Demonland 74,561 Posted March 9 Posted March 9 The Demons started strongly but after holding a 27-point quarter time lead, were just three points in front at half time. After a third term armwrestle, the Giants took the ascendancy through the straight kicking and strong marking of former Dee Jesse Hogan who kicked 4.0 and they looked home halfway through the final term when they led by 27 points. Melbourne finished strongly with four goals but the final siren held them up with GWS up by two points at the end. Trent Rivers and Jack Viney worked hard all game for the Demons. MELBOURNE 5.5.35 6.7.43 8.9.57 12.11.83 GWS GIANTS 1.2.8 6.4.40 9.6.60 13.7.85 GOALS MELBOURNE Chandler Fritsch 2 Gawn Langdon Melksham Neale-Bullen Petty Pickett van Rooyen Viney GWS GIANTS Hogan 4 Greene 3 Daniels 2 Bedford Green McMullin Ward BEST MELBOURNE Rivers Viney Lever May Oliver Langdon GWS GIANTS Green Greene Hogan Daniels Callaghan Whitfield THE TEAMS MELBOURNE B Tom McDonald, S. May, J. McVee HB J. Bowey, J. Lever, A. Moniz-Wakefield C E. Langdon, C. Oliver, C. Windsor HF K. Pickett, J. van Rooyen, J. Melksham F K. Chandler, B. Fritsch, H. Petty FOLL M. Gawn, J. Viney, T. Rivers I/C J. Billings, B. Laurie, A. Neal-Bullen, D. Turner, T. Woewodin EMG K. Brown, B. Howes, T. Sparrow IN M. Gawn, B. Laurie, T. Woewodin OUT C. Salem (hamstring), T. Sparrow (omitted), K. Tholstrup (concussion) GWS GIANTS B C. Idun, J. Buckley, H. Himmelberg HB L. Whitfield, S. Taylor, H. Perryman C C. Ward, T. Green, T. McMullin HF B. Daniels, Jake Riccardi, T. Bedford F T. Greene, J. Hogan, D. Jones FOLL K. Briggs, F. Callaghan, J. Peatling I/C L. Ash A. Cadman, J. Fonti, X. O’Halloran, H. Thomas EMG N. Haynes, L. Keeffe, C. Stone IN S. Taylor OUT I. Cummings (hamstring) 1 3 Quote
Left Foot Snap 2,618 Posted Monday at 12:18 Posted Monday at 12:18 (edited) I was there for my annual game last year. Coldest night I have ever been in. I've had to sleep in the snow and wasn't as cold as that night. Mrs Right and I went to 'the lounge' from the MFC hospilitaly. Thankfully too, the venue, food and drinks were great, as were the level 2 seats; however, we were so cold (from Brisbane) we had to spend the second half inside. This year we have gone one better and booked for the President's club and were are taking our Son as a wedding present. I look forward to the lunch, being much warmer, and hopefully going the team also going one better. Looking forward to hopefully seeing Langford play, and to see Tracc and Clayton back to their best. I also find Windsor very watchable and if he can come to grips with halfback he we will be a huge meterage player. Excited to say the least. P.s. last time we went to round 1 was the flag raising vs the Bulldogs. I hope we emulate that result. Still trying to defrost from last year!!! Edited Monday at 12:22 by Left Foot Snap Added 3 Quote
leave it to deever 17,653 Posted Monday at 23:02 Posted Monday at 23:02 Why do ex club member always play so well v their old teams? Hogan was the difference in that last quarter and pretty much stole the game from underneath us. Is he injured ATM? Quote
DistrACTION Jackson 10,778 Posted Monday at 23:06 Posted Monday at 23:06 4 minutes ago, leave it to deever said: Why do ex club member always play so well v their old teams? Hogan was the difference in that last quarter and pretty much stole the game from underneath us. Is he injured ATM? Yes he isn't playing this week 1 Quote
Farmer 904 Posted Tuesday at 05:36 Posted Tuesday at 05:36 6 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said: Yes he isn't playing this week And I thought the key forwards for GWS were pretty ordinary v Collingwood Quote
jnrmac 20,393 Posted Tuesday at 05:47 Posted Tuesday at 05:47 6 hours ago, leave it to deever said: Why do ex club member always play so well v their old teams? Hogan was the difference in that last quarter and pretty much stole the game from underneath us. Is he injured ATM? Human nature to show them what they let go 3 1 Quote
KozzyCan 1,008 Posted Tuesday at 12:01 Posted Tuesday at 12:01 6 hours ago, Farmer said: And I thought the key forwards for GWS were pretty ordinary v Collingwood Dropped a lot of easy marks, didn't they? You'd expect them to clean that up. Had incredible delivery. Quote
Fanatique Demon 2,764 Posted Wednesday at 03:03 Posted Wednesday at 03:03 On 09/03/2025 at 17:21, Demonland said: The Demons started strongly but after holding a 27-point quarter time lead, were just three points in front at half time. After a third term armwrestle, the Giants took the ascendancy through the straight kicking and strong marking of former Dee Jesse Hogan who kicked 4.0 and they looked home halfway through the final term when they led by 27 points. Melbourne finished strongly with four goals but the final siren held them up with GWS up by two points at the end. Trent Rivers and Jack Viney worked hard all game for the Demons. MELBOURNE 5.5.35 6.7.43 8.9.57 12.11.83 GWS GIANTS 1.2.8 6.4.40 9.6.60 13.7.85 GOALS MELBOURNE Chandler Fritsch 2 Gawn Langdon Melksham Neale-Bullen Petty Pickett van Rooyen Viney GWS GIANTS Hogan 4 Greene 3 Daniels 2 Bedford Green McMullin Ward BEST MELBOURNE Rivers Viney Lever May Oliver Langdon GWS GIANTS Green Greene Hogan Daniels Callaghan Whitfield THE TEAMS MELBOURNE B Tom McDonald, S. May, J. McVee HB J. Bowey, J. Lever, A. Moniz-Wakefield C E. Langdon, C. Oliver, C. Windsor HF K. Pickett, J. van Rooyen, J. Melksham F K. Chandler, B. Fritsch, H. Petty FOLL M. Gawn, J. Viney, T. Rivers I/C J. Billings, B. Laurie, A. Neal-Bullen, D. Turner, T. Woewodin EMG K. Brown, B. Howes, T. Sparrow IN M. Gawn, B. Laurie, T. Woewodin OUT C. Salem (hamstring), T. Sparrow (omitted), K. Tholstrup (concussion) GWS GIANTS B C. Idun, J. Buckley, H. Himmelberg HB L. Whitfield, S. Taylor, H. Perryman C C. Ward, T. Green, T. McMullin HF B. Daniels, Jake Riccardi, T. Bedford F T. Greene, J. Hogan, D. Jones FOLL K. Briggs, F. Callaghan, J. Peatling I/C L. Ash A. Cadman, J. Fonti, X. O’Halloran, H. Thomas EMG N. Haynes, L. Keeffe, C. Stone IN S. Taylor OUT I. Cummings (hamstring) Two points… so close! But very different teams are playing in this match from last time. We’re likely to have as many as eight changes to the above team. Obviously McVee, AMW, Pickett, Melksham, and ANB. And I’m guessing McDonald, Laurie and Woewodin will also miss. GWS will be without Hogan, Greene, Briggs, Peatling, Perryman and maybe some others I’m unaware of. We’ll know in a couple of days. 1 Quote
jumbo returns 6,745 Posted Wednesday at 03:49 Posted Wednesday at 03:49 I think it was a freezing Saturday night One of those crowd killer games that the AFL gave us last year Sunday arvo in broad daylight, we will destroy the Giants 1 Quote
leave it to deever 17,653 Posted Wednesday at 03:59 Posted Wednesday at 03:59 22 hours ago, jnrmac said: Human nature to show them what they let go Yea it's true. Jackson has torn us up a few times. Have we had a few come to us and do similar? Would be great to capture that in some sort of bottle. Quote
leave it to deever 17,653 Posted Wednesday at 04:22 Posted Wednesday at 04:22 (edited) 1 hour ago, Fanatique Demon said: Two points… so close! But very different teams are playing in this match from last time. We’re likely to have as many as eight changes to the above team. Obviously McVee, AMW, Pickett, Melksham, and ANB. And I’m guessing McDonald, Laurie and Woewodin will also miss. GWS will be without Hogan, Greene, Briggs, Peatling, Perryman and maybe some others I’m unaware of. We’ll know in a couple of days. Cheers FD I've been trying to ascertain who has the greatest loss of talent. Hogan and TG are massive but so are KP and Anb. I think the latter is going to be a big loss for us overall for the entire season. I felt that Nibbler had an ordinary season last year by his standards and I think it played a significant part in our final position. He is such an underrated player in the comp and his work ethic is second to none. Huge loss I don't feel we have enough talent to be able to let Tracca and KP play fwd as much as we would like and unfortunately need. The fwd line looks rather sketchy for mine and like last year we will struggle to accumulate scores around the Benjamin Franklin Mark or as I like to say in my invented Aussie parlance, a watermelon. ( The one hundred dollar note). Alas speaking of food, I'm waffling now. If only we could entice a Hogan like fwd to play for us.i don't want to see Petty there again and Jvr while doing well, seemed to not really progress last year . I'm really hoping for Turner to be the surprise package this year alongside Kozzie who although unlucky needs to reign in the agro and elbow . Despite all this with Petty back where he belongs, our backline will do well and as such I think we will win this game and the two after which should set us up nicely . It's going to be a tough season. I think also our midfield will be tested. Obviously their are clouds still over the heads of Tracc and Oliver but with Max and Jv getting older, this will also be a factor and Tom Sparrow after a long time still seems in no man's land . I don't mean to sound so negative but I feel the club has relied too much on the backline for too long and hasn't been as proactive as they could have been in bolstering our midfield and fwd line. Hopefully I'm all wrong on this and we have a bumper season with a massive harvest of goals and defeated opponents. Cheers. So close now. Edited Wednesday at 04:25 by leave it to deever 1 Quote
jnrmac 20,393 Posted Wednesday at 04:28 Posted Wednesday at 04:28 Just watched the 1st qtr from last year. 5g 5b to 1g 2b the Dees were on fire in the 1st. Huge pressure and they stopped the Giants running game. This was at a time when the Dees weren't playing well so it was good to refresh the memory. I suspect they know exactly what they need to do to beat the Giants 1 Quote
Little Goffy 15,017 Posted Wednesday at 04:43 Posted Wednesday at 04:43 Interesting that the game was so close when we were in full stumbles mode, with Petracca gone, Oliver lacking impact, the forward line sputtering, and our second-tier runners ranging from Billings to Woewodin were not very effective and Windsor had his worst game for the year before copping an ankle injury near the end. Meanwhile GWS were at their peak, in the middle of a seven-game winning streak which only ended when they got the jitters for finals. #straightsets #sackKingsley Might be worth noting that their three clearance winners, with more than the rest of the team combined, were Greene (test), Peatling (Adelaide) and Briggs (concussion) so it could be a very different midfield battle this time around. Odd stat of the day; Metres gained. In Round Null, Collingwood had a very, very high 5,990 metres gained for the game, while GWS had a frankly ridonkulous 6,600. In July last year, we managed 5,200 against GWS' 5,530 - more than a kilometre less gained! Some of that will be because of the high tally of behinds for the game, but it shows a pretty clear picture that Collingwood were not able to close down GWS' preferred game, and obviously paid the price. No surprises that our game also featured a much higher (eyeballing it, about 20% difference) ratio of contested possessions. Obviously the area supporters worry about the most is our entry and effectiveness in the forward line. It is particularly concerning after, in Round Meh against Collingwood, Sam Taylor had 12 intercept possessions, 13 marks including 4 contested, and a disposal efficiency above 90%. I'd honestly say we should just put a tall tagger on him. A learning experience for Turner or maybe we swing Petty forward for that specific task. (I'm joking. I'm joking. Seriously, I'm joking. No, put the knife down, I was just having a wind-up.) 3 Quote
leave it to deever 17,653 Posted Wednesday at 04:43 Posted Wednesday at 04:43 (edited) 19 minutes ago, jnrmac said: Just watched the 1st qtr from last year. 5g 5b to 1g 2b the Dees were on fire in the 1st. Huge pressure and they stopped the Giants running game. This was at a time when the Dees weren't playing well so it was good to refresh the memory. I suspect they know exactly what they need to do to beat the Giants Yea was a crucial game. Shame we lost. We really seemed to have the ascendency up to the end of q3. Alas Gws did what we were famous for and throw a bang, bang and bang at us and the rest as they say was history. In perspective it was still a great effort from us. I mean Gws are a top side and got evicted out of finals by a goal or less in both their finals. Finally being eliminated by the premiers so there's that. I also reckon the umpiring was soft in both those finals. Will be a tough opening game but I'm hoping the home ground advantage will help. Edited Wednesday at 04:47 by leave it to deever 2 Quote
leave it to deever 17,653 Posted Wednesday at 04:44 Posted Wednesday at 04:44 Just now, Little Goffy said: Interesting that the game was so close when we were in full stumbles mode, with Petracca gone, Oliver lacking impact, the forward line sputtering, and our second-tier runners ranging from Billings to Woewodin were not very effective and Windsor had his worst game for the year before copping an ankle injury near the end. Meanwhile GWS were at their peak, in the middle of a seven-game winning streak which only ended when they got the jitters for finals. #straightsets #sackKingsley Might be worth noting that their three clearance winners, with more than the rest of the team combined, were Greene (test), Peatling (Adelaide) and Briggs (concussion) so it could be a very different midfield battle this time around. Odd stat of the day; Metres gained. In Round Null, Collingwood had a very, very high 5,990 metres gained for the game, while GWS had a frankly ridonkulous 6,600. In July last year, we managed 5,200 against GWS' 5,530 - more than a kilometre less gained! Some of that will be because of the high tally of behinds for the game, but it shows a pretty clear picture that Collingwood were not able to close down GWS' preferred game, and obviously paid the price. No surprises that our game also featured a much higher (eyeballing it, about 20% difference) ratio of contested possessions. Obviously the area supporters worry about the most is our entry and effectiveness in the forward line. It is particularly concerning after, in Round Meh against Collingwood, Sam Taylor had 12 intercept possessions, 13 marks including 4 contested, and a disposal efficiency above 90%. I'd honestly say we should just put a tall tagger on him. A learning experience for Turner or maybe we swing Petty forward for that specific task. (I'm joking. I'm joking. Seriously, I'm joking. No, put the knife down, I was just having a wind-up.) You shine some significant light on this . It makes me believe that when we play our best we are up there with the best. 2 Quote
leave it to deever 17,653 Posted Wednesday at 04:46 Posted Wednesday at 04:46 1 minute ago, Little Goffy said: Obviously the area supporters worry about the most is our entry and effectiveness in the forward line. Well said. As opposed to giants efficiency it played its usual part. Sadly the praccy game v freo didn't show any improvement in this department. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.