Jump to content

DemonFrog

Life Member
  • Posts

    5,025
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DemonFrog

  1. 1 minute ago, Earl Hood said:

    Nothing about the shirt per se Defrog, I was in fact wearing similar colourful, tropical shirts during my recent I'll fated missions to Cuba and Mexico where such garb is expected. But this is not the case in a place such as Melbourne. Black is more the fashionable colour here in our sub, sub tropical climate.

    Now Perth is different, I don't know what the fashion is over there, are Hawaiian shirts the in thing in Cottesloe these days?   

    I have a wide collection of colourful Hawaiian Shirts myself, but I don't live in Perth.

    Hawaiian shirt are suitable for all occasions and locations.

  2. 3 hours ago, Chris said:

    True to a degree. But;

    • If the reports are true Billy has been betrayed by his wife and best mate, he has every right to be angry  
    • If they wish to be together then that comes at the cost of their friendship with Billy, they can chose one but not both
    • Billy being angry and cutting himself off from them is not controlling, it is Billy feeling rightly aggrieved and looking out for himself and his well being.
    • Billy's comment about not seeing the end coming is not an uncommon one in marriage breakdowns, usually from men.

    You are right in that it is no ones business if they are together but you can't claim people close to it have to be happy about it. 

    Point 1 - I would agree but has Garry, Billy, Nicky or Melissa confirmed this to be true?

    Point 2 - Only because of Billy's attitude.

    Point 3 - Disagree, because the cutting himself off is a controlling action. Do what I want or else I will do this action, appears very controlling to me.

    Point 4 - I have no knowledge about this statement being true or not. Are you able to provide any additional evidence to support this comment or is a personal opinion?

    I never claimed everyone would be happy about the relationship. But all I am aware of is that two mature consenting single people want to have a relationship. 

  3. Just now, daisycutter said:

    if you know so much, df, you should be a journo :lol:

    You your the one commenting on an alleged 4 years affair.

    I could not leave your comments unanswered.

    The only people who should care about this relationship is Garry and Nicky.

     

    • Like 1
  4. 28 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

    there is discussion in the press that the "relationship" may have been going on for 4 years i.e. when both still with partners

    whether that is a fact or not i do not know, but if true it would paint a different picture

    slobbo in today's hun also comes to brownless's defense and has a lot of bitter-sweet things to say about gary. needless to say it is a typical rambling, all-over-place article that leads one to believe it was written (like many of his pieces) in the pub. I won't link the web version because it seems to be a lot shorter than the print version. maybe it has got redacted

    The media has such high standards that the four year old affair must be true!

    Brownless needs to stop trying to control his ex wife's life by dictating who she can or can't not see. She is now single and can see anyone she wants to.

    The classic statement from Billy was he was not aware of his marriage issue until his wife left him. From this statement alone it is easy to work out who was number one in his life.

     

     

    • Like 2
  5. 13 hours ago, Earl Hood said:

    Cheap hotel rates in cyclone season BBO? Or are you tenting it, if so watch out for crocs on the move? 

    Our BBO loves his comforts as well as standing out from the crowd.

    p1.jpg

    article-0-0C13EF94000005DC-368_638x428.j

     

     

     

  6. I always thought he was a club champion. As such, he should deserve a certain level of our respect.

    No hatred here. Although I was supporting another AFL team during his playing days.

    Did however have the same question about why some of our fellow DL posters appear to hate Neitz.

     

  7. 1 hour ago, jnrmac said:

    Wow Just read Beveridge's comments:

    Beveridge hit back at suggestions the players should have said something at the time.

    "Anybody who steps out of line or is a boat rocker probably doesn't last that long," he said.

    [The AFL players are all just sheep who follow their past player idols, therefore they have done no wrong. And if you do raise a voice you wil be punted out of the club - nice. Mind boggling comment]

    "The Essendon players have been treated like a European cycling team who should know better.

    [Why should the EFC be dofferent from nearly every other sport in the world?]

    "Well, no, they shouldn't know better because they had no grounding to work from."

    [Well what re they doing on their 20 hours of lectures on drugs every year?]

    I thought that I had read somewhere a statement from the golden haired one that the injection program was entirely voluntary? 

    If my memory is correct then the players had a choice if they wanted to participate in the program.

    This fact also makes it interesting to know why they had lied about not having injections to ASADA. 

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...