Vandenberger With The Lot

3 hours ago, Nasher said:

Purple isn't even trying to be credible any more

To be fair, we've attributed the rumour that apparently "started with him" with as little evidence as well

9 hours ago, Roger Mellie said:

How could you ever contemplate changing Raul Poos?

With an extremely heavy heart

Just now, stuie said:

Yes "Vandenberger With The Lot", I enjoy football.

Feel better?

PS - What were your other user names here?

 

My username has always been the same. My Display name was previously Raul Poos

15 minutes ago, stuie said:

I didn't start this thread. Not sure why you want to single me out out of all the posters who have commented?

Not sure you've seen the posts here simply directed at me and not the actual topic?

Although I've come to expect the worst from Demonland over the years...

 

Just an observation, though you still didn't answer the question. Do you actually enjoy football?

3 hours ago, stuie said:

Ohhhhh so it's only certain types of information sent specific ways that should be personal hey? Gotcha...

Pretty sure this is an open forum old mate. I'm free to comment on what you write as I please without you asking for my advice.

I thought you were "care factor zero" anyway?

 

Stuie I've been reading these forums a long time without a lot of posting. Do you actually like the footy? Or do you just hang for a good gossip to emerge from the football world?

Thanks mate, great report

19 minutes ago, old dee said:

She would say that wouldn't she!

As a Ninthmond supporter yes, but I was under the impression she severely disliked him over some personal issue?

 

18 minutes ago, nutbean said:

Didn't you think Lyon looked at her incredulously ( and somewhat disbelievingly) when she was suggesting that.. 

Moreso when she said she didn't know the full story, he gave a look at the camera as if to say 'Then why are you talking about it'

1 minute ago, hardtack said:

Speaking of which, whatever happened with regards to that?  Being in Sydney we don't hear too much at the best of times.

Was discussed last night on Footy Classified. The general gist is that the original complaint was fairly exaggerated, Caro said she was of the belief Martin never threatened to stab the woman

24 minutes ago, Peter Griffen said:

What rubbish, the fairest and best player in 2012 cannot also be a player who has been found guilty of drug cheating, for Jobe to keep his brownlow destroys the very meaning of the award in the first place, it shouldn't be up for discussion.

Mark my words, Jobe will keep his Brownlow. The betting company money coming into the AFL will see to it.

6 minutes ago, Chris said:

Hep, there is a table at the bottom of the findings which outlines the return dates for each player. Jab comes back a week or two later than the others due to the international rules games. There are a few others who don't come back until early 2017. 

It seems that the indigenous boys played in an exhibition match that has pushed their suspensions further out

This whole episode shows that Australia's public is still stuck in archaic times. It's 2016 and everyone is still losing their mind over a black man asking out a white woman.

The crowds this year showed some questionable behaviour towards Goodes for some pretty weak reasons.

Lets hope those same people get as vocal when Dustin gets his hands on the ball next year. Scum

See the POTY thread. He was great today.

We need to get Gawn signed up again. If he gets poached by Geelong or the Hawks I'll be furious.

No chance. Gawn is one of the players I look at and just don't see a bloke who would leave the club. Howe probably, but Gawn, no chance

A day in the life of Lance:

5.30am - Wake up, shower in innocence water

5.40am - Dress, paying special note to wear victim pants

5.50am - Breakfast - Muesli, the most just of all meals

6.00am - Start daily session reading every news publication in Australia for any reference to Prince James or Essendrug

7.00am - jump on bigfooty main board, ready to mock peasants who haven't read today's newspaper.

8.00am - begin cycling through club boards, fixing wrong opinions

9.00am - head to bomber blitz, demonland and any other club forum that puts up with me.

10am-12pm - cycle between all boards replying to some people in a circular argument we've been having for months

12pm - lunch, Wafers representing body of James, and wine, the blood of James

1pm-5pm - cycle for arguments again, paying special care to mock anyone who hasn't read ever article ever written about the saga

5pm - knockoff, meditate on James

6pm - legal aod9604 injection

7pm- masturbate furiously to picture of James

8pm - early to bed ready to go again tomorrow

Come on James, don't be so sensitive .........

Accidentally copped the estrogen injection...

Hird crying to the media about it.

Last I remember James no one ever denied injections taking place...

That was the two Voss brothers.

I could swear that dean cox said it was Joel and scooter on an afl website video last year.

Yeah I mean, he may have said it in the heat of battle. Not once the sirens gone though, and thats the vibe I was getting for some reason

If you read the comments after the initial tweet the OP replies to say it was during the game

Not sure I believe that, Selwood has mentioned in the past he respects Jonesy and they played Under 18s together for Vic - same draft class.

Sometimes a sledge can just be a sledge, doesn't have to be a legitimate personal attack.

There's a good story about Joel sledging brother Scott with "my dad slept with your mum"

Nope, don't have access. I guess it is a pile of horse s@$t.

Any chance of a summation of the delusion?

Basically noone at the club had any idea it was all Dank.

If you go to google news and search for "James Hird and Essendon’s drugs scandal: the inside story" it will bypass the pay wall

Sorry, but ridiculous post, ridiculous comments, and not even accurate. Though you're not Robinson Crusoe.

We "got in front" with 40 seconds to go. Roos sent out the message, but that's not the point - he shouldn't even have to, the players should know what to do - and probably do. But as always with Melbourne, they don't do what they should do, and don't do what they're instructed to do.

But as I posted on another thread, we should never have been defending a 4 point lead with 40 seconds to go - we had our chances, and we gave St Kilda plenty. The fault lies in poor decisions and poor execution when the decisions were correct. Mitchie and Riley in particular are liabilities in this regard. I'd love to see those "marks from opposition kicks" and "scores from turnovers" stats - we must be leading them across the AFL.

100% agree with this.

As gut wrenching as it is to lose the game in that fashion, our fourth quarter we looked like a team who was afraid of losing, not like a team who wanted to win. So many wasted opportunities in the fourth.

I will never understand the management at this pathetic excuse of a ground

Level 1 is empty but they make everyone sit up in the heavens.

Great for atmosphere.

I loath this ground!

That's surprising, the ticketing bloke offered a mate of mine tickets on level one for the same price as GA when we came in

whilst being the best option we have currently, the WADA code is flawed in a number of key ways

This is a legitimate question, why do you day in day out post on the internet flying the flag for the club?

Like what do you personally get out of dealing with people trolling you all day?

That's the thing that concerns me. A sports scientist arranges for drugs to be supplied by a Chinese manufacturer who produces TB4 i.e. the "bad" Thymosin and the Tribunal which claims to be comfortably satisfied that the players didn't ingest the "good" Thymosin can't conclude that the sports scientist injected the product that one purchases from that manufacturer. They simply don't know.

It's like going to the milk bar, asking for a bottle of milk, getting a bottle with white liquid that has all the attributes of milk and the court saying they're not comfortably satisfied that you purchased milk.

Redleg who has years of experience in the court system will tell you that judges who determine cases will sometimes pluck decisions like that out of their proverbials when it suits them.

The best way I've heard it summed up was:

1,2,3,4,_,6,_,8,9

We all know the missing numbers are 5 and 7, but you can't prove it so Essendon aren't guilty

Silly by Clarkson, but really sick of people acting like [censored] idiots treating coaches and players like displays in shop windows to be toyed with.
You act like a [censored] idiot, don't be suprised when someone hits you.