Jump to content

Viney12

Members
  • Posts

    397
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Viney12

  1. Cause they've never let us down in the past..?

    If their judgement is never to be questioned then why have a place like Demonland at all? We can just obligingly bow to their every decision.

    I realise it's a bold statement to assert that Gys will be a star, but I'm still making it. I'll be sorry if he is traded at this stage. I'd like to see him go another year after a full pre-season. I also think f we can't get the best out of someone of his proven ability then that's cause for some concern. There is some sort of onus on the coaching staff here. It can't all be heaped on the player.

    No, I'm not saying they shouldn't be questioned. But PREVIOUS FDs have let us down. The CURRENT FD hasn't had enough time to do so yet.

    I'm more saying it, because lately, every single time a player gets mooted as being traded

    "he'll be a dead set star there" "he'll dominate there" etc etc

    I've just heard it SO often lately

    So many people seem sure that our ex players will be stars elsewhere

    Trust in the current FD to weed out excess baggage

    They've done a good job so far

    EDIT: also,on your last point. Ego and attitude have killed many a "potential stars" career - sometimes it is just attitude

  2. It looks a good deal but this one will bite. Gysberts will be a star.

    This kind of throw away line always gets me

    If he will be a star, no questions asked, the FD wouldn't look at

    a.) moving him on and

    b.) moving him on at what appears to be for bargain basement prices

    Surely the FD would have a better idea about a players potential star qualities than we would?

  3. But then the conversation turns to two other potential recruits. One has superior endurance and skill, but the other is harder and tougher.

    Neeld interrupts. His verdict offers the clearest insight yet into where he wants to take this club.

    "Eighty thousand people, Queen's Birthday, Collingwood, Dane Swan belting the s--- out of us, who are you backing when the heat is on in the middle of the ground?" he demands.

    The answers are fudgy so Neeld interrupts again: "I'm going with the grunt."

    From here

  4. Neeld was the one that had the ultimate say in drafting Taggert.

    I'll find the article, but at the time it was being discussed with the selection at pick 36.

    Prendergast tossed up a names, Neeld says something along the lines of "I'll always go with grunt" (referring to Taggert)

  5. Just a hypothetical after hearing Neelds comments this morning that we have enough kids, is Dom Tyson better than Wines/O'Rourke/Toumpas/Grundy.

    Would the club trade Pick 4 for him?

    Not something I am in favour of doing at all, but was just asked the question by someone at lunch when he mentioned Tyson wants to head back to Victoria

    Tyson has strong ties with Richmond (I believe his old man is the head of the coterie group

    I think if he comes back it will be to Richmond

    On the hypothetical, I'd be more inclined to grab someone in the draft

    It's not as though Tyson has had years of development pumped into him and ready to go, plus it'd take a while to get the GWS stench off him

  6. Don't stress yourself V12, it's most likely not right, but this is hypotheticals to the GWS offer,,, If things were top be.

    Would you trade Jamar for anything?

    Wasn't having a go at you at all by the way, I've just been reading it here and there

    Nothing to do with the GWS hypotheticals

    Everyone's tradeable in my book, for the right deal

    However, you'd have to make sure you're getting a worthy replacement

    For example, at the moment and for what we know about the top 3 / 4 draftees, I don't see much use in trading someone like Trengove for pick 2 when we don't know if Toumpas etc. is any better

  7. OK star is a bit overs but he would be a very handy player for them. His cameos would likely be more frequent when surrounded by Lynch and CLoke and with him not taking a decent defender,

    Just sayin..

    Likely this and Likey that, that's all Melbourne has been for the last decade

    A PROVEN Key Forward is infintely more important than a mid sized cameo playing forward

  8. A FITTER, bigger and stronger Lucas Cook is desperate to prove Melbourne wrong and transform into an AFL player at a second club.

    http://www.dailytele...4-1226493750429

    Cook, the under-18 All-Australian centre half-forward, is set to be delisted by the Demons after just two years on their list.

    The Dees used the No. 12 pick in the 2010 draft to snag Cook but never handed him an AFL debut.

    The Ballarat product has been training every second day since the season finished in a bid to earn a second chance and, with a trade unlikely to eventuate, is set to become a delisted free agent on November 1.

    That means Cook, 20, can sign at the club of his choice. The delisted free agency period spans until November 13, before the second official list lodgement.

    “It’s safe to say he’s not going to be at Melbourne next year. The signs aren’t good that good that they want to keep him,” Cook’s manager Marty Pask told SuperFooty.

    “Right now he’s training really hard, he’s put on 3kg and he’s got a pretty extensive weights program he’s gone and got some assistance with.

    “He has some interested clubs that are in the need for a key-position footballer. Some have expressed interest in him playing as a centre half-back, others as a centre half-forward.”

    I'm not fussed whether we trade / delist Cook, I don't see it in him personally, but this pisses me off

    He would've had the best programs and equipment at his disposal, yet NOW he decides to seek assistance with his weights

    Baffling

  9. Why do you think I listed those players mate? Sheesh...

    I'm sorry, you've gone from bemoaning the fact we've been "quiet" on day the 1st 2 days of FA to....actually I don't even know what you're bitching about anymore

    • Like 1
  10. Sure other clubs have been silent, but we're in desperate need of quality players, especially if it means NOT giving up our draft picks.

    Not including the draft, I would have liked to have got via trade/FA:

    -Tippett

    -Caddy

    -K Stevens

    -Byrnes

    -Wellingham

    Realistically, I think we'll get Dawes, Byrnes, and maybe one surprise. Depending on who the surprise is I'll be either satisfied without being happy or underwhelmed.

    We can't keep relying on 18 year olds from the draft, we NEED players who have played 100 games +

    WE haven;t been silent though!

    We've been vocal!

    Byrnes toured our facilities today

    Tippett realistically will go to QLD

    Re Caddy Dawes Wellingham here you go

    Are happy now?

  11. Incorrect. If you were paying attention, I said I don't like trading for contracted players. So who's moving the goal posts?!

    I misread

    You're still ignoring the facts that it's day 2

    Many other clubs have been silent

    We've been far from silent

    Weve been linked to NUMEROUS players

    Wellingham, Dawes, Pearce, Monfries, Byrnes, Rodan, Lynch, Caddy and so on

    What more do you want us to publically do simply to appease impatient supporters?

    Sign a few FA's day 1 just for the sake of it

    Give me the definitive list of who you want us to trade for / get under FA

    • Like 1
  12. Mate you were asking about those teams so I gave you an answer.

    We are in desperate need of quality players and SO FAR I'm pretty disappointed about what's known of our efforts.

    I was talking in reference to FA which is what you were bleating about

    You even stated you don't want trades as you want to keep draft picks

    Don't change the goal posts

    You said EVERYONE was having a crack

    Mate - we've been linked with nearly every single out of contract FA / Player at some stage in the last couple of months

    Don't act as though we're doing nothing

×
×
  • Create New...