Jump to content

  • Podcast:      

  • Podcast:      

The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule



Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Isn't part of the angst the fact that many umpires have no feel for the game probably coz many have not ever played themselves. This could be a reason why the second guess element of decision making leads to errors.Similarly the hands up display that has lead to fifties being paid, is frivolous, unwarranted and displays limited empathy for the players for exactly the same reason

I thought Pettys spoil almost perfect and could, but wasn't to have been, play on.

Yes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

I also feel as premiers, the MFC are being made examples of.

It is easy - just don't do it.

I think it is a great rule. It speeds up the game and almost eliminates "show-boating" leaving the game's famous posers with no-where to go except 50m down field away from their goals or looking at the apposition goal while they take the subsequent free kick.

It also takes pressure off the Umpires which can only be a good thing given the immense difficulty of their task and the abuse they have had to put up with over so many years. No wonder the AFL has so much difficulty in filling their ranks at all levels. That can now be expected to improve which can only be a good thing.

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I posted this in the Casey thread but is probably more suited to this one. Sorry if some of the context is lost. And I also agree that the abuse rule needs to remain, but refined and more consistency.

Totally agree. There is virtually no transparency on umpire reviews of performance and by that I also mean a lack of media scrutiny. I know why they stopped bagging umpires on TV, but it has gone too far in that there now seems to be no accountability. Constructive discussion with an umpires rep explaining decisions should be a weekly occurrence with a view to improving umpiring. When the same umpires keeping getting shown up (like some of Stevic's strange involvements) then a better feedback loop can begin. Need to talk more openly publicly to help ease supporter frustration as poor decisions seem to generally go ignored after the event. We should also be discussing and recognising good performances.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Dees2014 said:

It is easy - just don't do it.

I think it is a great rule. It speeds up the game and almost eliminates "show-boating" leaving the game's famous posers with no-where to go except 50m down field away from their goals or looking at the apposition goal while they take the subsequent free kick.

It also takes pressure off the Umpires which can only be a good thing given the immense difficulty of their task and the abuse they have had to put up with over so many years. No wonder the AFL has so much difficulty in filling their ranks at all levels. That can now be expected to improve which can only be a good thing.

Don't do what? That's the problem.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Players will learn. 

And then, much, much, much later, supporters finally will too.

There is a culture of umpire abuse in AFL football at all levels. It's not only accepted but often encouraged as 'passion'. Umpires are scapegoats because there will always be bad decisions in 2 hours of chaos. It needs to stop.

At lower levels of football many teams are having to sacrifice a player to umpire the game .... and those players nearly always say how much more difficult it is than they thought it would be. I suspect they also come out of it far more respectful of umpires.

Edited by Axis of Bob
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think, as others have mentioned, it should just be a stringent return to the ‘abuse’ ruling. Players putting their hands out in confusion feels like an overreaction - but any player uttering anything to the umpire is an instant 50.

It often feels like things go too far before they settle at a place that the AFL community learns to live with. I think we are in that stage, but it’ll calm down.

  • Like 1
  • Thinking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Webber said:

De-rail slightly…… what do we think about Harry Petty’s spoil on Jesse Hogan that gifted his only goal on Saturday night? Was a perfect spoil in an impossible situation for me…running back, punched the ball and didn’t touch the player. Umpire knee-jerked to the fact he was running face onto Hogan to spoil, assumed it was ‘front-on contact’ because he didn’t mark it. I was a teeny bit ropable. 

I was at the ground and haven't seen the TV replay, but at the time I thought the spoil was perfect. Watching the replay on the scoreboard I thought Petty's arm might have given Hogan an ear massage, although it was not possible to be sure. If a review system similar to cricket was in place, I think it would have been "umpire's call".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Demon player:  "Hey umpire, can I say that was a shizenhousen decision?"

Umpire:  "No, it'll be a 50 metre penalty if you say that".

Demon player:  "Am I allowed to think it was a shizenhousen decision?"

Umpire:  "You can think whatever you like".

Demon player:  "I think that was a shizenhousen decision".

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dees2014 said:

It is easy - just don't do it.

I think it is a great rule. It speeds up the game and almost eliminates "show-boating" leaving the game's famous posers with no-where to go except 50m down field away from their goals or looking at the apposition goal while they take the subsequent free kick.

It also takes pressure off the Umpires which can only be a good thing given the immense difficulty of their task and the abuse they have had to put up with over so many years. No wonder the AFL has so much difficulty in filling their ranks at all levels. That can now be expected to improve which can only be a good thing.

If a 50 costs us a Grand Final on an umpires interpretation of body language would it still be a good thing?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, picket fence said:

If a 50 costs us a Grand Final on an umpires interpretation of body language would it still be a good thing?

This old chestnut gets dragged out about every single rule change.

Has a Grand Final ever been decided by a 50 meter penalty?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just cannot see how raising your arms or looking upwards to the sky to indicate your disagreement with a decision is abusive or  is necessarily even disrespectful.  Or why any umpire with an ounce of self-confidence would feel hard-done by a player exhibiting disagreement.   Disagreement doesn't mean the other person thinks you are an [censored], just mistaken. 

For  example, the free paid against Petty for that excellent spoil. I could see that the umpire may have been mislead into thinking Petty hit the GWS player's head (as did many posters here) when in fact it was the footy that hit his head.  If I (or had Petty) indicated disagreement it does not mean we think the umpire was an [censored]. Just wrong.  Which is easy to be given the speed or the game, the vague rules and the fact that umpires are not equipped with 360 degree slo-mo vision. 

If the current umpires are such precious petals that disagreement is too much for them, I expect properly paid full-time employment may help them get over it.   (Abuse is another matter.) I think umpiring issues at junior levels can be addressed by other means than requiring AFL players to behave like robots.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Axis of Bob said:

Players will learn. 

And then, much, much, much later, supporters finally will too.

There is a culture of umpire abuse in AFL football at all levels. It's not only accepted but often encouraged as 'passion'. Umpires are scapegoats because there will always be bad decisions in 2 hours of chaos. It needs to stop.

At lower levels of football many teams are having to sacrifice a player to umpire the game .... and those players nearly always say how much more difficult it is than they thought it would be. I suspect they also come out of it far more respectful of umpires.

Agree with the thrust of your post, but disagree with the way they have brought this in.

Any abuse to an umpire should be penalized and I am sure we all agree on that.

I just don't think that every bit of frustration, or even guarding the mark with hands out is abuse.

They have even given a 50 for a player shaking his head. That could be at himself.

I don't agree that putting the arms out is a 50, otherwise you can't even STAND and guard the mark. It is an overreaction.

This is being badly adjudicated and is another reason to criticize umpires. The umpires don't need this and it is unhelpful to the cause.

Just make it any DEMONSTRATIVE gesture or verbal abuse aimed to the umpire.

This is a perception rule and made so the crowds see no abuse of umpires.

At the moment it is a farcical rule, bringing the umpires under more attention. They don't need it and neither does the game.

PS: Imagine losing a GF, because a player is waving his arms at the player having a free kick or mark, to try and put him off his kick and a 50 is paid for abuse, giving his team the winning goal. That would not be helpful to umpires.

 

Edited by Redleg
  • Like 5
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dees2014 said:

It is easy - just don't do it.

I think it is a great rule. It speeds up the game and almost eliminates "show-boating" leaving the game's famous posers with no-where to go except 50m down field away from their goals or looking at the apposition goal while they take the subsequent free kick.

It also takes pressure off the Umpires which can only be a good thing given the immense difficulty of their task and the abuse they have had to put up with over so many years. No wonder the AFL has so much difficulty in filling their ranks at all levels. That can now be expected to improve which can only be a good thing.

"It also takes pressure off the Umpires which can only be a good thing.." 

Wrong - it only makes things worse.   Open abuse, yes: penalising arms out in exasperation only reinforces the authoritarian mindset of AFL HQ and does nothing to harbour goodwill between players and umpires.

Do umpires regularly visit all clubs at training and get to know the players and explain how they interpret the rules? NO. That IMO would be the first step in "addressing disrespect" rather than acting like infallible dictators.

14 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

This old chestnut gets dragged out about every single rule change.

Has a Grand Final ever been decided by a 50 meter penalty?

Not yet, but would you like us to be on the wrong end of the stick when it inevitably does?

Edited by monoccular
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Demon player:  "Hey umpire, can I say that was a shizenhousen decision?"

Umpire:  "No, it'll be a 50 metre penalty if you say that".

Demon player:  "Am I allowed to think it was a shizenhousen decision?"

Umpire:  "You can think whatever you like".

Demon player:  "I think that was a shizenhousen decision".

Umpire: Thats a 100 metre penalty

Demon Player: Why?

Umpire: The fact you thought it a shizenhoisen decsion and then articulated it is clear dissent thats 50 and the other is clearly disrespecting my authority by asking the question. Thats another 50. Anything else?

Demon player: Hnmm my ex partner had similar views to these, I cant win can I?

Umpire: Nope.

Edited by picket fence
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hellaintabadplacetobe said:

Saw a Blues player raise his arms in protest against a decision in the dying minutes against Port. 

Nothing to see here according to that umpire, right in front of him.

Hence the confusion and angst.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

So it's never happened before but is now 'inevitable'....

yes

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Demon player:  "Hey umpire, can I say that was a shizenhousen decision?"

Umpire:  "No, it'll be a 50 metre penalty if you say that".

Demon player:  "Am I allowed to think it was a shizenhousen decision?"

Umpire:  "You can think whatever you like".

Demon player:  "I think that was a shizenhousen decision".

Best post of Easter….close the thread. (still laughing) 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with this rule isn’t that we don’t agree that umpires need to be respected, it’s that it is impossible to adjudicate CONSISTENTLY because what one umpire constitutes as “abuse” another umpire won’t. Already we’ve seen countless examples of this across the first 5 rounds. 
It is too much of a grey area and therefore needs to be changed to: verbal abuse or physical intimidation = 50m. Everything else is fair game. 

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Axis of Bob said:

Players will learn. 

And then, much, much, much later, supporters finally will too.

There is a culture of umpire abuse in AFL football at all levels. It's not only accepted but often encouraged as 'passion'. Umpires are scapegoats because there will always be bad decisions in 2 hours of chaos. It needs to stop.

At lower levels of football many teams are having to sacrifice a player to umpire the game .... and those players nearly always say how much more difficult it is than they thought it would be. I suspect they also come out of it far more respectful of umpires.

The main topic here is the arms out in frustration not umpire abuse. You should allowed to express frustration non verbally in the 1-2 seconds after a decision. 

the verbal abuse rule, I think everyone would agree is good. Umps should not have cop this

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Protecting umpires from demonstrative and evident abuse or remonstrations is OK.

However acts of frustration, disappointment, dismay, annoyance and similar sentiments by a player are not abuse and should not be penalised. Maxie's standard eye roll for unknown infractions are surely acceptable as is extending arms to stand on the mark.

The status of umpires at this level should not be affected by occasional expressions of regret by players and the AFL should rapidly clarify what should be acceptable conduct. Otherwise the football world will slowly lose respect for umpires.

These comments are directed only at the most senior levels of footy. At all other levels below AFL and perhaps VFL there should be zero tolerance for any response accompanied by a 25 m penalty and broader club penalties for repeat offenders. The place to eliminate poor behavior against umpires is at the level where the game is played.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

The problem with this rule isn’t that we don’t agree that umpires need to be respected, it’s that it is impossible to adjudicate CONSISTENTLY because what one umpire constitutes as “abuse” another umpire won’t. Already we’ve seen countless examples of this across the first 5 rounds. 
It is too much of a grey area and therefore needs to be changed to: verbal abuse or physical intimidation = 50m. Everything else is fair game. 

Just goes to show they didn't think it through and maybe hoped one scorched earth community series game would be enough to send the message to the entire comp.

But hey presto, players react in different ways to giving away a free. The umps department clearly hadn't gone over past footage to determine what's acceptable and what's not. They're undermining themselves.

If they're trying to set an example for lower grades of footy, surely some degree of frustration or disappointment is allowed. As other have said, the player might be disappointed in himself, or worried about what his coach might say. He isn't necessarily disagreeing with the ump or disrespecting the ump.

Right concept, terrible execution. The AFL umps department in action.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tiers said:

The status of umpires at this level should not be affected by occasional expressions of regret by players and the AFL should rapidly clarify what should be acceptable conduct.

They manifestly don't know what is!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Whispering_Jack changed the title to The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    NIGHTMARES OF NARRM by Whispering Jack

    Narrm Time has arrived in our city as the Melbourne Football Club takes the name Narrm Football Club as part of the 2022 AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round. This week will see the reigning premier pay respect to the region the club calls home — the land of the Wurundjeri people and their culture, language and memory. The team will wear its indigenous guernsey designed by Wurundjeri/Dja Dja Wurrung artist Ky-ya Nicholson Ward and what better way to wear it than with a win over North Melbourne Football C

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    WESTERN SUNSET by George on the Outer

    It was the top of the table Demons who inflicted their highest ever defeat of the Eagles, thereby ensuring that the sun has finally set on their long dynasty out West.  The final margin was 74 points but it was the final quarter barrage of seven goals which definitively signalled to the meagre West Coast opposition and supporters exactly who was in control.  That was after a similar six goal to one opening quarter, but hey … why not boo and complain about every decision that went aga

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    ON THE RAMPAGE by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons had it easy on a windy day under sunny skies at the home of the VFL Kangaroos at Arden Street on Sunday. They caught the hapless Roos who were badly depleted by injury on the hop and disposed of them with little trouble. It was the second time in consecutive seasons that Casey inflicted a 100 plus points defeat on the Roos who had no answers for an opponent on the rampage. When the game started, Casey was without three important forward line components in Mitch Brown, Ka

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    RISING TO PHOENIX by William from West Perth

    On Sunday, when the Melbourne Football Club returns to the scene of the club’s most famous victory of the 21st Century, the feeling out there on the ground will most certainly be different. The dying moments of the night of 25 September, 2021 at Optus Stadium marked a team rising to the level of a Phoenix, bathing in the cheers and adulation from an adoring crowd in the wake of their premiership victory after so many years of hardship and desolation. This time around they can expect a main

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    TO THE SWORD by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons closed off their game against the Southport Sharks with a comfortable 30-point win off the back of a monster six goal opening term in which they put the Southport Sharks to the sword and kept them scoreless.  Despite losing Toby Bedford to AFL medical sub duty, Majak Daw and Bailey Laurie, the Demons still fielded a strong list of 13 MFC players and also managed to blood two more local newcomers in Tyler Edwards and Tom Macrae after adding four debutants last week. The Shar

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    NO HEAVEN FOR SAINTS by George on the Outer

    Just when St.Kilda thought it was heading toward Saintly Heaven in Season 2022, it was brought crashing to earth quickly by the ruthless Demons machine. It wasn’t a long drawn out process before the Saints discovered how fragile they were. The Demons simply took the game apart in the first quarter piling on four goals against a paltry three  behinds. Even when Membrey was going to score a major right on the ¼ time bell from 15m out in front, he failed to bypass the outstretched hands of Har

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    COVID PROOF FENCE by Whispering Jack

    Melbourne fans breathed a sigh of relief last Saturday when their team managed to beat Hawthorn and the Covid19 outbreak that left it without coach Simon Goodwin and five premiership players – Luke Jackson, Kysaiah Pickett, Tom Sparrow, Harrison Petty and Alex Neal-Bullen. The 10-point win was meritorious not just because the Demons overcame the loss of the coach and key players but also due to the way in which they survived the tension surrounding the club in the 72 hours leading up to the

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    YIPS by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons overcame a bout of goal kicking yips and a last quarter Box Hill Hawks comeback to record a thrilling 7 point away from home victory on Sunday. With senior affiliate Melbourne fighting a Covid breakout and some injury concerns to their listed players, Casey turned to youth and called up locals Zac Andrewartha, Matthew Johnson and Harvey Neocleous to join Matt Buntine, a local product who was part of the inaugural GWS Giants list.  The team made a slow start but took co

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    DEPLETED NOT DEFEATED by George on the Outer

    With Covid 19 ravaging the club, forcing the absence of five players from last week and some more premiership players still sidelined or returning after isolating, it was certainly a depleted Melbourne side that turned up to front Hawthorn in their Round 7 match up at the MCG. Normally, when a team loses ¼ of its soldiers, you would expect a less than favourable result but after the Hawks opened up a 2 goal lead in the opening minutes (and indeed, it could have been more) the Demon machine

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    NO COMEBACKS by The Oracle

    Q:  How do the Hawks come back after being 32-0 early, leading at every interval and then conceding nine goals in the last quarter to lose to the Swans by 41 points in the comfort and safety of their second home down in Launceston? A:  If they’re playing the Demons at the G off a five-day break, there are no comebacks. They simply won’t come back! That’s the short form preview of the Melbourne v Hawthorn match up at the Home of Football this weekend. That is not to dismiss the you

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 1

    TIGERS OUTPOINTED by George On The Outer

    Normally when one side outpoints the other, it is because of an emphatic victory.  Against Richmond in the annual ANZAC Eve Blockbuster, the win by Melbourne was anything but emphatic, as they managed to miss the “big sticks” an incredible 22 times!   The groans from around the ground as the Demons failed to put the Tigers away, eventually turned into ironic cheers for each successive point on the scoreboard. However, this irony from the fans was only possible because Melbourne had compl

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    MOMENTS OF DOUBT by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons maintained their undefeated run and top spot on the VFL ladder after a bruising game against Richmond VFL at Punt Road yesterday but it wasn’t without its moments of doubt. The team was greeted by clear windless weather and sunny skies at Tigerland, a far cry from the prevailing conditions at their fortress in outer suburban Melbourne at Casey Fields. Things looked very bright in the  early part of the game when Jimmy Munro got things under way with the opening goal from a

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...