thedirtydog24

Lacks competitiveness, agility. Straight-line runner.

His assessment on Matt Kennedy shows he writes a lot to seem informed, but doesn't know a great deal... Lots of impressive words and 'recruiting' terms...poor identification. I stopped reading there...lucky I got there after he rated Partington at 9. I assume the rest was as 'interesting'.

He's been on Curnow for longer than a week. https://twitter.com/BrettAndersonIF/status/656620967209267202 https://twitter.com/BrettAndersonIF/status/656624479108378624

Not that it matters much because he was very impressive, but it was 7 marks not 12 against the 'Ants. Took 4 against Werribee too.

Parish's lack of tackling is one of the major knocks on him.

Entirely different story and circumstance.

Because he won't be there at 3...fairly simple.

Number 18 for green was very very clean with everything he did. Skinny, but looked quick and smart.

Glad you aren't making the picks then!! Small, not quick, just an OK kick, plenty of cheap kicks in back half, not a great decision maker.

I don't think being aggressive is a pre-requisite, but being competitive is. Parish is a competitor...Jimmy and Jack are not.

Until Garland, Grimes, Bail, Terlich, M.Jones, McKenzie go, were aren't going to improve. All 25+ and are list cloggers.

Parish is competitive. Tucker has question marks and his kicking isn't as good as it needs to be as a running half back. We have so many holes. Weitering should be the number 1 priority of we can find away to let Carlton and maybe Gold Coast get ahead of us on the ladder.

I thought the first half last week was too good to be true!

He's a star. Would take him at 3 in a heartbeat.

Port delisted him so he could sign with a club as a DFA...otherwise he would have had to take his chances in the draft.