Jump to content

  • Podcast:  

  • Podcast: 2022 Season Review & Trade Wrap 

Club considered standing down Goodwin during season?



Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Grand New Flag said:

I know Bartlett well professionally and at a friendship level.  I would be shocked if he had anything to do with this leaking.  Its simply not his style.  He did after all resign from the Presidency honourably.  He has never spoken a negative word to the anyone let alone the press.

I hope you are right GNF, and you probably are.

Which is why i reckon it is probably in his Bartlett's bets interests to clear this up. I mean that's not really fair, but that's life. Bottom line most people are assuming it is him and not refuting those suggestions reinforces those beliefs. 

A couple of points - and not wanting to bag Bartlett, someone i think who did a terrific job at the club - saying he resigned the Presidency honorably is true, but there is little doubt he was pushed.

It was the very definition of a bloodless coup and kudos to him for not making noise ensuring that was the case. 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A constant theme in this tread seems to be shoot the messenger.

The reported things happened they are not made up by the news media.

Deal with them but please cease this abuse of the messengers if they did not happen there would not be a story in the media.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 minute ago, Grand New Flag said:

My suspicion is the outsiders who are wanting a place on the Board.  One of them in particular is very close to the club, for years has put himself forward as a Board member only to be rejected by the board. He is now standing as an outsider.

While I agree that it probably isn't Bartlett, how would this certain outsider get access to all this inside information including emails and meetings where only a few people were present? There would still have to be someone internally leaking those things.

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lord Nev said:

While I agree that it probably isn't Bartlett, how would this certain outsider get access to all this inside information including emails and meetings where only a few people were present? There would still have to be someone internally leaking those things.

 

Such is the human condition LN. To expect otherwise is folly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 1964_2 said:

BS.

the doctor was incompetent, and probably should have been sacked earlier.

what goody said, would be said at least once a week at most other clubs. 

Nev, you sound like a closet Richmond supporter trying to undermine us.

Please stop defaming the great Nev’s name, with your negative comments and face palms

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Facepalm 1
  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

While I agree that it probably isn't Bartlett, how would this certain outsider get access to all this inside information including emails and meetings where only a few people were present? There would still have to be someone internally leaking those things.

 

 

I suspect he has some supporters in the club, maybe the x doctor, maybe someone else who left disgruntled. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Grand New Flag said:

 

My suspicion is the outsiders who are wanting a place on the Board.  One of them in particular is very close to the club, for years has put himself forward as a Board member only to be rejected by the board. He is now standing as an outsider.

 

There is no way an “outsider” would have access to all the information (text messages & emails) that Warner has quoted. 
this has been fed by an insider, someone who was part of the Conversation. 
That same person has a serious axe to grind, now they may be feeding a 3rd person 

But i can only see the Source as 1 person 

 

Edited by Sir Why You Little
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites


58 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

It is fair to surmise that other members of the Melbourne board were not impressed that their president had acted without their full approval (albeit with one other director at the meeting)."

The other director is still on the board, should it be a concern? should he move on? will he have the trust of the other board members?

Edited by rjay
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

There is no way an “outsider” would have access to all the information (text messages & emails) that Warner has quoted. 
this has been fed by an insider, someone who was part of the Conversation. 
That same person has a serious axe to grind, now they may be feeding a 3rd person 

But i can only see the Source as 1 person 

 

The Doctor was disgruntle and from what I can see in on all the leaked emails regarding concussions and drug testing.  He did after all sue the MFC for false dismissal.  Warner and/or the Doctor.

Edited by Grand New Flag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Fork 'em said:

What a load of sensationalist sheet.

Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep.

At first glance i read this as: 

Wolves don't lose sleep over the onions of sheep.

Which sounded kind of cool. Like some badly translated old Russian proverb

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The story is obviously not nothing. Things happened and by all current accounts were dealt with accordingly. Not going to attack any journos for doing their job but when I first read the article there was a lot not adding up. Club doctors and leaked board emails and minutes and then not being able to tell if this was a bullying, gambling problem or Mental health story. There's simply more to it and we need to hear from a few more people including the league CEO. 

So for me and most of us it seems the real story is the board leaks and the upcoming election. Not condoning any of the alleged behaviour and speculation but this the main crux of the story.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Grand New Flag said:

 

My suspicion is the outsiders who are wanting a place on the Board.  One of them in particular is very close to the club, for years has put himself forward as a Board member only to be rejected by the board. He is now standing as an outsider.

 

With all due respect GNF, i'm not sure casting aspersions is fair or helpful - and there is an inherent contradiction in  doing so in the context of, quite reasonably, pushing back against unfounded aspersions against Bartlett 

Edited by binman
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, binman said:

At first glance i read this as: 

Wolves don't lose sleep over the onions of sheep.

Which sounded kind of cool. Like some badly translated old Russian proverb

Sorry binman but cannot help myself. I did not know sheep had onions.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Skuit said:

There has only been one accusation of wrong-doing levelled at Goodwin; workplace bullying - and we know that the standards in an elite sporting environment aren't exactly equivalent to those in an ordinary workplace. 

Arain ultimately received a minimal pay-out, less than a year's severance and well under half of what he was seeking. Goodwin has denied the accusations of bullying and has been backed by the board following a review. 

Other allegations had been privately made by Pert about Arain's behaviour at the time, and the bullying claims don't fit with any other public statements made about Goodwin's character and interpersonal relations in recent times. 

It's very possible though that he could have used what might be construed to be aggressive language. Judging by recent appointments, it's evident that the footy department had issues with our fitness and injury management. 

I have no idea who was responsible for the following, but Viney's foot was apparently mismanaged, Steve Smith was kicking up a serious stink about Joel, and half our list heading for off-season surgery at once set our club back by more than a year. 

Who knows if the former was necessary, or could have been staggered - but it put intense pressure on Goodwin and the club. If I recall correctly, Smith's public anger was also tied to the swelling threat of a board challenge reported by Caro. 

On the balance of things, I don't think there's enough evidence to suggest that Goodwin has ever acted in a way that the average person would consider inappropriate in the context of a footballing workplace environment. 

 

 

 

The recently departed Fitness Guru mentioned that when he started with us in 2019, he inherited a list of crocks. Look at them now...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Grand New Flag said:

The Doctor was disgruntle and from what I can see in on all the emails regarding concussions and drug testing.  He did after all sue the MFC for false dismissal.  Warner and/or the Doctor.

The Doctor was paid out. If he leaked after that he would be in serious trouble 

IF the Club and Doctor were still in dispute, then it may be different 

But the Doctor has been compensated. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rjay said:

The other director is still on the board, should it be a concern? should he move on? will he have the trust of the other board members?

Sure would be interesting being a fly on the wall today...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, old dee said:

A constant theme in this tread seems to be shoot the messenger.

The reported things happened they are not made up by the news media.

Deal with them but please cease this abuse of the messengers if they did not happen there would not be a story in the media.

 

Sorry, old dee. I'm not quite following you. Are you saying that everything that's communicated privately within an organisation, between organisations, and between individuals should be leaked to the media with no repercussions if there's a story in it? The reason why there's a constant theme is because this should not have been leaked, regardless of whether it happened or not. I would assume you like me have done 1 or 2 things in your life that you're not overly proud of. Are you happy for that infornation to be provided to the Herald Sun?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The former president became involved with the MFC because he wanted to bring business to his old law firm (Clayton Utz)where he was a partner and parochial eagles fan. His words in the meeting he raised his intention to become involved with MFC attending the corporate lunches, "rich managerial people barrack for Melbourne, it's a good networking opportunity" certainly nothing wrong with that and something I'm sure many people do.

However, as a Melbourne supporter I always had reservations when he actually became the president because of the original motive, but again I also understand once inside a club, you do naturally care as it is your reputation etc.. on the line and you become involved with the people and become invested, so I never questioned his desire while in the job, even if I questioned his initial motives.

However, the risk is that if you actually barracked for the someone else all your life before you transition, once you leave,  the transition is likely to lead you back to what you cared for before and not feel as much a part of the success (its almost they succeeded without you) This may lead to you telling the stories, issues experienced to those around you that cast the place in bad light to protect your reputation, as the club failed while you are in charge  and succeeded as soon as you stepped aside.

It would be like me coaching Old Melburnians, I would care about them while I'm there coaching obviously and put my full blood sweat and tears in, but after I move on, my main allegiance would always go back to the VAFA club I played for and cared about for many many years, even if I kept a soft spot for the club I coached. If they had immediate success after leaving and I got quizzed why I didn't get the same success, I'd become defensive and probably tell some stories of the crap I may have had to deal with.

I'm not saying GB has leaked the information personally to the media, I actually doubt that, as he would have little to gain and certainly doesn't put him in great light either, but I do think its likely a former associate of his (possibly another ex-board member or closely aligned ex-staffer) is the likely rat in the house who may be handballing information that had been passed on in good faith by GB when outlining his trials and tribulations in the role?

  • Like 6
  • Thinking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

The Doctor was paid out. If he leaked after that he would be in serious trouble 

IF the Club and Doctor were still in dispute, then it may be different 

But the Doctor has been compensated. 

 

Doctor in collaboration with Warner makes sense.  Doctor disgruntle, Warner disgruntle and wants to bring down Board.  Doctor gives emails to Warner who leaks them.  This way Doctor keeps his pay-out if busted as he is not the leaker to the press. Warner discredits Board during an election in which he is standing as on outsider.

Edited by Grand New Flag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Kate Roffey's strident defence of Goody was more than welcome.  However, the only question that remains for me is, why was the Doctor paid out a 6 figure $ sum, which clearly is not insubstantial and why was there an apparent non-disclosure clause in the settlement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Grand New Flag said:

 

Doctor in collaboration with Warner makes sense.  Doctor disgruntle, Warner disgruntle and wants to bring down Board.  Doctor gives emails to Warner who leaks them.  This way Doctor keeps his pay-out if busted as he is not the leaker to the press.

Some of the leaked emails from Pert were about the doctor.  I don't believe he was a recipient of those emails.

Gut feel is that it's neither the doctor or Bartlett.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Grand New Flag said:

 

Doctor in collaboration with Warner makes sense.  Doctor disgruntle, Warner disgruntle and wants to bring down Board.  Doctor gives emails to Warner who leaks them.  This way Doctor keeps his pay-out if busted as he is not the leaker to the press.

Why is Warner disgruntled? He is a Journalist, it is his job to sniff out stories, not bring down the MFC Board

Doctor gives emails to Warner, who then writes a story. 
if that is the case The Doctor is a fool and i hope the Club take him to the Cleaners 

Can’t see it myself. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Why is Warner disgruntled? He is a Journalist, it is his job to sniff out stories, not bring down the MFC Board

Doctor gives emails to Warner, who then writes a story. 
if that is the case The Doctor is a fool and i hope the Club take him to the Cleaners 

Can’t see it myself. 

That was a bizarre take by GNF re Warner being disgruntled. 

As you said, his sole job in all of this is to write the story itself. 

Warner has no personal attachment to this story. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some on here are saying it wouldn’t be the ex-president who’s responsible for the leaks because he doesn’t stand to gain anything from doing it. And that may be so… in a physical sense. Or a financial sense, or any number of senses. But he is human, and sometimes people do uncharacteristic or seemingly pointless things purely out of spite or vindictiveness. I don’t know the man but this isn’t beyond the realm of possibility. Well, no more or no less than any other human being. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    GRAND NEW FLAG by Meggs

    Daisy was at pains to tell everyone who asked that the grand final story was NOT the Daisy Pearce story.  She wanted people to focus on the Melbourne Football Club, our wonderful players and non-playing teammates, her legacy buddy head coach Mick Stinear, the assistant coaches, the Club volunteers, the Board, the administrators, #DeeArmy, all supporters, in fact anyone who bleeds for the red and the blue.  But it is also a bit about the pioneer, role model, mother who is Daisy Pearce

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    EYES ON THE PRIZE by Meggs

    The Stinear/Pearce partnership has evolved over the 7 AFLW seasons and they have built a team with talented, committed footballers who play for each other and execute a highly entertaining brand of footy. On Sunday can a premiership be added to this legacy? This may well be the last time we see Daisy in the mighty red and blue as she contemplates her start date for a coaching role ‘Down at Kardinia Park’.  Last week’s sensational sealer in the Prelim showed everybody that Daisy could s

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    DAISY’S DEMON DRIVE by Meggs

    On a blustery Saturday afternoon when the conditions affected marking skills and the ball bounced unpredictably, the Mighty Dees stuck fat against a determined Kangaroos outfit to break away with two final quarter goals to none to win AFLW Preliminary Final 2 by 17 points — an all-time high winning margin between these two teams.  From the outset it was a fiercely fought contest with Melbourne unable to find the ball in space. North really amped up their one-percenters an

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    NOT A MOMENT TO MISS by Meggs

    The AFLW Season 7 fixture was carefully crafted to purposely handicap the better teams and give the expansion and developing sides an easier draw.  Nonetheless, this weekend’s Preliminary Finals will showcase the Lions, Demons, Crows and Roos, teams widely accepted as the best 4 in the competition.   In Friday night’s Prelim 1 the minor premiers, Brisbane, will start warm favourites at home against Adelaide.   On Saturday afternoon at Ikon Park, Prelim 2 between Melbourne and North is

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    STICK TO YOUR GUNS by Meggs

    The Dees convincingly overcome the fast-starting reigning-premiers Adelaide to win by 21 points in a fiery Qualifying Final match at Ikon Park on Friday evening.     In that first quarter Adelaide jumped out of the blocks kicking their first goal inside 20 seconds finishing with 3 goals to nil. All was quiet at Ikon Park.     Melbourne, having easily outplayed lesser opponents over the past six weeks took time to ratchet up their intensity.  But, by mid to late first quarter, the Dees be

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    HEAVYWEIGHTS by Meggs

    AFLW heavyweights Melbourne and Adelaide kick off the AFLW Season 7 Final Series with a massive Qualifying Final clash at Ikon Park this Friday night at 7:10pm.  The game promises to be a cracker.   Last season’s Grand Final combatants last met in Round 1where Melbourne came away with a strong 18-point victory at Glenelg Oval. The Dees will be hoping to replicate the result and move directly to the Preliminary Final.    While Adelaide may not have been as intimidating this season as in p

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    MISSED IT BY THAT MUCH by Meggs

    Congratulations to Daisy’s Dees on a huge 78-point one-sided win against West Coast in challenging windy and wet conditions at Casey Fields.     The banner celebrating Sarah Lampard’s 50 games was a victim of the wind, but nonetheless Lampy received a warm round of applause from the parochial crowd in attendance.   Melbourne has the double-chance and is excited about its chances in the Season 7 AFLW finals. If this means the Grand Final is played at Metricon and the Demond make it, then

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    LIVE IN THE MOMENT by Meggs

    The final home and away match of Season 7, sees the mighty Dees at Fortress Casey hosting the 16th placed West Coast.     A win assures the Dees of a Top-2 finish, with the ultimate placings dependent upon the previous night’s result between Brisbane and Collingwood and the relative percentages.   As our match is anticipated to be one-sided, interest may turn to monitoring the live ladder to see whether or not Melbourne has secured the minor premiership.     The Demons (Lions and Cro

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    BOMBED by Whispering Jack

    Melbourne has all but assured itself of a top two finish to the (second) 2022 AFLW season after crushing Essendon by 41 points on Sunday. It now holds a four point lead over third placed Adelaide along with a handy percentage advantage with one round remaining before the finals. The Demons opened kicking with the advantage of the squally wind that often prevails at Casey Fields and for the third week in a row, they kept their opponents scoreless in the opening term. Speedster Alyssa Ba

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...