Ethan Tremblay

I had to read his comments twice to see what the big deal was. Still can't find it.

Clearly the truth hurts...

Playing the victim card, well played Jobe. I didn't mind him a few years ago, thought he was an honest, old fashioned style workhorse player. Now, can't stand him.

It was actually today. And what does loyalty have to do with being dropped due to poor form?

"Water boy" - thought I'd get in first. Good question. He plays well when the team plays well and obviously fails to step up to the challenge. If he is to stay in the starting 22 I'd probably swap him out with Howe.

I think the problem is most posters think Watts' role is a Fyfe or Dangerfield role. His best games have been when the team plays well and delivers the ball well. Today, as a whole, our delivery especially by foot was terrible. I suppose simpletons just need a target and Watts is an easy one.

How far off is Viney?

Yawn...I've just been in 3 threads and heard the same old thing from you HH. We get it, we really do..

Agree with all.

I'd keep Pedersen in. I like the addition of Riley. With Kent out he would add some grunt and aggression.

That jokes done to death.

Have to disagree...will like brayshaw for at least another 10.

Both arms around Howe = no free. FM

How stiff was Vanders not to get the free as well

That leader just kicked a goal.

Apparently when wearing white and purple you can just drop it when getting tackled and play on

How the [censored] was that not a free against golden boy Fyfe? [censored] you umpires you bunch of biased [censored]

Not Watts.

Saw him in the rooms wearing it (on foxtel)

Seriously this sort of [censored] is getting old. Just. [censored]. off.

Scared of giving away a free?

How many weeks will Pav get for nosing Garland? Would be like getting hit with a chisel.

Pav just nosed Garland.

Not helped with stupid 50's and the umps on there side.

Does Pav's beak continue to grow?