Jump to content

binman

Life Member

  • Joined

  • Last visited

View Profile Find content

Posts posted by binman

    1 hour ago, Lil_red_fire_engine said:

    Jeffersons game time tonight was better than his recent two 5 goal hauls. His marks were commanding and clean his attack on the ball and man was improved and his kicking well executed. More of this please El Jefo.

    One of the better games I have seen Verrall play it was like watching a young Grundy. I do worry he is a touch too small to make it as a ruck and has shown little elsewhere but hope his development continues in the second half of the year.

    Vefy much reflectsup my thoughts on both players.

    I'd add about Jefferson that his second efforts have really improved in the last few weeks, and we're good again last night. Still dont look instinctive, perhaps because they're not, but he's clearly working hard in that area, and on his contested work, and I love that (ie players working hard to address weaknesses and making good progress)

    He is a genuine old school forward who reads the ball super well, knows where the drop zone is and uses his body deftly.

    It was great to hear Ben Brown's comments about Jeffo, in particular that he has been working on his aeriel contest work, the implication being he needed to, in particular halving contests and getting the ball to ground (which brown noted is critical for key forwards).

    Jeffo was better in that regard, but still needs to improve. That should come though as he gets physically stronger.

    • Like 8
    • Thanks 2

    1 hour ago, Kev said:

    Not sure about the idea that we are better off as a club.

    If we were, wouldn't we have been playing for the potential of being a finals contender. We are basically out, and the writing was on the wall very early, zero and five.

    Tracc has been good, but he wants to win trophies, he wants big crowds, our club doesn’t match his aspirations. He hasn't been holding us together, Max has.

    We are a fractured club. We signed up another big contract, which haven't served us well in the past. I hope that changes, but just can't see it.

    I don't want to get into a back and forth kev, but I would argue the evidence contradicts the idea we are fractured club.

    The most compellingu evidence is how many players have resigned their contracts in the last 12 months, several of whom, like koz, did not need have to do so as their contract had not yet finished.

    In addition to the young players I listed above, Lever, Maxy, Viney, Langdon and now Koz have all resigned or extended their contracts.

    That's more than a quarter of the list recommitted to the club in the ladt 12 months.

    in fact only one player chose to leave in that time - nibbla, who left for family reasons and was at pains to say at the BF how much he loved the club.

    Theres just no way that many players recommit if there is fractures or the environment isn't supportive and positive.

    As for long contracts not serving us well again I respectively disagree, foe reasons I've already articulated.

    But we will of course see.

    But leaving aside tbe debate about koz's contract, I think we can.both agree just how awesome it is that he is staying at the club.

    I was, and remain so, just so stoked when I heard the news. I felt like a kid again. Love it

    • Like 6
    • Clap 2

    48 minutes ago, Kev said:

    The big contracts cannot be bought, unless the seller pays some of the cap.

    So that a good thing in Kozz's case then -another club cant turn his head with a big offer.

    Certainly was in traccs scenario - the $ we are paying tracc couldn't be matched by other clubs and, as I argued at the time, that made it extremely unlikely that a trade would/could be done - even if tracc really wanted out

    And now we have tracc playing great footy, in a great headspace and showing great energy and leadership- so much so that fir the first time in his career people are talking about him being our next captain.

    Moral of the story- long contracts of gun players are a net positive for club and player.

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 2

    ·

    Edited by binman

    14 minutes ago, Kev said:

    The contracts have become meaningless. The small contracts can be bought and if we don't match them, chance they will go.

    The big contracts are problematic, others cannot afford to buy them, Tracc as an example, does he really want to play for us especially if we continue in this unsuccessful mode. The big contracts are usually back end loaded. As they age, and become good role players or retire injured, we are stuck with big cap fillers. I would rather us be like Geelong than Richmond, and hold the core together, with aging stars sacrificing some salary at the next contract negotiation, for a chance to take the lollies. I love the loyalty. The whole reset of the team doesn't seem to work well.

    Calling out for the lobotomiser's.

    Wish I was a group think.

    You are contradicting yourself kev.

    If contracts are meaningless then why do yiy have a problem with the length of Kozzie's contract.

    Sure it's great to not blindly buy into the consensus view.

    A handful of posters, me included, pushed back on the seeming consensus on DL last October and November that our culture was terrible, we were a rabble, that it was a fait accompli we would lose trac, Oliver and after the 2025 season koz too.

    The minority view proved to be the correct one.

    But often the consensus view is in fact the correct you one, and imo it is in this case - the koz deal is a total winner for the MFC.

    And ironically the Tracc example provides one reason how long contracts can benefit a club by giving us the goal whip hand in any negotiations.

    Some might argue clarry's situation provides a counter argument because it makes harder for us to trade him. But I don't give credence to that argue because it presupposes we want to trade him.

    Why on earth would we want to trade him, particularly if we can't get top end draft picks in return?

    By any measure he has been one of our best players this season and whilst still a ways of his best he iis clearly getting there.

    • Like 6
    • Love 1
    • Clap 2

    2 minutes ago, Kev said:

    I think the nature of us as humans, create an anxiety when the stratification is large.

    Look what happened to the Tigers when the chance of winning more medals was lost, and the salary was better elsewhere, no loyalty, many jumped.

    I would rather be competitive, with a chance of finals, than sitting down the bottom. That requires stability of players. If the players aren't rewarded they move.

    Good chance we may lose the middle, if as you say, we don't win. This year is shot, even with our big names. Some clubs will be after our up and coming players. Much will have to change if we are to stay a force. I believe we have missed our windows and large salaries and contracts only impact adversely.

    They didn't jump kev. More likely they were pushed.

    The tigers knew they had a one in a generation opportunity to go to the draft with an unprecedented number of high end draft picks.

    And they took that opportunity.

    They won their 3 flags. They weren't going to win another with the list they had.

    And in trading our baker, bolton and rioli they made out like bandits and are setting themselves for the next tilt at a flag.

    On your point about other clubs comimg after our 'up and coming players', the following such players have all extended their contracts in the last 12 months (meaning the koz contract won't impact our efforts to balance our cap for several years - ie these players are all locked in):

    • Turner

    • JVR

    • Windsor

    • Howes

    • Kolt

    • McVee

    • Jefferson

    That doesn't leave many up and coming players for other teams to target.

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 3

    18 hours ago, adonski said:

    Bit surprised, thought we might get Lindsay a rest

    Agree, he looked cooked.

    I reckon it is an indicator how important Lindsay is already for us, particularly in terms of struture - ie his role as a winger, which allows us to use Langdon in other roles (eg high half forward, tagger, mid).

    Windsor as sub and swapping out with Langford or Lindsay as needed.

    • Like 1

    21 minutes ago, Kev said:

    Does our society need more Brain Surgeons or GP's?

    Does the game flourish when a few take the majority of the pie?

    AFL requires a team to win, a happy team, working for each other.

    The greater the stratification the more likelihood of unrest, I reckon.

    Kev, what causes unrest in football clubs is losing.

    And the goal of every single player is to win a flag.

    Players will be behind anything that helps a team win more often and increase the chance of winning a flag - including paying one of your top 3 players a salary commensurate to their impact and ability.

    Do you really think the tigers players were frustrated they parachuted Lynch in on a massive salary to (I think I'm right in saying he instantly became the highest paid tiger, a team that had just won a flag) in order to increase their chances of winnning another flag

    The club has done brilliantly to land this deal. It's huge for the club and our chances of being a force moving forward.

    And i would be completely shocked if there was anything but support within the playing group for the terms of koz's contract.

    • Like 9
    • Clap 2

    9 minutes ago, junk said:

    Most of his team mates would be happy for him , considering that they would NOT be getting a u beaut pay rise in the near distant future.

    It does NOT matter if we put all our eggs in the one basket and it does NOT matter if we cannot afford decent key position players.

    No wonder we took 57 yrs to win a flag, we will not see another one ever.

    What happens if he becomes another Oliver ? Basically he would become un tradable.

    Cmon junk, that's just an appalling effort.

    I mean i can see that you are just starting out on your troll journey, or at least I hope that's the case for your sake, but this post is amateur hour stuff.

    I'd recommend spending some time on Big Footy. Work on your troll craft and get some troll miles under your belt.

    And work on a new posting name as to be honest that's where your problems start.

    Junk?

    Please- what self respecting troll would choose that as a nom de plume for a MFC forum?

    What about something like

    • Flower Power

    • MF Club

    • Spud Dullard's smile

    17498612433944825283584529651808.jpg

    • Like 1
    • Haha 11
    • Clap 1

    ·

    Edited by binman

    4 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

    [censored] mate... ever heard of Google!!! Not hard. Probably even you could manage.

    Get off your horse

    Why would I bother googling?

    I wasn't the one making an argument other clubs call out the AFL or umpires.

    If you want to make that case, all power to you, i await your non vibe based recollections of comments from clubs a bit stronger than 'less than cryptic'.

    I was arguing the opposite.

    So I just googled.

    And gee wiz do you know what I found?

    Zip, Nada, zero.nothing.

    Not one example of other clubs calling out the AFL or umpires.

    Jesus's wept.

    ·

    Edited by binman

    43 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

    Not going to give you time and date mate.

    I've recalled both Coaches mentioning the umpiring in less than cryptic terms.

    Maybe you can pay more attention 🤔🤷‍♂️

    Seriously?

    I should pay more attention?

    You claim Collingwood and Geelong club have called the AFL out and/or even publicly criticising the umpiring?

    But the best you’ve got is you recall 'both Coaches mentioning the umpiring in less than cryptic terms'?

    So, in other words you can't give an example of club calling the AFL out and/or even publicly criticised the umpiring?

    Just some hazy vibes and recollections of less than cryptic comments (whatever that means) from two coaches.

    No recollection of what they were actually criticising? Or even when it was? Must have been super compelling press conferences.

    By your definition goody practically went nuclear on the umpires in discussing daicos suddenly getting a spike in frees after half time and saying he hopes all players get that treatment.

    In any case I wasn't spoiling for a fight, I was simply trying to highlight that knocking the dees for not unloading on umpires Is unfair as no clubs do so.

    And when that was challenged genuinely asking for an example.

    i didn't even ask you for an example - I was responding to another poster

    iin any case, thanks for going to the effort of replying - your post has proved my point not rebutted it.

    It's just another false narrative, like how bad our our culture supposedly is, that some dees fans love to amplify.

    9 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

    I'm mates with Ryan Daniels and he believes Jackson won't be leaving Freo. He thinks they will be trading Darcy....

    Tha5a what I would do too, and i think it's probably the most likely outcome.

    But a lot depends on whether Jackson really wants out.

    If he Jackson is afamant he want out, they of course can play hard ball and keep him to his contract, but that would be a risk because nor every player is a Lachie neale which put there head down and continues to play elite footy

    • Like 2

    23 minutes ago, doomsday dee said:

    Hey Binman,just wondering what your interpretation is when someone is outta form,does that mean not many touches or a small defender taking on the most dangerous small forwards in the AFL(some are all Australian)and I would say,hasn't been beaten yet

    Sorry, don't follow DD.

    26 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

    It's been mentioned multiple times on Demonland that starting with this off season, clubs will be able to trade two future firsts. So 2026 and 2027 could be traded.

    As big a blow as it would be lose Jackson, Freo are well placed to cover the loss.

    Darcy is a terrific ruck (though his injuries are becoming a worry) and up forward they have Amiss and Traecy.

    And trading Jackson would really help with their salary cap, will surely must be an issue given the contracts Bolton, Serong, Brayshaw, Young are on and Amiss and Traecy will demand.

    Two future firsts and a decent WA player like McVee or JVR might get them somewhere close.

    If he wants out they will have to weigh up the risks of forcing him to stay - they'd want to be confident he'd perform to a high level.

    • Like 1

    ·

    Edited by binman

    BUT, if there is any sort of chance of landing Jackson i hope they do what it takes to get him - and whatever it takes might include putting JVR on the table.

    It really is impossible to replace Gawn - but getting Jackson in would be huge in terms of creating an opportunity for a succession plan

    Jackson is still young (24 in September) - barring serious injury he'll play another eight to ten seasons.

    I could see Max playing three more seasons after this year.

    That takes Jackson to 27 years old, hitting his peak, with still another six or seven seasons left in his career as the number one ruck. Perfect

    I reckon Maxy struggled to find synergy with Grundy in large part because he wants to be the man. Super competitive, he'd be happy to take every ruck contest.

    But it seemed to work better Jackson. And if they can make it work it might help to extend Maxy's career.

    Keeping Koz and getting Jackson in would be a game changer.

    All that said, how good would it be to get Jackson AND keep JVR.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
    • Clap 1