CHANGES: Rd 10 vs North Melbourne

[Superunknown 3,311]

11 hours ago, old dee said:

Only solution is buy a subscription and to hell with 7/ AFL. Of course that is probably what they want anyway. 

Channel 7 would probably prefer the eyeballs from Demons games = ads. Especially with all the goals we kick!!!oneoneno111 #amirite

Foxtel would obviously prefer you subscribe. Still a good deal (I'm on Telstra's $10/m deal until mid 2023). All of the golf majors which aren't on FTA, on Foxtel. Cycling too.

The AFL doesn't care, as long as they maximise their broadcast revenue.

Edited May 18, 2022 by Superunknown

[La Dee-vina Comedia 16,394]

11 hours ago, Fat Tony said:

The jumper clash will be bad on Saturday. 

I wouldn't have thought so. There's a lot of red in ours.

Also, we'll be the ones with the ball. The others will be chasing.

[mauriesy 6,787]

1 hour ago, Superunknown said:

Foxtel would obviously prefer you subscribe. Still a good deal (I'm on Telstra's $10/m deal until mid 2023). All of the golf majors which aren't on FTA, on Foxtel. Cycling too.

The AFL doesn't care, as long as they maximise their broadcast revenue.

The basic Kayo subscription is $25 per month for one stream. The premium is $35 for three streams. The streams can be on any devices.

I've got the premium with my two adult children, so we just organise to pay ~$11.67 each between us.

[old dee 22,847]

3 hours ago, Superunknown said:

Channel 7 would probably prefer the eyeballs from Demons games = ads. Especially with all the goals we kick!!!oneoneno111 #amirite

Foxtel would obviously prefer you subscribe. Still a good deal (I'm on Telstra's $10/m deal until mid 2023). All of the golf majors which aren't on FTA, on Foxtel. Cycling too.

The AFL doesn't care, as long as they maximise their broadcast revenue.

Correct, I am well aware that the AFL don't care their major concern is cash from media rights. All else is running a bad last. I get the sad feeling that in the new rights deal  the FTA network will get less than 7 in this deal. Only the casual viewer / poor will be watching their team infrequently on FTA. 

Edited May 19, 2022 by old dee

[old dee 22,847]

3 hours ago, mauriesy said:

The basic Kayo subscription is $25 per month for one stream. The premium is $35 for three streams. The streams can be on any devices.

I've got the premium with my two adult children, so we just organise to pay ~$11.67 each between us.

You get the money out of them? My experience is get them to open the account and I will give you my share. The reverse sees me paying most months with “ oh sorry dad I will send you the money later today” if it works for you then you have my admiration mauriesy.

Edited May 19, 2022 by old dee

[#-11TonyAnderson 28]

28 minutes ago, old dee said:

You get the money out of them? My experience is get them to open the account and I will give you my share. The reverse sees me paying most months with “ oh sorry dad I will send you the month later today” if it works for you then you have my admiration mauriesy.

Like you Old I got burnt so many times that I reversed engineered it and got one of my kids to set the account up and I pay them my $11.67 😀 

[old dee 22,847]

Just now, #-11TonyAnderson said:

Like you Old I got burnt so many times that I reversed engineered it and got one of my kids to set the account up and I pay them my $11.67 😀 

Yep the only way.

[Superunknown 3,311]

2 hours ago, mauriesy said:

The basic Kayo subscription is $25 per month for one stream. The premium is $35 for three streams. The streams can be on any devices.

I've got the premium with my two adult children, so we just organise to pay ~$11.67 each between us.

if you had the free Kayo sub whilst a Telstra mobile customer, and converted to a Kayo account, you were on $5 / mo for I think 12 months and they've extended the $10/mo for an extra I think 1 year.

[Superunknown 3,311]

1 hour ago, old dee said:

Correct, I am well aware that the AFL don't care their major concern is cash from media rights. All else is running a bad last. I get the sad feeling that in the new rights deal  the FTA network will get less than 7 in this deal. Only the casual viewer / poor will be watching their team infrequently on FTA. 

The purported Paramount+/Ten deal would see I think only 2 FTA games/week? Someone feel free to correct me

[Diamond_Jim 11,738]

18 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

The purported Paramount+/Ten deal would see I think only 2 FTA games/week? Someone feel free to correct me

Every match in AFL is on the Commonwealth anti siphoning rules

Can't see a Government allowing  7 of 9 games to go behind a paywall but who knows

 

[rpfc 27,432]

25 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

The purported Paramount+/Ten deal would see I think only 2 FTA games/week? Someone feel free to correct me

No one knows. Pure conjecture if you have read that somewhere.

[old dee 22,847]

17 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Every match in AFL is on the Commonwealth anti siphoning rules

Can't see a Government allowing  7 of 9 games to go behind a paywall but who knows

 

I thought it was only finals DJ 

[old dee 22,847]

18 minutes ago, rpfc said:

No one knows. Pure conjecture if you have read that somewhere.

Would not surprise me at all rpfc. 

[Diamond_Jim 11,738]

7 minutes ago, old dee said:

I thought it was only finals DJ 

Every match OD 

• Australian rules football
  • Each match in the AFL Premiership competition, including the Finals Series.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-siphoning_laws_in_Australia

Edited May 19, 2022 by Diamond_Jim

[old dee 22,847]

2 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Every match OD 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-siphoning_laws_in_Australia

So how come some games are not available FTA. Eg us the last three weeks?

Edited May 19, 2022 by old dee

[Bring-Back-Powell 13,128]

18 hours ago, old dee said:

Happy to be wrong with this, I checked FTA channel 7 for our game on the weekend and we are not being broadcast. The premiers and not seen again on FTA for two weeks in a row. Why bother with FTA get a subscription and get every game. So much for sponsors getting more coverage. Yes I know we playing the last team on the ladder. 

In fairness, only 3 out of 9 games are televised on FTA most weeks so the odds are high that we're going to have quite a few weeks on Foxtel.

Although 5 weeks in a row is quite stiff.

 

[Diamond_Jim 11,738]

Just now, old dee said:

So how come some games are not available FTA. 

You need Govt approval to depart from the list.

It is often given if the package is "right"

For example the Govt approved Cricket Australia's request for ALL ODI's involving Australia going behind the Foxtel paywall as of end 2021.

The anomaly is that digital streaming is outside the rules. It only applies to cable. Notwithstanding you'd be a brave code to breach the spirit of the rules without a nod from Govt

[Doug Reemer 900]

In: A 3rd win in a row against the poos. (15 to go to get these bastards back!)

Out: Who Cares! 3 more until we break our longest winning streak against  the pies on QB!!

Edited May 19, 2022 by Doug Reemer

[old dee 22,847]

1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

In fairness, only 3 out of 9 games are televised on FTA most weeks so the odds are high that we're going to have quite a few weeks on Foxtel.

Although 5 weeks in a row is quite stiff.

 

Doesn’t seem to apply to the Dogs

[Guest]

Just jumped through some hoops to shut down my Kayo account, because I'm currently overseas. It inspired me to close my Amazon and Uber Pass accounts as well, and then remembered that I also had some sub-accounts through Amazon - none of which I have used for over six months. All in, I think I have thrown over $500 against the wall, because I'm socio-economically stupid and lazy. It's the old gym membership play. I think there should be some law against it. 

[WalkingCivilWar 31,366]

22 hours ago, Skuit said:

why humans have pom-poms on their beanies? Like what's the function and when did it become a thing? 

 

21 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Must say I normally cut them off but you are right it is one of life's biggest mysteries

Pom-poms are purely ornamental. 

During WW2 when there was a dearth of pretty much everything - in this case ready-made clothes - women would knit garments since wool was cheap and relatively accessible. Further, knitted garments, when no longer serviceable, could be *unknitted, in a manner of speaking.

Not wanting to waste anything, leftover wool was used to make pom-poms. Two reasons: there wasn’t much else in terms of decoration for one’s attire.

And also coz making pom-poms is cake. So easy in fact that even men can make them  Maybe

Welp, that’s it for theory. Tune in next week for prac. where I’ll teach y’all how to make one. 😁

* For those who doubt this is possible, look up the lyrics to the chorus of a song called ‘Undone’ (aka ‘The Sweater Song’) by Weezer. 🤭

[old dee 22,847]

26 minutes ago, Skuit said:

Just jumped through some hoops to shut down my Kayo account, because I'm currently overseas. It inspired me to close my Amazon and Uber Pass accounts as well, and then remembered that I also had some sub-accounts through Amazon - none of which I have used for over six months. All in, I think I have thrown over $500 against the wall, because I'm socio-economically stupid and lazy. It's the old gym membership play. I think there should be some law against it. 

My father used to say you cannot legislate against stupidly Skuit. 

[picket fence 15,100]

On 5/15/2022 at 9:30 PM, CYB said:

I don’t think Salem is anywhere ready. Didn’t he just start running last week? Still think he is 2 weeks away. 

If Dunstan is out then it might be a shuffling of deck chairs to bring a defender or Forward in. My guess :

In : Weid to CHF, Tmac to wing , JJ to mid / HF

Bedford for Chandler as medi sub. 

 

Weideman has had his chances and failed to capitalise. If a wildcard chance was to come into play, I would rather get a game into Van Rooyen. Having said that if Dunstan is fit he plays if not Laurie might be a chance or Bedford as well

Edited May 19, 2022 by picket fence

[DemonWA 3,432]

20 hours ago, old dee said:

Only solution is buy a subscription and to hell with 7/ AFL. Of course that is probably what they want anyway. 

I haven't seen you this negative on an issue since Jamie Bennell was running around in our kit

[Borgzilla 52]

Milkshake in.

Thought it would be Bedford

Edited May 19, 2022 by Borgzilla
Submitted to early