Monbon

T'was tongue in cheek. How did it get there, that is the question?

You are a plagiarist: but I forgive you. I said the same about Maynard in an earlier post...

And Building 7 was just collateral damage...

Rollinson's posts ought to give you an insight that this is why it takes 4-5 years to become an apprentice lawyer, because they teach you each and every way known to the human species to lie, obfuscate, twist words, play semantics, twist facts, and basically to deceive. This appears to be what was rolled out - again- tonight. It is the paradigm for the absolute fraud we call Westminster Justice.

Sounds more like we need a Trump or a Biden Troll...

Just one show look at the replay should make it a case of Bull...t, 3 weeks, stop wasting our time. Yep. 'looking at the ball the whole time? What ball was he looking at? Brayshaw's eyeballs?

As the commentator said: it was a 'square up' for an earlier incident on Viney. These are precisely the acts of brutality which need to wiped out: hence Maynard's case should be the line in the sand : NO MORE!

Mea culpa: got my Toms cornfused.

This is typical of the Dutch who have always tried to ingratiate themselves with the Germans because they were never taught to speak German properly. ( That was a German joke, okay!.)

It was reported by the Browne creep, who is, apparently the son of the E Colli Wobbler President.

Coincidently, I recalled this incident this morning. I watched it very early in the morning from a TV in a farmhouse in the Parish Of Boohmanoohmana, rugged up, covered in a sleeping bag - it gets cold at night along the mighty Murray - barracking for the Germans, as is my wanton. When Schumacher charged and felled Battiston I was appalled and nauseated that Schumacher got away with it - not because Battiston was also a Melbourne player, but because that's the kind of fella I am.

Are you referring to 'as thick as bricks'?

Please, please, per favore, bitte, don't make assumptions. I have meant to ask are you related to Trevor Rollinson, who I used to watch . I know the name of most Melbourne players - indeed from 1960 until the late eighties used to watch Melbourne play regularly. I began to follow them when I went to my grandmother's house one Saturday in September 1958 when I was eight. A game of football was on the tellie and I began to barrack for the losing team - part of my 'sympathy for the underdog' nature - and, of course, it was the Grand Final. I knew absolutely nothing about Aussie Rules at that stage, being the son of migrants who arrived in July 1956.

Obviously given up on saving his remaining brain cells...Assuming they found one.

Um, after your pdst to me about 4 times...Glad we're back in the same corner.

Let's leave Little Nicky out of this. He's a first class footballer, son of another great. He has noting to do wid did discussion, see...

Dear Fellow Pell Despiser: You are coming across as a Magpie Troll.

Which God are you referring to? Glad we agree about Pell- we have 2 things in common now...

Yep, 'rules based order' what a tragic joke that term is.

Now I know you were really a lawyer!!!!!

I only have to refer to the Pell stuff to know exactly what you mean. In other words, if this is the third arm of government - as though the first two arms aren't ridiculous enough -God help us!!!!!

Yep: when the word 'smother' comes up, I associate a player standing next to or close to the kicker pushing both arms down towards the kicker's boots. In other words, if you're a few meters in front of the kicker and you turn your shoulder into the oncoming kicker after he has kicked the ball is simply assault in my book.

I totally agree with you: the perversion of Law and Justice is the bulkwark of our society.

Must have been: that's OBVIOUSLY why he ran into and assaulted Maynard.

And nothing is changed.