Jump to content

MFC statement re First Nations Voice to Parliament Referendum


gs77

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Cheap Seats said:

Yeh I get it.

But these people still vote, they have a right to be heard.

I'm not saying anyone should listen. A good system makes sure they're know as idiots not censored.

 

I never said to censor them.

I said "Democracy only works when opinions are informed. Otherwise it is just people pushing their own prejudices."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

I'm not blaming democracy, just pointing out this "everyone has a right to an opinion" is a fallacy. If your opinion is contrary to facts or logic then it is a castle built on sand and not worth giving the time of day.

On another note I have to say I find this argument that having a voice enshrined in the constitution is racist/discriminatory quite hilarious considering the history of this country. No, this won't solve everything for First Nations people and their communities but it is a step in the right direction in them achieving self determination. Will it address disadvantage of non- indigenous people? No and it's not designed to, there are other avenues and mechanisms for that. Governments can walk and chew gum, it's not an either/or proposition.

What it will do is enshrine it constitutionally so that it can't be disbanded by a future government with their own agenda. I have hope that the LNP is in its death rattle as an organisation, they are far removed from the Menzies era and are now nothing but a loose association of the far-right, mining apologists and Christian fundamentalists but if they do ever get back into government they will be unable to dismantle the voice to parliament if it is enshrined in the constitution.

Great post

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

I never said to censor them.

I said "Democracy only works when opinions are informed. Otherwise it is just people pushing their own prejudices."

You did 

But you also said stop them spreading disinformation which could be perceived as censorship. 

Mate it's all good, just a chat, I don't really care that much. It's just a thought piece nothing more.

Enjoy your crusade bringing down the evils in society.

By the way ppl have never really been informed that is a complete falacy. I mean what does that even mean in reality? 

Surely the majority take a position based on personal values over being informed. How exactly do you be completely informed on a complex issue such as this.

Edited by Cheap Seats
  • Like 3
  • Facepalm 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cheap Seats said:

I think it's a simple comparison everyone gets?

Does it offend you?

The Hitler comparison doesn’t offend ME no. 

You intimated you had to use that reference as people wouldn’t be able to comprehend you - and I attempted to make a humorous retort.

Personally, I always hate it when people push me down controversial and mildly offensive rabbit holes because of their ignorance.

I fall for it every time!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Sport and Politics has always and will always mix.

440px-John_Carlos,_Tommie_Smith,_Peter_N

My dad was an avid amature athletics compeditor and enthusiast around Peter's time always impressioned this story/event on me.

Sport is so great at uniting people of different cultures and backgrounds to come together in the true spirit of sportsmanship, that when it is combined with great humanitarian and social rights causes it enhances both.

 

Winning an Olympic silver medal in the 200m for Australia is a huge achievement.  Peter Norman was an awsome athlete in his own right, but it's because of his moral courage that I personally rate and admire him above many other prominent Australian sportsman of my lifetime.

 

Courtesy of Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Norman

After the 200 metres final, the three athletes went to the medal podium for their medals to be presented by David Cecil, 6th Marquess of Exeter. On the podium, during the playing of "The Star-Spangled Banner", Smith and Carlos famously joined in a Black Power salute. This salute was later described in Tommie Smith's autobiography as a human rights salute, not a Black Power salute.

Norman wore a badge on the podium in support of the Olympic Project for Human Rights (OPHR). After the final, Carlos and Smith had told Norman what they were planning to do during the ceremony. As journalist Martin Flanagan wrote: "They asked Norman if he believed in human rights. He said he did. They asked him if he believed in God. Norman, who came from a Salvation Army background, said he believed strongly in God. We knew that what we were going to do was far greater than any athletic feat. He said, 'I'll stand with you'. Carlos said he expected to see fear in Norman's eyes. He didn't; 'I saw love'." On the way to the medal ceremony, Norman saw the OPHR badge being worn by Paul Hoffman, a white member of the US rowing team, and asked him if he could wear it. It was Norman who suggested that Smith and Carlos share the black gloves used in their salute, after Carlos left his pair at the Olympic Village. This is the reason for Smith raising his right fist, while Carlos raised his left.

Treatment between 1968–1972

After the salute, Norman's career suffered greatly. A 2012 CNN profile said that "he returned home to Australia a pariah, suffering unofficial sanction and ridicule as the Black Power salute's forgotten man. He never ran in the Olympics again." Commentators say he was not selected for the Olympic Games in Munich in 1972 despite recording qualifying times, and was not welcomed even 32 years later at the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney. Carlos later stated that "If we [Carlos and Smith] were getting beat up, Peter was facing an entire country and suffering alone."

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Love 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Cheap Seats said:

No worries.

You enjoy your crusade, that's what freedom is about.

For me I'm just stating not everyone to agree with you 

It becomes a slippery slope when the popular rhetoric decide what's right 

Go check out what Hitler and Stalin did

godwin's law invoked; kills this thread please mods

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rpfc said:

The Hitler comparison doesn’t offend ME no. 

You intimated you had to use that reference as people wouldn’t be able to comprehend you - and I attempted to make a humorous retort.

Personally, I always hate it when people push me down controversial and mildly offensive rabbit holes because of their ignorance.

I fall for it every time!

 

Fair enough.

I'm not making any judgement about you just seeking clarity as it was you who committed on my post.

I'm sure you can understand the need for clarity rather than making assumptions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a 1967 referendum Australians voted overwhelmingly to remove racism from the constitution and empower aboriginal people with the right to vote.

Until 1967 they did not have the right to vote. Prior to 1967 the word 'race' was in the wording of our constitution  and was, in this rewording ,expunged.

This upcoming referendum seeks to return race into the constitution. The aboriginal has, currently the same electoral franchise as anybody else in this country - that is, the right to cast a vote.

What is being proposed now is, effectively, a Second Voice To Parliament. It's quite unnecessary and so I will be voting 'No'.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


47 minutes ago, Cheap Seats said:

 I agree 100%.

I don't disagree with the decision, I was merely stating that trolls will happen regardless of the forum, but I can understand why organisation would want to control the narrative of they are attached to.

The issue for me isn't stopping a forum or trying to limit  stupidity or even the bigger debate about politics and sport. There is always a risk for every organisation making declarations and splitting the supporter base 

I mean now oes the MFC support social housing issues, why stop at one issue? We all support freedom for Ukraine ( I assume) why not declare our allegiance to Ukraine thought the MFC as well?

personally I'm sure you support Ukraine as well. But do U actually know what support china gives to Russia. China hasn't imposed economic sanctions. Why is no one kicking w fuse about that? You are clearly still going to buy Chinese products, so do you really support Ukraine? 

Anyway all that [censored] aside the issue for me is that freedom is the right to express yourself, the consequences for those actions happen after the event not before.

I know we all love political rhetoric so I'll leave it there

As an asides the MFC does throw it's support behind a bunch of other social issues and causes for instance ANZAC day eve, the Pink Lady game, Fight MND, Reach Youth, depression and mental health awareness amoung others I'm sure.

While the club doesn't get involved in support for Ukraine, I think that's an issue that's significantly more remote from our supporter base than the other issues at hand, although I couldn't see that the club would take a stance anything other than being for Ukraine.  If you are going to single out China as sitting on the sidelines of this issue, then there are also a bunch of other major nations in that category too.  If anything China has at least outwardly tried to broker a peace deal between the two parties, not that I'm necessarily convinced that is it is a fair, neutral or genuine attempt.

I think some key reasons why the MFC has chosen to support this above other causes such as Ukraine, is to walk in solidarity with the numerous past and present indigenous players, staff and the broader indigenous people of Australia and I personally whole heartedly both support that and believe it to be a fair and reasonable position to take.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Flag 2021 said:

In a 1967 referendum Australians voted overwhelmingly to remove racism from the constitution and empower aboriginal people with the right to vote.

Until 1967 they did not have the right to vote. Prior to 1967 the word 'race' was in the wording of our constitution  and was, in this rewording ,expunged.

This upcoming referendum seeks to return race into the constitution. The aboriginal has, currently the same electoral franchise as anybody else in this country - that is, the right to cast a vote.

What is being proposed now is, effectively, a Second Voice To Parliament. It's quite unnecessary and so I will be voting 'No'.

https://www.abc.net.au/rightwrongs/

You might enjoy this resource on what did and didn’t happen for indigenous Australians after ‘67.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

My dad was an avid amature athletics compeditor and enthusiast around Peter's time always impressioned this story/event on me.

Sport is so great at uniting people of different cultures and backgrounds to come together in the true spirit of sportsmanship, that when it is combined with great humanitarian and social rights causes it enhances both.

 

Winning an Olympic silver medal in the 200m for Australia is a huge achievement.  Peter Norman was an awsome athlete in his own right, but it's because of his moral courage that I personally rate and admire him above many other prominent Australian sportsman of my lifetime.

 

Courtesy of Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Norman

After the 200 metres final, the three athletes went to the medal podium for their medals to be presented by David Cecil, 6th Marquess of Exeter. On the podium, during the playing of "The Star-Spangled Banner", Smith and Carlos famously joined in a Black Power salute. This salute was later described in Tommie Smith's autobiography as a human rights salute, not a Black Power salute.

Norman wore a badge on the podium in support of the Olympic Project for Human Rights (OPHR). After the final, Carlos and Smith had told Norman what they were planning to do during the ceremony. As journalist Martin Flanagan wrote: "They asked Norman if he believed in human rights. He said he did. They asked him if he believed in God. Norman, who came from a Salvation Army background, said he believed strongly in God. We knew that what we were going to do was far greater than any athletic feat. He said, 'I'll stand with you'. Carlos said he expected to see fear in Norman's eyes. He didn't; 'I saw love'." On the way to the medal ceremony, Norman saw the OPHR badge being worn by Paul Hoffman, a white member of the US rowing team, and asked him if he could wear it. It was Norman who suggested that Smith and Carlos share the black gloves used in their salute, after Carlos left his pair at the Olympic Village. This is the reason for Smith raising his right fist, while Carlos raised his left.

Treatment between 1968–1972

After the salute, Norman's career suffered greatly. A 2012 CNN profile said that "he returned home to Australia a pariah, suffering unofficial sanction and ridicule as the Black Power salute's forgotten man. He never ran in the Olympics again." Commentators say he was not selected for the Olympic Games in Munich in 1972 despite recording qualifying times, and was not welcomed even 32 years later at the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney. Carlos later stated that "If we [Carlos and Smith] were getting beat up, Peter was facing an entire country and suffering alone."

That is terrible!  This man ought to be celebrated. Thanks for sharing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rpfc said:

God knows the Australian constitution is a sacred document that has always been above racist and divisive language. 

If that were true, why did we need to amend it in 1962 to allow aborigines to vote? Or in 1967 to even count them in our population?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wonderful thing with Democracy is that every person who is going to vote "yes" or "no" has perfectly reasonable reasons to do so. Personally, I think our club in particular needs to tread carefully as our supporter base has a large mass of conservative members. The turning off of posts really irks me because the world really has become extremely soft when people give an opinion that "isn't woke enough" for media outlets. I am not talking about blatant trolling but simply the other side of an argument where people are entitled to disagree. I suspect MFC knows that it will receive backlash for this (just look at the posts where it talks about changing the name to Narrm) and just wants to avoid it. 

Good on the club for making a stand, it is their right to do so, just like it will be any person's to say no. And honestly, it really has no impact on any of our lives, my seat at the MCG will still be there tomorrow and the club will still wear red and blue. Maybe the good old saying of "if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything" is more relevant than ever now.

Go Dees - love the club always.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Fanatique Demon said:

If that were true, why did we need to amend it in 1962 to allow aborigines to vote? Or in 1967 to even count them in our population?

Mate the cough…?

The cough!

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


6 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

That is terrible!  This man ought to be celebrated. Thanks for sharing.

But, but, but… he mixed sport with politics.

The politics was the degradation of the rights of black people in the supposed beacon of freedom -the USA, and manifested in an act of congress on civil rights, and the lionisation of a man who had a dream.

But it was politics nevertheless…

Now let’s talk about apartheid and why it’s not worth a boycott of cricket games.

 

(cough)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

I don't care how we vote on this. I just want our forward line to get sorted out, for us to get back to winning consistently and for Clayton's hamstring to repair quickly 

Are you concerned the press release is distracting Greg Stafford from sorting out the forward structure? 

Or you just genuinely don’t care what the club thinks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

My dad was an avid amatTx vwry muchure athletics compeditor and enthusiast around Peter's time always impressioned this story/event on me.

Sport is so great at uniting people of different cultures and backgrounds to come together in the true spirit of sportsmanship, that when it is combined with great humanitarian and social rights causes it enhances both.

 

Winning an Olympic silver medal in the 200m for Australia is a huge achievement.  Peter Norman was an awsome athlete in his own right, but it's because of his moral courage that I personally rate and admire him above many other prominent Australian sportsman of my lifetime.

 

Courtesy of Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Norman

After the 200 metres final, the three athletes went to the medal podium for their medals to be presented by David Cecil, 6th Marquess of Exeter. On the podium, during the playing of "The Star-Spangled Banner", Smith and Carlos famously joined in a Black Power salute. This salute was later described in Tommie Smith's autobiography as a human rights salute, not a Black Power salute.

Norman wore a badge on the podium in support of the Olympic Project for Human Rights (OPHR). After the final, Carlos and Smith had told Norman what they were planning to do during the ceremony. As journalist Martin Flanagan wrote: "They asked Norman if he believed in human rights. He said he did. They asked him if he believed in God. Norman, who came from a Salvation Army background, said he believed strongly in God. We knew that what we were going to do was far greater than any athletic feat. He said, 'I'll stand with you'. Carlos said he expected to see fear in Norman's eyes. He didn't; 'I saw love'." On the way to the medal ceremony, Norman saw the OPHR badge being worn by Paul Hoffman, a white member of the US rowing team, and asked him if he could wear it. It was Norman who suggested that Smith and Carlos share the black gloves used in their salute, after Carlos left his pair at the Olympic Village. This is the reason for Smith raising his right fist, while Carlos raised his left.

Treatment between 1968–1972

After the salute, Norman's career suffered greatly. A 2012 CNN profile said that "he returned home to Australia a pariah, suffering unofficial sanction and ridicule as the Black Power salute's forgotten man. He never ran in the Olympics again." Commentators say he was not selected for the Olympic Games in Munich in 1972 despite recording qualifying times, and was not welcomed even 32 years later at the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney. Carlos later stated that "If we [Carlos and Smith] were getting beat up, Peter was facing an entire country and suffering alone."

Thanks very much for this Rbg. I had never heard of this indivual before. A great man but sad ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just skimmed through this thread while breaking my fast.

This lead me to a very clear decision. That being -

If ever, there was a thread, argument, debate etc on Demonland that I would have to be drawn over hot coals to engage in - it is this one.

Signing out.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Democracy only works when opinions are informed. Otherwise it is just people pushing their own prejudices.

Well it certainly works a lot better when opinions are informed. 

Imagine a world where the news host throws to a reporter who claims it is raining today when there are blue skies everywhere. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    POINT WELL MADE by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons had a number of points to make to themselves, their opponents and the VFL football world when they traveled up to the Gold Coast to take on the Southport Sharks in the 2022 Grand Final rematch at Fankhauser Reserve.  After living off the glory of an almost perfect premiership, the Demons stumbled after winning the opening four games of the season and have struggled in their recent northern state sojourns - their only loss in 2022 came at the hands of the Lions in Brisbane a

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    BLUES FREE FOOTY by George on the Outer

    Long time supporters would be all too familiar with the call “free kick, Hawthorn”, as umpires seemed to gift certain teams an inordinate amount of free kicks in the game. Similarly, in the Melbourne v Carlton game a 22 to 13 free kick count, was grossly out of place given the dominance of Melbourne in just about every other statistic for the game.   However, for the Blues with only 4½ wins from their 12 games, their season is rapidly heading the same way as Hawthorn, despite all the help t

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    PREGAME: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    The Demons take on the Magpies in a massive Top Four clash on King's Birthday at the MCG with over 90,000 fans expected to be in attendance. Who will come in and who goes out for this huge clash between traditional rivals at the home of football?

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 412

    PODCAST: Rd 12 vs Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 6th May @ 8:30pm. Join Binman, George z& I as we analyse the Demons win over the Blues. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human. Listen & Chat LIVE: https://demonland.com/podcast

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 54

    POSTGAME: Rd 12 vs Carlton

    It was an ugly affair on the Big Stage at the MCG on Friday night but the Demon's defence held strong holding Carlton to six goals to grind out a win and keep their spot on the Top Four for another week.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 523

    VOTES: Rd 12 vs Carlton

    The injured Clayton Oliver holds a very narrow lead of two votes over Christian Petracca in the Demonland Player of the Year Award with Max Gawn and Jack Viney tied for third place. Your votes please 6,5,4,3,2,1 in our win over the Blues on Friday Night at the MCG …

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 53

    GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton

    The Blues season is on the line and their captain and coach have been in the firing line all week. If the Dees cough this one up the media's crosshairs will do a 180 and will surely be directed at the Demons who have only won 13 games from their last 25 outings. This is a must win game for the Melbourne Football Club too.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 804

    DOCTORS AND LAWYERS by The Oracle

    We’ve seen it all before.   Club in turmoil. Coach under pressure. Club President caught up in a tax scandal. Club board not seeing eye to eye with one board member resigning amid questions about whether he was pushed or did he jump? Unrest bordering on hysteria among the supporters. Team dropping from undefeated after four rounds to 13th after ten. Allegations of favoured treatment of players. Players out of form, forwards with the kicking yips, a bruising injury list with some facing

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    WRITING ON THE WALL by Whispering Jack

    The Narrm Football Club found a second way in the space of 12 months less a day to unexpectedly lose a home game against Walyalup on Saturday afternoon. The equivalent match of last year has been described as Melbourne’s “ground zero” of 2022 where things went wrong for the club after a long run of wins that included its 57 year drought-breaking premiership triumph. Unfortunately for the Demons, the 2023 version was a case of deja vu with the Dockers overcoming a half time deficit and runn

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...