Return to Glory

Probably says a fair bit about Beveridge to be honest.

And I agree with others regarding the rising star. Very hard to see how Daniels missed out. For mine the bloke's just an exceptional talent.

I was wrong. I was wrong about Tom Boyd. He may look like a Wall Street stockbroker in waiting but he played with passion, grunt and skill last night.

Well aren't the Meth Coke huge pretenders.

Loving this.

Of course it's hard to go past our crime luminaries. With the game spreading to China, I do see a role for Sam Dastyari within the club. I'm just a little short on specifics at this stage.

To paraphrase Praha, he dumped us when a better offer came along. He went doctor shopping for a GP or Psych who could, with a straight face, say that he could sit in clubrooms that were white and blue rather than red and blue. User.

Mitch proves you can have mental issues but also be a self - centred [censored].

I reluctantly suspect you may be right SWYL. It would be hugely disappointing if that were to be the case but remember that very few players are irreplaceable. Buddy is the most obvious recent example of this. I would love him to sign prior to the season proper.

If she doesn't allow you to commit to the Demons 24/7 the relationship is pointless. PS - I've gone to the spare room to secretly make this point to you...but that's not the issue.

Why have one Saty when you've got the Commodore 64 ready to spring into action.

If the AFL had some balls they would pull Whitfield from the game.

I like the Wilson article. The AFL has sat on this for a year. They must have known about Allen's involvement and, in turn, what did Collingwood know?

I'll only answer once PF.

Do you really need to ask PF? The only question to now be answered is how much of a cover up is it? I.e. AFL complicit.

No doubt. If it was established that he avoided drug testers, he should not be playing. I'm sure there may be reasons to feel sympathetic but it shouldn't alter the outcome.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/lachie-whitfield-case-afl-probe-into-gws-giants-raises-disturbing-questions-20160830-gr4tji.html He should not be playing on the weekend. Simple. This stinks.

I don't get it (I may just not be so bright) If the AFL has investigated for an entire year why has there been no decision? If he does play and it's found that he was avoiding a drug test, what does that mean in terms of results of finals? Am I missing something here?

So am I right in thinking that it's taken the AFL an entire year to investigate. Has it come to light via the AFL or another party?

Makes Levi Casbolt look like a dead eye dick. Close to the worst kick I've ever seen. No

In terms of the first handful of games my preference would be in this order: Round 1 - Richmond (H) Round 2 - Richmond (A) Round 3 - Richmond (H) Round 4 - Richmond (A) Round 5 - Richmond (H) Round 6 - Richmond (A)

Wow

Ankle bracelet

AFL's plaything...nothing will happen

Let's hope the AFL shows some backbone.