Jump to content

Discussion on recent allegations about the use of illicit drugs in football is forbidden

Prof

Members
  • Posts

    161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Prof

  1. One of my faves too, CB.

    My Geelong mates said he was soft and showy and boy were they wrong...

    If you watch the entire game, you will see an in-tune JMac get a clearance during our domination, kick the wrong way, and an in-tune Bizzell just marked it next to his bloke and moved on.

    Hope he comes to the footy, I understand he feels like a Demon, he certainly is in my eyes.

    I saw CB at the AGM the week before last.

  2. prof, as a semi-veteran demon tragic, would you give a pass to '67? came 7th i think. we pulled back from a bad situation that year, had it not been for norm smith's bad health may have done even better.

    Ed: 8 (out of 18) games decided by a goal or less that year. Must be a record.

    I remember 1967 well. Did not miss a game. Hassa Mann starred all year. After a shocking year in 1966, perhaps '67 deserves a pass.
  3. Unfortunately, as an MFC supporter, we have a lot of possible years to choose from.

    2012 to me is as bad as any other year. There were high hopes, misplaced maybe, led by a new coach and having Clark. The level of uncompetitiveness that we've managed to display at times this year has been nothing short of embarrassing, simply terrible.

    2008 was the same. 2009 wasn't much better. In terms of disappointment, 2007 was also terrible, given we'd made the semis and been the top-ranked Victorian side in 2006, but that year was derailed with injuries and the Daniher saga.

    What a happy thread.

    We had a very old list by 2007. Full of good to very good players that were now past their best, plus a few 'top up' from other clubs. Our younger players were either over-rated or non-existent.

  4. How many players at Melbourne are really good kicks? Not many.

    How many are below average? Heaps.

    This continues to be a major issue. I was watching the Swans playing last Sunday and noticed how virtually every player can spot up a player without any problems.

    Many aspects of a young player's game can be developed but very few players improve their kicking significantly.

    Look at our list:

    Jones: above average

    Bartram: poor

    Watts: very good

    Gysberts: below average

    Bate: above average

    Bennell: below average

    Frawley: below average

    Trengove: average

    Morton: below average

    Clark: above average

    Sylvia: very good

    McKenzie: below average

    Dunn: average

    Petterd: poor

    Grimes: poor

    Blease: very good

    Green: above average

    Strauss: above average

    Garland: average

    Moloney: below average

    Jurrah: very good

    McDonald: below average

    Nicholson: average

    Rivers: average

    MacDonald: below average

    Sellar: average

    Martin: below average

    Tapscott: above average

    Davey: above average

    Howe: average

    Jetta: below average

    Jamar: poor

    Spencer: shocking

    Bail: below average

    Fitzpatrick: shocking

    Magner: shocking

    It's a worry!

  5. You have my vote BBP,

    Ten kicks from Davey is worth more than 30 from Bail and 5 of his mates

    Yes, Davey is a better kick than Bail. What about ... effort? persistence? tackling? endurance? not spitting the dummy? etc etc etc
  6. Bennell, Dunne and Bate need to be axed. Magner tries hard but is no where near AFL standard. Martin should be played more up forward. He is OK. J Mc Donald will not advance our side. Nicho is servicable. He made a few mistakes today but he has pace and works hard. Bail is receiving some very unfair criticism.He has fantastic endurance and competes really well. His disposal is not up to sctratch. Move Rivers back to defence. It's a long road.

    • Like 1
  7. He's got height and he tries hard. Everything else that counts is a big thumbs down. Sorry, I just remembered. He wears the number that is supposedly 'the answer to everything'. That helps a bit.

  8. Blease was better than you suggest

    I started a post about 10 days ago wondering why Blease is not given a decent go. He clearly has genuine ability. Put him in the STARTING 21, challenge him with whatever he's not doing that you want him to do and LEAVE him there for a few matches.

    • Like 2
  9. Just answered your own question. Martin and Spencer were our only ruckmen available, and one of them would have to drift forward with there being no Clark.

    There was no choice, he had to play.

    Finally I've been cheered up! Jake Spencer 'drifting forward'. Sacre bleu!

    • Like 1
  10. I'm annoyed that Sam Blease was dropped. His form has been reasonable in recent weeks. I feel he needs more encouragement. He has a number of important attributes that our side does not have in abundance. He is quick, he tries to break the opposition lines, his kicking is OK and has the potential to improve as Sam develops more confidence. And this is my point. How can we expect Sam to really develop if we keep dropping him back to Casey after a couple of games? We bring in MacDonald who we all know is just an ordinary player with very little future.

    • Like 5
  11. At least last Monday's winner was the son of a Melbourne player.

    Do any other Demonlanders remember "Porky Sinclair", from the 60's? About 30 games and now a leading dermatologist,slightly disillusioned with Melbourne's lack of success.

    Ben's step-brother Will Slade played for Geelong.(did his Dad play for the Dees,too?.....was it Geoff?)

    Peter Sinclair Number 23. Slow but reliable. A long kick.

×
×
  • Create New...