Jump to content

Discussion on recent allegations about the use of illicit drugs in football is forbidden

Daz's Dee's

Life Member
  • Posts

    858
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Daz's Dee's

  1. Pace and marking look like his strong assets also a great chace down to stop a guy running in for goal. Nothing lost late in the draft ya just never know
  2. Pretty impressive highlights package but have to take with a grain of salt as obviously they are his best video clips. Having said that he did remind me a bit of watching ollie wines highlights package looks tough, great left boot and loves to take the game on. Time will tell but think we may have found something here
  3. Must say I'd prefer wines over toumpas
  4. Correct viney will be a demon regardless and I'm certain if the afl bend us over which I can't see happening all 17 clubs would pass on viney out if respect and allow us to take him with whatever pick we have left!
  5. If he has attitude problems as reported why would we go near him isn't that the reason a few players were traded/delisted?
  6. Only suprised about Sheahan (which we already knew last week) and Williams. Don't agree with Ricky though.
  7. You may be right rfpc but my take on it is mark Neeld had very little opinion of Martin, Gysberts and Morton and said something along the lines of get what you can for them hence why they where all traded on the last day for what you might say not very much. Only my opinion. But do you really see us drafting 5 at the supposedly not so strong end of the draft?
  8. Seriously you are making me laugh out loud. Today has been a disaster for the footy club hope this Neeld fella knows what his doing.... Does anyone have any ideas which players mark Neeld didn't/doesn't like???
  9. The real truth to this potential blunder will come during next season. IMO Wallace is just about spot on with a "C" yep we have drafted talent with our very high draft picks 3, 13 and 27 for hogan, viney and Barry (and Dawes) but hogan we have to wait. Viney will be a good player possibly great. Barry anyone's guess. But too loose Maloney, rivers, Gysberts and Morton for pick 49, 88 byrnes and pederson appears IMO to be a horrible result for MFC I don't rate pederson whatsoever Byrnes 1 - 2 years yeah cool.... Pick 49 lotto, 88 won't be used. Moloney I understand both parties views but it's a real shame player and coach couldn't work together Rivers just don't get why we let him go Morton is a frustrating player think he has talent and showed signs will be good for west coast hope he kills it. Gysberts big mistake from MFC I'm certain he will be a very good player.
  10. Haha very good. Need a laugh after another disaster in the chapter of the MFC what a joke!
  11. This makes me feel sick. Will become the worst trade mark my words club have lost there mind. Awefull
  12. What a load of crap. Would rather just keep martin
  13. Nope not alone as frustrating as he has been its hard not to imagine our talented players such as morton, sylvia and watts to name a few playing at clubs like Sydney collingwood and Geelong think most (not all) of them would be good to very good players maybe even stars. Hope we keep Morton (and Gysberts) and they develope into the players we need/hope
  14. No thanks. Would just prefer trading Martin for pick 33 while he has worth really don't see any point in trading Gysberts for pretty much nothing
  15. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere it could be hickey 26 and 46 for pick13 that sounds I little better for saints?
  16. The latest on FB believe what you like. Essendon trade us second round pick (maybe lonergon also) for Gysberts. We then ontrade that pick for pederson. So forgetting lonergon whome the bombers are rumored to be delisting anyway it's a straight swap Gysberts for pederson. I personally wouldn't touch pederson for anything more then a third round pick (49) and I certainly don't want to trade an outside mid with alot of upside (yeah yeah another one with potential) for another James seller type player.
  17. I'd be happy with pick 33 for martin from Brisbane but wouldn't be paying that for pederson surely he is Worth pick 49 max possibly even pick 63 (or what ever the pick we got from pies with Dawes trade) pick 33 should be either used in the draft or to pick up a mid? If it where a choice between Martin or pederson I'd have Martin
  18. Hawksley has been delisted I think. Hanley wouldnt be bad and not sure on banfield. They look to have a few picks to play with and are happy enough to recruit mature players my guess would be pick 23 (great for MFC) or 30 (more likely)
×
×
  • Create New...