Rumour File

[Deevout 449]

4 minutes ago, Tony Tea said:

Laugh all you like. But Scully at Hawthorn is a better chance of a flag than Scully at GWS.

I don’t think many are laughing. Agreed he will have a much better chance of a flag at Hawthorn. 

From a personal point of view I hope he doesn’t get one. 

As for some suggesting he comes back to the Dee’s ? there are other outside runners we can Aquire.

I would add that I rarely feel this way about anyone. 

[Deevout 449]

5 minutes ago, Redleg said:

He can call it what he wants.

Not much different to what he said at the airport, that he hadn't committed to GWS yet and was only going up to have a look. Next day a fully professional video came out of him in GWS gear saying he was Giant. 

If people make statements to knowingly deceive others, what are they called?

Love your work Red!

[Jones 62]

14 hours ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

I am accepting that pick 64 for an out of contract injury prone flanker who is fringe 22 is fair.

I disagree. A pick in the 40s would have been fair.

[ding 5,126]

4 minutes ago, Baghdad Bob said:

Politicians 

Or, these days, Journalists

[Redleg 37,556]

Hanneberry and 28 for 39 and next year's Saints 2nd pick.

Can that possibly be correct.

Traded for nearly nothing.

[Ethan Tremblay 28,358]

9 minutes ago, Redleg said:

If people make statements to knowingly deceive others, what are they called?

Defence lawyers. 

[Demons11 6,404]

2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Hanneberry and 28 for 39 and next year's Saints 2nd pick.

Can that possibly be correct.

Traded for nearly nothing.

Surely Sydney must have someone in the gun 

[Redleg 37,556]

3 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Defence lawyers. 

Hope you are never in trouble.

[TRIGON 4,715]

1 minute ago, Redleg said:

Hope you are never in trouble.

Can’t possibly see how that could happen!

[Ethan Tremblay 28,358]

2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Hope you are never in trouble.

I’ll self represent. When has that ever gone wrong? 

[DeeSpencer 23,113]

6 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Hanneberry and 28 for 39 and next year's Saints 2nd pick.

Can that possibly be correct.

Traded for nearly nothing.

Swans betting that the Saints 2nd rounder next year is of more value than pick 28 this year, therefore giving them a couple of pieces to work with.

The reality is though Hanners was never going to be that expensive. 3 years at 800k on the Swans books for a guy who can't play in the guts anymore and isn't all that effective on the wing if he's not breaking the lines.

The Swans can easily fill his spot in the team and put that 800k to much better use.

[Ethan Tremblay 28,358]

Swans happy to offload Hannebery after one average season. Who are they chasing? All will be revealed in time. #ETthetradebreaker. 

Edited October 12, 2018 by Ethan Tremblay

[TRIGON 4,715]

Hogan?

[Lil_red_fire_engine 10,161]

13 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Hanneberry and 28 for 39 and next year's Saints 2nd pick.

Can that possibly be correct.

Traded for nearly nothing.

He is cooked. They need space.

[Redleg 37,556]

15 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I’ll self represent. When has that ever gone wrong? 

Have a chat to the bloke in cell block h cell 56 and see if he has any advice. 

[Redleg 37,556]

11 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Swans happy to offload Hannebery after one average season. Who are they chasing? All will be revealed in time. #ETthereadebreaker. 

You are the best. McLure and Morris can eat your dust.

[Ethan Tremblay 28,358]

1 minute ago, Redleg said:

You are the best. McLure and Morris can eat your dust.

I’d love to be able to divulge more but I can’t at this time. 

[Wilson7 2,474]

 

[Ethan Tremblay 28,358]

Can’t be talking to the opposition unless you want to be traded there. Gone. 

[deebug 1,754]

1 minute ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Can’t be talking to the opposition unless you want to be traded there. Gone. 

What could we get for him?

[John Demonic 4,794]

12 minutes ago, DavidNeitz9 said:

 

Just to play along with this rumour/hypothetical: I was thinking which player we'll send to Brisbane this morning, in order for them to send something substantial to us or Freo, which would allow for Freo to get what they want out of the Neale trade. So, Brisbane would keep their pick 23, get Neale and Hunt. And lose their 2019 first round pick and this years Pick 5 to MFC, Freo keep pick 11 and get Hogan. We'd probably send a 2nd round pick back to brisbane.

Edited October 12, 2018 by johndemonic

[deebug 1,754]

3 minutes ago, johndemonic said:

10 minutes ago, DavidNeitz9 said:

 

 

Freo would sook over that

[DubDee 20,549]

Wouldn’t want to lose hunt. He value is very low atm and I expect him to bounce back hard. 

[DV8 2,271]

4 hours ago, Redleg said:

From the AFL site summing up the clubs, this is ours:

If	there's one club which has become ruthless in every facet of its operation ...
then	it is this one. It is all-in on the pursuit of success. It could still end up ugly. But we love the bull-at-a-gate desperation it is displaying on and off field.

'Watta difference', an AFL approved board makes to this footy club...  It looks more "Well-Oval'd"... than 'Rounded',  these days.

 

Itza Footy Club once again.........

[DV8 2,271]

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

The major reason I dislike him so much.

Lacking Honor,  in the Face o` Integrity.

 

All for a fist-full of cash. 

 

Live by the sword, and die by the same.

 

We all choose, one way or the other... what way we live buy.

 

.

Edited October 12, 2018 by DV8