Need for another ruckman?

[DistrACTION Jackson 6,395]

As was the case last year, I'm a little concerned if we go into next season with just Gawn, Preuss & Bradtke. 

I would like to see us use a rookie pick on an experienced ruck to keep on the list just in case, but also provide cover in the VFL as well. This would be mainl as protecton for Bradtke who is still very much a developing player.

Thoughts on who may be available?

[DeeSpencer 23,061]

For some reason we like to keep a glut of useless flankers on the list rather than cut the cord and use list spots on developing players. That said, it is what it is for this year so I wouldn't bother using one of the precious list spots we have left on a back up to the back up.

The big fella who played at Casey last year, Wale-Buxton? He looked more than adequate as a VFL ruck. And we've got the preseason and mid season rookie periods to add a state league option if needed.

 

[—coach— 3,466]

Last 3 years:

Melb 69 Games for 33wins and 36 losses = 47.8% wins

With Gawn playing 59 games for 27wins and 32 losses = 45.7% wins

Without Gawn 10 games for 6 wins and 4 losses = 60% wins

Given we have an excellent backup option already, plus a backup to the backup. And given our win loss ratio is better when gawn doesn’t play. Not sure a backup to the backup to the backup is required.

[Demon Dynasty 15,210]

2 minutes ago, —coach— said:

Last 3 years:

Melb 69 Games for 33wins and 36 losses = 47.8% wins

With Gawn playing 59 games for 27wins and 32 losses = 45.7% wins

Without Gawn 10 games for 6 wins and 4 losses = 60% wins

Given we have an excellent backup option already, plus a backup to the backup. And given our win loss ratio is better when gawn doesn’t play. Not sure a backup to the backup to the backup is required.

Nice work Coach and agree.  Investment in small forward/s and a KF is a much higher priority for us at this stage.

[Scipio 5,868]

50 minutes ago, —coach— said:

Last 3 years:

Melb 69 Games for 33wins and 36 losses = 47.8% wins

With Gawn playing 59 games for 27wins and 32 losses = 45.7% wins

Without Gawn 10 games for 6 wins and 4 losses = 60% wins

Given we have an excellent backup option already, plus a backup to the backup. And given our win loss ratio is better when gawn doesn’t play. Not sure a backup to the backup to the backup is required.

Very small sample size to use as a reliable indicator. It'd be interesting to see who the opposition was in the games where Gawn was missing. But I don't think we're useless without him at all either.

[DistrACTION Jackson 6,395]

1 hour ago, —coach— said:

Last 3 years:

Melb 69 Games for 33wins and 36 losses = 47.8% wins

With Gawn playing 59 games for 27wins and 32 losses = 45.7% wins

Without Gawn 10 games for 6 wins and 4 losses = 60% wins

Given we have an excellent backup option already, plus a backup to the backup. And given our win loss ratio is better when gawn doesn’t play. Not sure a backup to the backup to the backup is required.

I'm not saying we are useless without Gawn, I'm just saying most sides have the following:

1. Premier ruck

2. Back up who can forward and ruck if needed

3. Back up ruck

4. Developing ruck who is 2-3 years away

[Nelo 813]

Not sure if you can really afford to have 4 ruckman on your list unless they can play forward which the 3 we have can’t do. 

[—coach— 3,466]

1 hour ago, Luther said:

Very small sample size to use as a reliable indicator. It'd be interesting to see who the opposition was in the games where Gawn was missing. But I don't think we're useless without him at all either.

Agree on the sample size, but I think the point is still relevant. Many would think we would be cactus without gawn but the stats don’t seem to suggest that. 

At the end of the day I don’t think we need 4 ruckman.

[Satyriconhome 9,982]

2 hours ago, Nelo said:

Not sure if you can really afford to have 4 ruckman on your list unless they can play forward which the 3 we have can’t do. 

Bradtke when he played at Casey, was mostly used as a forward so WRONG as per the norm, but amusing, as per the norm

Sam Jacobs and Ben McEvoy say hello

[Wiseblood 24,636]

3 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

Bradtke when he played at Casey, was mostly used as a forward so WRONG as per the norm, but amusing, as per the norm

Sam Jacobs and Ben McEvoy say hello

Just because he plays forward doesn't mean he CAN play forward.  We weren't exactly flush with tall forwards for large parts of the season.

Clarkson has also said (or maybe it was Graeme Wright, can't remember which) that McEvoy will play a bit down back next season, so Nelo has something of a point.

[Nelo 813]

12 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

Just because he plays forward doesn't mean he CAN play forward.  We weren't exactly flush with tall forwards for large parts of the season.

Clarkson has also said (or maybe it was Graeme Wright, can't remember which) that McEvoy will play a bit down back next season, so Nelo has something of a point.

Exactly. Anyone can play forward but doesn’t mean they’re any good. So as per the norm stay is wrong. 

[Supermercado 2,609]

Didn't hurt us too badly when McDonald did it in mid-2017. Not against parking a mature player on the rookie list but if Gawn/Preuss both go down we can get away with it.

[Satyriconhome 9,982]

42 minutes ago, Nelo said:

Exactly. Anyone can play forward but doesn’t mean they’re any good. So as per the norm stay is wrong. 

'Stay' here, Bradtke took some good contested marks and kicked a couple of goals, so he is getting the hang of it, Preuss knows he needs to improve his forward craft, Gawn regularly kicks a goal or two

Just hanging [censored] on players for the sake of it, need that in your life?

Any comment on McEvoy or Jacobs' forward craft, you can throw Zac Smith in there as well,  why he has been moved on

Bellchambers is another, shall I continue?

[demoniac 1,243]

We do seem to play it pretty vanilla with rookie list.

[JakovichScissorKick 771]

No need for another ruckman as Austin Bradtke is now the size of three normal sized ruckmen combined

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2Oe2bwpRvM

Edited October 19, 2019 by JakovichScissorKick

[Murph1524 52]

1 hour ago, JakovichScissorKick said:

No need for another ruckman as Austin Bradtke is now the size of three normal sized ruckmen combined

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2Oe2bwpRvM

Now we know what happened to Stretch and JKH

[Neil Crompton 4,676]

At some point, do we get the opportunity of signing up someone like Liam Buxton- Wales? He is big, has a great tank already, athletic, a good kick and has a very good pair of hands. Would like to hear from others who have seen more of him what their thoughts are. While he has been rucking at Casey, at 195 and over 100 Kgs, I could see him potentially taking on a mobile key position forward / 3rd tall (similar type to Tom Mac), with occasional spells in the ruck.

[old55 21,216]

Definite NO. Casey needs one on their list, even though it probably means they play top heavy with Preuss, their ruck and Bradtke all in the team together.

[chook fowler 18,174]

4 hours ago, JakovichScissorKick said:

No need for another ruckman as Austin Bradtke is now the size of three normal sized ruckmen combined

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2Oe2bwpRvM

My tip for the big mover next season - has a really good skill set, only needed some size, which he now has going by that photo. Delicious.

[FlashInThePan 1,893]

I really don't know why we would waste a list door on another developing ruckman. Gawn is AA, Preuss is very serviceable and will certainly improve with more time training with gawn.  Both Weid and Tomlinson can provide a chop out and Bradkte is developing on the wings. 

Why exactly would we want to use a draft pick or a list spot on yet another Rick development project right now? 

[DeeSpencer 23,061]

46 minutes ago, FlashInThePan said:

I really don't know why we would waste a list door on another developing ruckman. Gawn is AA, Preuss is very serviceable and will certainly improve with more time training with gawn.  Both Weid and Tomlinson can provide a chop out and Bradkte is developing on the wings. 

Why exactly would we want to use a draft pick or a list spot on yet another Rick development project right now? 

44 list spots plus Cat B. If it were up to me I'd always have plenty of young talls making their way through. If they succeed you can fill gaps cheaply or trade them away for value. A 3rd ruckman alone might be a waste of a spot but another 200cm versatile tall project would be a worthwhile investment.

The 30 best players should be able to cover most spots with some kids getting games as well, so there's about 10 spots plus cat B that should be used on developmental prospects. 

To get the next Gawn or next Stef Martin then you have to have a variety of prospects coming through.

[FlashInThePan 1,893]

45 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

44 list spots plus Cat B. If it were up to me I'd always have plenty of young talls making their way through. If they succeed you can fill gaps cheaply or trade them away for value. A 3rd ruckman alone might be a waste of a spot but another 200cm versatile tall project would be a worthwhile investment.

The 30 best players should be able to cover most spots with some kids getting games as well, so there's about 10 spots plus cat B that should be used on developmental prospects. 

To get the next Gawn or next Stef Martin then you have to have a variety of prospects coming through.

Yes, but the OP was suggesting rookieing a delisted ruck as backup. Presumably a delisted one, since that would be all that would be available and prepared to be rookied.  

That being said, I also don't think now is the time to spend draft picks on developing another ruck option although I am open to developing a versatile tall forward. Right now we need some elite kicking and some more outside run. Even a quality crumbing forward is a significantly higher priority. Using draft picks on some possible far future need seems like a really bad idea. 

[Sydee 3,612]

On 10/20/2019 at 1:21 PM, chook fowler said:

My tip for the big mover next season - has a really good skill set, only needed some size, which he now has going by that photo. Delicious.

Haven't really seen much of Bradtke but I'm hoping he can really be a big improver this season as I have little confidence in Preuss ever amounting to much 

[old dee 22,815]

On 10/20/2019 at 3:21 PM, chook fowler said:

My tip for the big mover next season - has a really good skill set, only needed some size, which he now has going by that photo. Delicious.

Pity he cant play AFL as well as his father could play basketball or his mother Tennis. From the little I have seen of him he needs a big year at Casey in 2020.

[durango 1,976]

He is 19 years old and 204cm ruckmen(ex basketballers) mature at a different rate to smaller midfielders because they have get used to the clash of bodies which does not happen in basketball as much, I would not write him off as yet.

If he shows no progess by the time he reaches 21/22 then maybe he is a good basketballer who never made it in the AFL.

His father was a very good Australian basketballer who never made it to the NBA and his mother was a very good tennis player which is not a contact sport and she never won a major title although we made it to a semi-final.