If Jack Watts wasn't Jack Watts, not much would be said about him at all. As Master Demon observes - some good, bad and ugly: this is true with most players, most of the time.
We praise or attack performances by the team or by individuals on the basis of how much was 'good' or 'bad' or 'ugly'.
So far, Jack isn't much of anything - he had two chances, at the end of quarters, to make a hero of himself, but couldn't; there were a few blunders and fumbles elsewhere, but he got some valuable possessions and disposed the ball fairly efficiently.
As I said, if we didn't have such a high expectation, we wouldn't bother having this thread.
I can only hope that optimists are right.