Sir Why You Little

You Bet, We need Roy Slaven to have a quiet word with the Fink.. Come out swinging & the AFL will be wrong footed from the first hour of interrogation!

Do not underestimate Vlad...This is no joke, it will not be over in a week. The Legal Team for the MFC must be sharp as...We are going to be tested. Within 800 pages you can bet 100-200 will have grunt...That is still a lot of work. Regardless of whether it is right or wrong.

i didn't say they were more guilty. One is either guilty or not. I said Carlton & Ninthmond were far more blatant

Don may already have moved to the "War Room" with Dr. Strangelove to plan strategic moves.Neil Craig will be fine. He has done more pressers than Mclardy.

Have another look at the Kruezer Cup game and then read Wallace talking about securing Cotchin. It's all there. As for the Eagles. Have a listen to the Lynard Skynard track "The Needle & The Spoon" I am not exonerating the MFC at all, but i will always believe these other 3 clubs were far better tankers than us. Imagine if Wilson had written about Wallace's admissions in that first article? Richmond would be completely screwed. The Coach HAS admitted it.

i can't stop now. It is engrained into me. Worsfold in his White Coat Carlton just being Carltank. How i loath and detest that lousy stinking organization. I'll stop now.

I agree WJ Bring it on. The more question marks the more involved it all becomes. The deeper hole the AFL digs. Carltank & Ninthmond did far more blatant tampering than the MFC. I want to know more about Bailey's specific charge. That is the Big card in the deck.

I turn 50 this year. That is all i can cope with...

Such a shame Thomas & Wilson will not stare down each other next year...Grant would rip her apart on this one.

distinct possibility...But by recanting he may become a key witness down the track.

The Defininition of "List Management/Tanking" 2009...Let us remember to always put that date with either of those 2 words...very important. Will be the Numero uno issue for our lawyers at this stage...the recanting or back Tracking of B. Mclean should be a close second...on this point i applaud him, he may now realize just how serious those "off the cuff" remarks became. However frustrated he may have been the club played within the 2009 rules unless the AFL can prove otherwise, and it was the MFC who paid Mclean's wages at that time.

hey DC once the ball is bounced and Dawesy kicks his first goal all this court case procedure will be moved to the background. The longer it goes on the more exposed the AFL will become. It could easily go on for at least 2 years as each party is shown evidence and given time to respond. Relax brother. The Beaks now begin their trade.

vert important that Dean & the MFC work very closely on this one. I hope all personal differences if they exist are put to rest for the good of all. I was always worried at Deans last presser that he was left at that table by himself for the vultures to feed on. He should have been flanked by Mclardy & Schwab with the sponsors logos behind him. He may have been sacked as coach but until the end of that interview he was still representing the MFC. We all know what happened in reality. Iff this does drag on and get dirty the MFC must back Dean & vice versa. If there is conflicting stories the AFL will get the upper hand very swiftly.

never said it wasn't full of dross 13 but still the best plan for our lawyers is to know the document right through. No exactly when and where to attack certain sections. Not panicking at all.

800 pages is a lot of print. So who knows what the next turn will be. That is a lot of talking. Our legal boys will need to know it all verbatum.

From that i get the feeling our lawyers are pretty confident thus far. Brock retreating makes it all cloudy.

Hahaha Jimmy Saville...AAARRGH that cigar and smile Revolting..

Maurie Wilson could be right yes, but if she is right on the money a lot more would have come out by now. As it is she knows a little bit about a lot of things..and has tried to connect them with her own views. That is how i have read it from story one...i mean saying we tanked against the Aints in 09 is a joke.. They were at the top of their game that year.

No offense taken Markc....You'll keep

I see. Starting to sound a little desperate Fan if that is your best answer, I am sure there is far more to it than that one line, but it's a start. If you respect Wilson as a reporter, that's your view but when you skim over the fact that she put her own personal vendettas into that original story, which got the whole scenario rolling. That got peoples backs up, and there is little teamwork in here we are all posting individually. This investigation was always going to happen, but i refuse to sit back and watch Jim Stynes name get rolled in the dirt.

And why is it not appropriate for you to be a Mod anymore Fan? What has changed? If it has been clearly pointed out i wouldn't mind reading it.

Rubbish in hell everything will be downloaded when i want it...Hell is where it is at.. Upstairs is all regimented and dull, Ned Flanders is up there....nuff said!!

Rather Cryptic Mr. Hur.

Thanks for all the news guys. We are in good shape thus far. A year with minimal injury....please.

Cale had ample opportunities under Neeld. Listen to the interview he gave early last season to Matt Burgan. Cale was pumped. The only person who shot Cales confidence was himself.