Jump to content

Discussion on recent allegations about the use of illicit drugs in football is forbidden

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 26/10/17 in Posts

  1. Lets get the Richmond doctor to take a look at him. If he gives us the nod then it's a Yes from me.
    7 points
  2. No issues with that. Home game on our home ground. A great way to start the season and test ourselves. Will be a huge turnout. Very happy.
    5 points
  3. Love these kind of posts. "(Completely irrelevant detail). 'nuff said."
    4 points
  4. I know he was very confident of another contract with the Bulldogs a few months ago. He told his player manager to organise a completely performances based contract because he was confident he was over the injuries and ready to role. source - the horses mouth I'd take him.
    4 points
  5. Round 3 - port at adelaide round 4- sydney at scg round 5 - gws at spotless round 6- Adelaide at Adelaide and finally in round 7 a home game against St Kilda at ........ Etihad!
    4 points
  6. If Crameri joins the Demons then he won't be the only player with that surname to represent the club. Ben Crameri joined the club in 1954 and worked his way up from the Thirds to the Seconds where he was a member of their 1956 premiership team booting eight goals in the Grand Final. Crameri earned a debut in the Firsts in Round 2, 1957 against Collingwood but played only one more that year before returning to the Seconds where he finished runner up in the Seconds Best and Fairest and equal second in the Gardiner Medal, despite only playing nine Seconds games for the year. Crameri played only one game in 1958 after which he joined Moorabbin in the VFA. He later coached Northcote in that competition. When Stuart Crameri joined the Bombers I enquired as to whether there was a connection between the two but I never found out.
    3 points
  7. Depth, list clogger? Here is a conservative list of who can play fwd and who kicked goals las year Hogan, Weed, Tommy Mc, Hannan, Bugg, Tim Smith, Harmes, Garlett, ANB, Kent, Trac, Melksham, Gawn, Pedersen We also have AVB coming back That's 15 players on the list and we want to add a 29 yr old coming off a serious hip injury who has had 2 years out of the game
    3 points
  8. Well done guys. Great to listen to. Two hours went by in a blink. Brilliant hearing the great man reminisce and as TPF39 mentioned above, equally good to hear he's enjoying a happy & fulfilling life. Damn that boy could play !
    3 points
  9. 6'3" strong marking medium forward who is said to be a hard runner. 29Yr old, Powerful build, experienced, but with injury history. rookie ?
    3 points
  10. I remember he kicked 6 goals on chip Frawley back in 2013.. I'd take him purely as a depth option. Definitely not the worst idea going around..
    3 points
  11. I would take the flag without the money DA
    3 points
  12. Way overs. You could probably secure Jake King for around 20 large.
    3 points
  13. Saty, Can you not remember when you meticulously reported the training sessions every couple of days until you got sick of people questioning your commitment, motives, loyalties, etc until you basically stopped reporting? At the time I didn't blame you because I thought much of the commentary was puerile and simply dumb. It is a shame to see you become one of those taking cheap potshots at others who care sufficiently to post. Frankly, I preferred the old, less supercilious version. FWIW You will be judged by the company you keep. Find better role models e.g. Old Dee.
    3 points
  14. Tigers are actually orange, black and white - don't tell Richmond fans though
    3 points
  15. 3 points
  16. When fit, Crameri's a better player than Harmes and Bugg, who were regulars. He'd also have Kent and vandenBerg covered. Melksham and ANB's form was pretty solid. He'd probably compete with Hannan for a spot. I like Hannan, and am hopeful with a full pre-season he can be involved in games for longer. Hannan's also a heck of a lot quicker when it hits the deck. I see the forward line as something like: Petracca, McDonald, Melksham Garlett, Hogan, Hannan But you never have everyone available and form dips, so I'd be very happy to rookie Crameri.
    2 points
  17. 2 points
  18. Only if he is a better kick than Watts...
    2 points
  19. Think I agree Saty and Tim Smith is really that position ( depth forward ) and bigger and younger. We can do better with our vacant spots on the list.
    2 points
  20. LOL. Did your homework as usual. One year off with a ban and the other with a bad hip injury. Read the article.
    2 points
  21. another ex Essendon who had a year off... fits the mold.
    2 points
  22. Geezus, never seen so many 'Landers agreeing with each other..... Short contract on not many bucks... not a lot to lose. I will add my "why not" to the list.
    2 points
  23. As long as we could get him on a dirt cheap contract, I'd have him as depth who can come in when we have injuries or poor form. I wonder if we've had a chat with him or if he's just marketing himself? Funnily enough I'd back Crameri to kick more goals in a season than Watts, if both had full seasons.
    2 points
  24. Yep. You're right. They got rid of Jack because he dyed his hair blue.
    2 points
  25. 1 wish home game against Essendon
    2 points
  26. Do you really understand this or are you just making it up?
    2 points
  27. Gee you really got that wrong LDC. Unfair to Jack and a very inaccurate interpretation of what PJ meant. First of all, how is Jack a mercenary? He didn't leave for more money. You know why he left so why disparage the guy with a comment like that? Secondly, PJ was simply saying that Jack was a great guy, who was loved at Melbourne and who loved Melbourne. After his time at Port was up he believed that Jack would consider himself a Melbourne man and get involved with the club. PJ also said that he was going to catch up with Jack when he was back in Melb soon.
    2 points
  28. I used to give a sh!t about the ins and outs of every trade we were involved in but then you realise it doesn't matter. Don't sweat the small stuff. If that pick we have given up next year for Lever leads to being a good pick then that is 'big stuff' but it would mean something has gone horribly wrong...
    2 points
  29. Picks after the top 10 are overrated these days. Free agency has completely changed the landscape. We've got an outstanding young core of Hogan, Petracca, Weideman, Viney, Oliver, Hunt, ANB, Lever, Salem, Brayshaw & OMac, plus others who may still come on like Harmes, Stretch, Balic, Johnstone. We don't need heaps of draft picks in the next 2-3 years, we need free agents and ready to go players to fill needs. I've got a feeling the Watts movement is a part of that with someone like Gaff a FA at the end of the year. It's time we put all our eggs in the winning a flag basket.
    2 points
  30. All I want to know is , ' Is anyone training the house down yet ??? '
    2 points
  31. The club needs to string along Peter Jackson for the next 13 years! This bloke is a very well articulated man!
    2 points
  32. Like I always said about Justin Bieber- "What a schmuck.He'll never be anything".
    1 point
  33. Interesting observation. A Father of another high profile player made the comment to a friend of mine, "Jack likes the limelight too much".
    1 point
  34. Every footballer who plays a longish career these days should be a "millionaire" at the end of it. Provided they've made some good investments with their income and not wasted it. You're a millionaire these days if you own a reasonable house.
    1 point
  35. best kick for goal yes. Best field kick probably not. I'd say Salem, Hibberd are Lewis are all better and you could make a case for garlett too. So this is 160 odd players that I rate higher than Watts. There is probably a few debatable ones but there's a truckload more that you could make a case for to be ahead of him also. Either way you look at it, we certainly aren't giving away a player that is top 150. I think 175-200 is about right. Geelong Danger selwood Hawkins Menegola Duncan Tuohy Henderson S.Selwood Gold Coast Ablett A.Hall Lynch Wright Lyons Touk Miller May Saad Adelaide Betts Walker Lynch Sloane Crouch Crouch Mckay Lever Talia Laird C.Cameron Jacobs Jenkins R.Atkins R.Douglas Richmond Martin Cotchin Houli Prestia Riewoldt Nankervis S.Edwards Vlastuin Caddy Rioli GWS Kelly Scully Shiel Cameron Ward Lobb Greene D.Smith Davis Patton Hawks Mitchell Gunston Burton Breust Hodge O'Meara Smith Roughead Rioli Sicily Port Wines Ebert Boak Ryder Gray Dixon Powell-pepper Wingard North Cunnington M.Wood Higgins Ziebell Tarrant Preuss Brisbane Zorko Rockliff Beams Martin Rich Frem Weller Blakely Fyfe Neale B.Hill S.Hill Mundy McCarthy StKilda Newnes Ross Steven Billings Roberton K.Stevens Gresham Membrey Carlton Gibbs Murphy Docherty Kreuzer Cripps K.Simpson C.Curnow L.Jones Weitering Marchbank Dogs Macrae Hunter Mclean Bontempelli Dahlhaus Johannison Stringer Picken Coll Treloar Pendlebury Grundy Adams Wells Sidebottom Howe Elliot Fasalo B.Reid Essendon Heppell Goddard Hurley Zaharakis Daniher Hooker Sydney Kennedy Franklin Hanneberry Heeney Lloyd Papley Parker Z.Jones Mills G.Rohan Rampe WCE S.Mitchell Gaff Shuey Hurn Priddis Yeo Kennedy Darling McGovern Melbourne Hunt Hibberd Lewis Oliver Viney Jones Gawn Petracca Pedersen Hogan T.Mcdonald Garlett
    1 point
  36. LOL - we actually do have a literacy program! - read like a demon http://deezone.com.au/news/latest-news
    1 point
  37. I suspect we need all the supporters we can get. Chances are anybody who cares enough about the club to ring up a radio station is a pretty devoted member. Bit of criticism, the odd hissy fit - all part of the rich tapestry.
    1 point
  38. You sure he's a real marine biologist? "The sea was angry that day, my friends."
    1 point
  39. Why? Because it ruins the narrative of the 'save Jack Watts' campaign and those trying to impugn the integrity of our footy department? Personally I think the idiot supporters ringing SEN and moaning about Jack Watts should shut up and concentrate on next year.
    1 point
  40. We played him forward in the last quarter to try and win the game against the Pies in r23, while it's a tiny sample size, he was easily spoilt and bodied into the wrong position as a lead up forward. Goodwin went one unorthodox move too far and cost us a few chances at goal. He's far better as the ruckmen that drifts forward and takes a towering pack mark once (or one and half times) a game, if that's what you mean by seeing him in attack?
    1 point
  41. Can't remember seeing much of Hardeman but know he was good but I think Ingerson should be considered as well at half back. Short time with us but I don't remember him being beaten by any forward, the consummate spoiler.
    1 point
  42. bing, at the end of the day, his papers were stamped Pick 31, 55, 103, didn't matter - he was gone
    1 point
  43. I know I'm taking the [censored].
    1 point
  44. To be an effective AFL player you need to reach a good standard for both. Throw in pure physical fitness as a third category. Hell, you could even divide that the same way, into stamina/durability versus athletic ability. If you were trying to build a metric for 'player value' based on skill v toughness, you wouldn't just add them and compare, you would multiply the two together to get your result. (Caveat - I fully understand that trying to put standardised metrics on this stuff is absurd, I am just using it to illustrate the relationship) For example; Fred Keiserkopf is highly skilled (8/10) but a bit of a damp newspaper (2/10), 8x2 = 16. Geoff McAverageish is just ok at everything, with 5/5 for both, 5x5 = 25. So you put McAverageish on the field because his effectiveness overall is a half-again Keiserkopf. But you might still draft Keiserkopf in the hope that you can push that toughness up a bit, because even 3x8 puts him at around the same value. Of course, the most recent big example of a coach trying to recruit and organise their team in separate 'streams' of toughness and skill is Terry Wallace at Richmond. That produced a string of highly skilled and quick draft picks who were never forced to develop their toughness and thus never made it as effective AFL players, and a progression of tough-nut players who could win the ball but frankly there wasn't much point them having it. I think Goodwin &co have learnt the first part of that lesson, but I still have doubts about the second part.
    1 point
  45. If that forward line was uninjured holey moley it would have been devastating
    1 point
  46. With our experience I'll happily take Norf at Blundstone in Hobart again With Plappy's experience at Casey Fields at least we'll have a coach with into and against the wind knowledge unlike this year !
    1 point
  47. My top request is: A bye the week after Rd 12 QB Monday v Pies and then a trip to either GC or Brisbane so that we can have a mid-season training camp in a warmer climate leading into that game - similar to the camp the Cats had this year. And if that doesn't come up, have the camp in Darwin leading into our fixture there - and please Dees spend the money on having virtually the whole list up there and work their butt off - local footy clinics with most players involved as well.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to Melbourne/GMT+10:00
×
×
  • Create New...