground. I would assume they know the game better than me. Therefore the possessions were influential or special otherwise he would not have been picked best by coaches. I would have to add you to the list of people with little knowledge of football

Your comment about Carazzo confirms that your knowledge of Football is quite limited. The coaches of Carlton and West Coast picked Carazzo as second best on the weekend. I will continue to read your posts as I like having a laugh. Its quite funny reading comments written by someone who knows little about football ( but thinks he does )