Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
The Stigga

Bartlett, Pert, et al

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, rjay said:

I'm not ok with that.

We need an external person to come in and review everything that has happened this year.

Pert is part of the club now and needs to also come under review even though he has only been here for just the year.

It has been a disappointing year, we need to look at everything.

We can't get half way through next year and realise we've made mistakes.

We need to shake out any problem areas asap and get on with it.

 

Everything must be on the table. 

This year is more than a disappointment, it has been a plummet from a great height,  from Preliminary Final day last year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, rjay said:

I'm not ok with that.

We need an external person to come in and review everything that has happened this year.

Pert is part of the club now and needs to also come under review even though he has only been here for just the year.

It has been a disappointing year, we need to look at everything.

We can't get half way through next year and realise we've made mistakes.

We need to shake out any problem areas asap and get on with it.

Blind freddy can see what is wrong:

  • Our football department structure does not have clean lines of reporting.
  • We do not have someone like a Neil Balme who has oversight of Mahoney, Goodwin and Viney to challenge them, defend them and hold them accountable.  It has all become quite cosy.  The last person in that role was Neil Craig.  At the moment that role is being performed by Pert.  It isn't his job.
  • We do not a Football Director - the last one being Greg Healy.  At the moment Bartlett is doing that role.  It isn't his job
  • There is no-one to mentor Goodwin.  No, it is not McCartney.  The last person in that role was Neil Craig.  Now there is no-one in that job.  Two weeks ago Mahoney said Goodwin has some very good external mentors.  In my book that is not enough.  We need someone internally who mentors Goodwin in all aspects of game plan, list changes, team selection etc and who has some 'skin in the game' and at the end of the day shares the accountability with him. 
  • Mahoney, Goodwin, and assistant coaches are very inexperience in the roles they have been given.  A diversity of experience and 'bad weather' sailing is required to make an effective team.
  • Assess qualifications and experience of people and the positions they hold.

That is just the off-field stuff.  I could go on but you get my drift.  Doubt an external person is going to add much more to that list. 

Posters will tear that list apart and make selective comments.  But in totality it is pretty close to the mark.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Blind freddy can see what is wrong:

  • Our football department structure does not have clean lines of reporting.
  • We do not have someone like a Neil Balme who has oversight of Mahoney, Goodwin and Viney to challenge them, defend them and hold them accountable.  It has all become quite cosy.  The last person in that role was Neil Craig.  At the moment that role is being performed by Pert.  It isn't his job.
  • We do not a Football Director - the last one being Greg Healy.  At the moment Bartlett is doing that job.  It isn't his job. 
  • There is no-one to mentor Goodwin.  No, it is not McCartney.  Two weeks ago Mahoney said Goodwin has some very good external mentors.  In my book that is not enough.  We need someone who mentors Goodwin in all aspects of game plan, list changes, team selection etc and who at the end of the day shares the accountability with him. 
  • Mahoney, Goodwin, and assistant coaches are very inexperience in the roles they have been given.  A diversity of experience and 'bad weather' sailing is required to make an effective team.

That is just the off-field stuff.  I could go on but you get my drift.  Doubt an external person is going to add much more to that list. 

Posters will tear that list apart and make selective comments.  But in totality it is pretty close to the mark.

But it has nothing to do with player skill levels and they are below VFL standards. 

Watch this clip and particularly what is highlighted. 

Club Leadership is nowhere. 

https://youtu.be/SJbgBDz-gkY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

But it has nothing to do with player skill levels and they are below VFL standards. 

Watch this clip and particularly what is highlighted. 

Club Leadership is nowhere. 

https://youtu.be/SJbgBDz-gkY

I was responding to a need for an external review and my points related to 'just the off-field stuff' and not about player skill levels.

Anyway, get the right structure and the right and experienced people in those positions and the down the line things like skills and tactics can be addressed.  Otherwise it is cart before the horse.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

I was responding to a need for an external review not about player skill levels.

Get the right structure and the right and experienced people in those positions and the down the line things like skills and tactics can be addressed.  Otherwise it is cart before the horse.

No. It’s all connected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Blind freddy can see what is wrong:

  • Our football department structure does not have clean lines of reporting.
  • We do not have someone like a Neil Balme who has oversight of Mahoney, Goodwin and Viney to challenge them, defend them and hold them accountable.  It has all become quite cosy.  The last person in that role was Neil Craig.  At the moment that role is being performed by Pert.  It isn't his job.
  • We do not a Football Director - the last one being Greg Healy.  At the moment Bartlett is doing that job.  It isn't his job. 

Not to doubt what you're saying in these points, but I'm wondering where you gathered this information? Essentially you are making the same assertion three times here in regards to governance.

As external people, we would not know anything about "clean lines of reporting". Looking at the business structure it seems pretty straight ahead in that regard.

Josh Mahoney is GM of football and Daniel McPherson is Manager of football operations. Are you saying they are not doing those jobs effectively or are you saying the club's structure is incorrect according to your information?

From what I have heard, Pert is staying well clear of being too involved in the football operations side, so where did you hear he was now a senior coach mentor type of operator? Again, not saying you're wrong, but it directly contradicts what I have heard.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Not to doubt what you're saying in these points.  Thank you.  but I'm wondering where you gathered this information? Essentially you are making the same assertion three times here in regards to governance.  imv there is a difference between 'governance'; a Board role and 'management'; operational roleComments are based on evaluating what other clubs have, what we had in the past that worked, on a club response to an email asking who reports to who and info on club website.

As external people, we would not know anything about "clean lines of reporting". Looking at the business structure it seems pretty straight ahead in that regard.  See comment above.  I worked extensively as an external consultant to government and corporates evaluating their organisation structures and reporting relationships.  Some folks may not give that much credence but that is ok.

Josh Mahoney is GM of football and Daniel McPherson is Manager of football operations. Are you saying they are not doing those jobs effectively or are you saying the club's structure is incorrect according to your information?  The club's structure is less than optimum.

From what I have heard, Pert is staying well clear of being too involved in the football operations side, so where did you hear he was now a senior coach mentor type of operator? Again, not saying you're wrong, but it directly contradicts what I have heard.  Post # 14 the thread below outlines Pert's activities re football involvement.  I don't think there is anything sinister in it.  Quite the opposite.  Perfectly natural for a new CEO to get the lay of the land.  It is also why I agree with Bartlett that we don't need a formal external review and Pert iswell placed to do it.

My responses are in your post. 

I might just reiterate that my post was responding to rjay on why I thought we don't need a formal external review. 

So I might leave this thread at that as I do not want to sidetrack the discussion to what I think.  More important to focus on what the club/Bartlett thinks.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Matsuo Basho said:

Was it the right call though? 

Malthouse would argue that his tenure was destabilised and usurped while on the cusp of back to back flags and shot down in the midst of what might’ve become an even longer premiership window than that.

Buckley has won nothing yet.

Mick may be a self-obsessed SOB but that “crackpot” has three flags in his trophy cabinet. N.Buckley has 0.

Apologies, he's a slightly more decorated, self obsessed crackpot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

My responses are in your post. 

I might just reiterate that my post was responding to rjay on why I thought we don't need a formal external review. 

So I might leave this thread at that as I do not want to sidetrack the discussion to what I think.  More important to focus on what the club/Bartlett thinks.

Thanks LH appreciate the in-depth reply.

With your experience and knowledge what would be your key recommendations as far as what our structure should be? I'm a novice in that particular area, so to me the MFC structure seems the same as most clubs.

Given some of the roles you mentioned are technically filled, should the people in those roles be replaced?

For the record, I'm in total agreeance that an external review is not needed at this stage and that the assessments already going on internally are enough for now.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Captain_Jack said:

Whether you like Pert or not, he has a record of both action and inaction.

Moved Malthouse on when it was the unpopular decision, proved to be the correct call, genuine crackpot that butchered his next coaching job. 

Stuck with Buckley when it was even less popular (partly because of the previous Malthouse decision).

Both calls while against the grain and unpopular at the time, were absolutely the right calls, let's give the bloke a little more than 5 minutes to prove his worth, or not.

keep Malthouse and they win another premiership.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, praha said:

lol do you seriously believe the reason Preuss isn't selectes, is for the sake of list management? 

Nothing would suprise me Praha, absolutely nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Blind freddy can see what is wrong:

  • Our football department structure does not have clean lines of reporting.
  • We do not have someone like a Neil Balme who has oversight of Mahoney, Goodwin and Viney to challenge them, defend them and hold them accountable.  It has all become quite cosy.  The last person in that role was Neil Craig.  At the moment that role is being performed by Pert.  It isn't his job.
  • We do not a Football Director - the last one being Greg Healy.  At the moment Bartlett is doing that role.  It isn't his job
  • There is no-one to mentor Goodwin.  No, it is not McCartney.  The last person in that role was Neil Craig.  Now there is no-one in that job.  Two weeks ago Mahoney said Goodwin has some very good external mentors.  In my book that is not enough.  We need someone internally who mentors Goodwin in all aspects of game plan, list changes, team selection etc and who has some 'skin in the game' and at the end of the day shares the accountability with him. 
  • Mahoney, Goodwin, and assistant coaches are very inexperience in the roles they have been given.  A diversity of experience and 'bad weather' sailing is required to make an effective team.
  • Assess qualifications and experience of people and the positions they hold.

That is just the off-field stuff.  I could go on but you get my drift.  Doubt an external person is going to add much more to that list. 

Posters will tear that list apart and make selective comments.  But in totality it is pretty close to the mark.

I largely agree although I've always thought the role of Footy Director is overplayed. Why can Bartlett not be President and Football Director? He's a former player, he's on the board. 

I'd like to have a Balme but a Balme can't have oversight over Mahoney. If you have a Mahoney you have a Mahoney. Do we really know Viney's role? I thought they promoted a recruiter to List Manager and moved Viney to a different broader role somewhat like Craig's.

Why aren't McCartney, Rawlings, Viney and Jennings the internal mentors that Goodwin needs? That's a lot of football experience.

I think there's room for more experience in the coaching and management set up but I think whatever shortcomings we have in that area are dwarfed by the failures of the medical/fitness department.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

But it has nothing to do with player skill levels and they are below VFL standards. 

Watch this clip and particularly what is highlighted. 

Club Leadership is nowhere. 

https://youtu.be/SJbgBDz-gkY

I don't agree with your assessment at all. These men are not alchemists. They are dealing with a fluid situation dependent on who is available, the injury toll and the state of repair of the troops who actually make the battlefield. The bottom line is Melbourne went into this season underdone and undermanned because of the 2018 finals and the larger than normal bout of postseason ops and surgeries. They also had a much tougher draw than last year and, as Jones points out, they are aware of their shortcomings and where they need to improve. Posters like you - and I don't want to be disparaging or disrespectful because it's not the purpose of my reply -  imagine that coaches, leaders, CEOS and List managers and recruiting managers and Physios and honchos like Misson are to blame for everything. I really fail to understand how showering blame on the Admin and coaching staff solves anything.

I really find it difficult to understand the mindset of posters who just denigrate, even harder to understand posters who believe Pert is somehow involved in our scheisenhaus season.

But who am I?? Indeed, what would I know, after all.....( Just ask my wife. She'll answer that rhetorical question very succinctly, as only Polish women can.)

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread should be retitled 'the outraged looking for scapegoats'

  • Like 5
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2019 at 8:14 PM, praha said:

Definitely. 

Having worked in the corporate world including the pro sport world (but not AFL) for my entire adult career, rarely do board members, execs and VPs venture down to see how the grunts are. They send their little gophers -- or "operational managers" -- to check on things. 

I've worked extensively in the service area and have never once seen the head/vp/director of a service department actually come and see the operational elements of the frontline. They have managers and team leaders for that.

That a board member even needs to go down to check out the football department is extremely worrying.

Goodwin and the entire department is on notice. Make no mistake.

I have to disagree on this one.

John Trotter hasn't missed a game in years and David Thurin is as passionate a board member as you can get. You will see them in the background of every game irrespective of the result. The usual reporting lines exist and the board gets monthly updates. These 2 are close to everything, know the players and the line coaches and get to training. They may not be officially checking out but they are engaged in the process and very hands on with the operation without getting involved or imposing themselves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Older demon said:

I have to disagree on this one.

John Trotter hasn't missed a game in years and David Thurin is as passionate a board member as you can get. You will see them in the background of every game irrespective of the result. The usual reporting lines exist and the board gets monthly updates. These 2 are close to everything, know the players and the line coaches and get to training. They may not be officially checking out but they are engaged in the process and very hands on with the operation without getting involved or imposing themselves

I still don't understand what any of this has got to do wid da bored members, da Ceos, or, for dat matter, da coaches. It's da players who keep fumbeling and kicking to the opposition and kicking bums instead of goals...

Anyway, I weally tink, it's da bloody UMPIRES!!!!!AND GILL. AND EDDIE, AND DAT COMMENTATOR BT, AND LET ME TINK......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dieter said:

I don't agree with your assessment at all. These men are not alchemists. They are dealing with a fluid situation dependent on who is available, the injury toll and the state of repair of the troops who actually make the battlefield. The bottom line is Melbourne went into this season underdone and undermanned because of the 2018 finals and the larger than normal bout of postseason ops and surgeries. They also had a much tougher draw than last year and, as Jones points out, they are aware of their shortcomings and where they need to improve. Posters like you - and I don't want to be disparaging or disrespectful because it's not the purpose of my reply -  imagine that coaches, leaders, CEOS and List managers and recruiting managers and Physios and honchos like Misson are to blame for everything. I really fail to understand how showering blame on the Admin and coaching staff solves anything.

I really find it difficult to understand the mindset of posters who just denigrate, even harder to understand posters who believe Pert is somehow involved in our scheisenhaus season.

But who am I?? Indeed, what would I know, after all.....( Just ask my wife. She'll answer that rhetorical question very succinctly, as only Polish women can.)

Just watch the examples of play. That has nothing to do with injuries. It’s basic football skills. Where are they???

Why does this Club always fall over, when others just sort out their problems and get the job done??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Just watch the examples of play. That has nothing to do with injuries. It’s basic football skills. Where are they???

Why does this Club always fall over, when others just sort out their problems and get the job done??

Not sure about how 'others' sort out their problems. Look at the Bulldogs, the Tigers, etc. If it was just 'football skills' how do you account for the positive win loss ratio in 2017 and 2018? It's more or less the same list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dieter said:

Not sure about how 'others' sort out their problems. Look at the Bulldogs, the Tigers, etc. If it was just 'football skills' how do you account for the positive win loss ratio in 2017 and 2018? It's more or less the same list.

I am talking about NOW! Last year is irrelevant 

Where have the basic football skills gone of this entire side, bar 2-3 players?

The skills were very ordinary in Round 1 2019 and in Round 12 nothing has improved

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Older demon said:

I have to disagree on this one.

John Trotter hasn't missed a game in years and David Thurin is as passionate a board member as you can get. You will see them in the background of every game irrespective of the result. The usual reporting lines exist and the board gets monthly updates. These 2 are close to everything, know the players and the line coaches and get to training. They may not be officially checking out but they are engaged in the process and very hands on with the operation without getting involved or imposing themselves

attending games and being "around" has nothing to do with day-to-day functioning. Game day makes up maybe 20% of the entire process. Thurin for example might be in the rooms during the cool down but he's not going to question the process is he? I see their involvement as being of mutual support. But they're not going to be asking for/demanding specific breakdowns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Neitz Blitz said:

You guys are a joke. The reason we never have success and players like Hogsn leave. NEGATIVE tossers

Ah no it’s because we can’t kick, handball or mark the pill mate. If we can ever fix that we are off and running. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Neitz Blitz said:

You guys are a joke. The reason we never have success and players like Hogsn leave. NEGATIVE tossers

Do you really think that negative supporters effect outcomes? Do you think Hogan will not cop it from Freo supporters? You probably think your lucky underwear works, which is obviously BS because I alone have the lucky red socks.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Social Media

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles

    MURDER BY NUMBERS by Sam the Stats Man

    The respective ladder positions of this week’s combatants tell the story of one side on the rise and the other in steep decline. Since their most recent meeting which took place early last year, the Dees and the Lions have changed positions. They are opposed to each again on the former’s home turf with the locals in fine fettle after blowing St Kilda off the park at Marvel Stadium.  The Lions’ home ground advantage has been a major consideration so far this year. They have won five out of s

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    MUD HEAP by KC from Casey

    In the opening round of the 2018 VFL season, the Casey Demons enjoyed an emphatic 107 point victory over Coburg at Piranha Park. The team was loaded with Melbourne listed players (half a dozen of them were in the team that beat Fremantle on Saturday) and the side was in its way to a grand final appearance. A season and a half later, the club returned to the same venue in the hope of kick starting a season that had gone somewhat awry under new coach Sam Radford and while they tasted victory (as y

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    PRETENDERS SENT PACKING by George on the Outer

    Fremantle, the Perth pretenders at sixth on the premiership table should have easily accounted for the Demons, sitting barely a game off the bottom of the ladder.   And for the majority of the game, it certainly looked that would be the case, until the final quarter, when the Demons stopped giving the Dockers easy chances, or making plain, dumb decisions. Not that their situation was helped by some simply appalling umpiring during the match, that kept gifting Fremantle easy scores.  Th

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    ORWELLIAN by Whispering Jack

    Please permit me to begin this rather tragic pathetic preview of Melbourne’s forthcoming game against Fremantle with some personal reflections.   Two years ago, we had visitors staying with us who are all sports fans so we arranged tickets for the entire family for the Melbourne vs Fremantle game at the MCG. The Dockers were struggling at the time while the Demons were on the up and up so I was fairly confident about the outcome. Naturally, we all left the ground bitterly disappointed.   

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    PANTSED BY THE PIES by George on the Outer

    A 41 point loss to Collingwood, combined with yet another meagre output from the Melbourne forwards, saw the Demons pantsed by the Collingwood in the Queens Birthday match. For the nth week in a row, Melbourne failed to produce a score that would trouble most sides - it’s inaccuracy alone was again enough to seal the outcome. If that final score of 7.15 were 15.7, the game would have been very different. That sort of output was exactly a repeat of the previous week against Adelaide, when fo

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    TURNAROUND by KC from Casey

    It is truly amazing what a difference eight days can make in the life and times of a football club. It was a little over a week ago that the Casey Demons side were literally crushed into submission by the Werribee Tigers at Avalon Airport Oval. The losing margin in that game was not huge but the way they struggled to produce and cohesion in their play was obvious for all to see.  On Sunday at Casey Fields as part of heritage week, the team wore the Springvale FC jumper and made its own turn

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    TEN YEARS AFTER by Whispering Jack

    There are many who would argue that Melbourne’s current woes go back a full decade to their Queens Birthday engagement of 2009 when the Demons selected a young VCE student Jack Watts to make his debut on the MCG in front of what was expected to be the club’s biggest crowd for a game described as the club’s “grand final in June”. That was the way of the world for the Dean Bailey coached Demons. The critics were skeptical of Melbourne’s decision to put a wet behind the ears schoolboy (albeit

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    TOP END HEADING SOUTH by George on the Outer

    The Demons headed north for their annual game in Darwin, but the disappointing outcome could only mean they are heading south with the all too familiar failings happening again. A Sam Weideman mark and kick for goal with only 30 seconds remaining in the match could have won it for the Demons, but the kick slid sideways and the team went down by two points.  Sam may have been devastated, but the fact that the team could only kick 1 goal 8 behinds in the final quarter lays the blame at the fe

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    MAYDAY by KC from Casey

    There’s not very much that can be said of the lacklustre performance of the Casey Demons at Avalon Airfield Oval against the Werribee Tigers on Saturday other than that it was woeful. There were however, a few small rays of hope for Demon fans, the main one being the display of defender Steven May from injury and to a lesser extent, Kade Kolodjashnij’s return after two months recovering from the effects of concussion. May was in stellar form down back, taking intercept marks, disposing of t

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    POINT OF NO RETURN by the Oracle

    Conventional wisdom says that a club reaches the point of no return in the AFL competition if it has won less than four matches at the mid point of the season.  What this means for Melbourne is that in order for it to remain in the race for a top-eight position, it must start winning games now. Moreover, It's not enough to win the next game but it must also start stringing wins together to make up for its deficit in both wins and percentage.  With so much at stake there will be no excu

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    A REAL DOWNER by KC from Casey

    When Sam Weideman kicked his third goal at the midpoint of the second quarter of Casey’s game at Downer Oval , Point Gellibrand on Sunday, he put his team 26 points ahead of the goalless Seagulls. Buoyed by the return from injury of Weideman and a number of other AFL-listed Melbourne players including Jordan Lewis, Mitch Hannan, and Jay Kennedy Harris and an impressive start to Jake Lever’s second game on return from his ACL surgery, the Demons were seemingly on top of the world. Lewis and

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    ANOTHER GIANT PROBLEM by George on the Outer

    On top of its injury problems Melbourne ran into an “in-form” GWS Giants at the MCG in a game which, apart from a final quarter junk-time spree served to highlight the club’s current problems. There’s a virtually non-existent forward line; a plethora of VFL standard players, who might be getting plenty of game experience but most will simply not be up to AFL standard; an inability to kick straight and an ability to waste simple opportunities so that they mustered up only one goal in the fir

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

×
×
  • Create New...