Trade rumours

[Wiseblood 24,637]

9 minutes ago, Deecisive said:

why would we not just take freo's pick 5 for Hogan and maybe swap some other back end picks, as he is worth more than just pick 5 as he is an established mature talent that lifts their side immediately.

We then give adelaide our pick 10 and our second round pick. 

I can't believe you are giving any air time to such a ridiculous rumour. 

Hogan is going nowhere. 

[Dr. Gonzo 24,235]

On 16/09/2017 at 6:51 PM, WERRIDEE said:

In the paper it said Lang was on the move. Any interest? Someone posted that Geelong was the 3rd team Melbourne talking to. Is he the player? He played well last night.

No thanks, would rather Motlop or Menzel

Edited September 17, 2017 by Dr. Gonzo

[Demon Disciple 12,180]

1 hour ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

No thanks, would rather Motlop or Menzel

Lang was lucky that his only decent game he has ever played was in a SF.

[GCDee 3,199]

Would love for us to chase Menzel, adds major x factor and class to our forward 50 and is a huge upgrade on Harmes. 

And he is a free agent wouldn't cost us a pick. 

 

 

 

 

[beelzebub 23,380]

12 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

No thanks, would rather Motlop or Menzel

Menzel strikes me as a very Melb style deal.  Dare I say it..a 'moneyball' style thing.  i.e  A good player ( maybe not a star but the other side of handy ) Someone who has enough years left in him to be a sound investment by us, as much as by him  in us !! ( if that makes sense )

Cats will offload a few. We missed out last time  

[Xavierrodway 14]

To be honest, I'd love to see Watts go. Absolutely nothing against him, in fact I love the mean, but I'd like nothing more than to see him improve and succeed. Unfortunately, and  I hope I'm wrong, I just can't see him living up to his potential at the Dees. No matter what happens, he'll always be one of my favourites

Edited September 18, 2017 by Xavierrodway

[beelzebub 23,380]

7 minutes ago, Xavierrodway said:

To be honest, I'd love to see Watts go. Absolutely nothing against him, in fact I love the mean, but I'd like nothing more than to see him improve and succeed. Unfortunately, and  I hope I'm wrong, I just can't see him living up to his potential at the Dees. No matter what happens, he'll always be one of my favourites

It's not even so much about losing Watts...Its about getting something better, and someone that is able to be traded for.

I dont see that person. Becomes moot for mine

[Demon_JB 1,385]

Just heard from my old man who deals with a few clients who are close to Melbourne officials,  that Gawn could be on the move as we are looking to use him to secure Lever and retain our top picks to then get Gaff. They believe with the way the game is evolving that having that extra runner in the midfield in the form of Watts / Pedo / Tmac rotating in ruck we are less reliable on just winning hit outs and become more unpredictable.

Very complex deal, up to 4 clubs involved something along the lines of Gawn to GWS, their 1st rounder + 2nd rounder to Carlton, Gibbs to Adelaide, Lever to Melbourne. Our pick 10 for Gaff and looking to land another experienced player through free agency from Geelong, that's all I know (starting to think it's Motlop, wants a fresh start and would compliment as another outside runner and also to help support Jeffy and look to improve his forward line pressure)

Don't shoot the messenger. Cheers.

[jackaub 1,402]

5 minutes ago, juzzk1d said:

Just heard from my old man who deals with a few clients who are close to Melbourne officials,  that Gawn could be on the move as we are looking to use him to secure Lever and retain our top picks to then get Gaff. They believe with the way the game is evolving that having that extra runner in the midfield in the form of Watts / Pedo / Tmac rotating in ruck we are less reliable on just winning hit outs and become more unpredictable.

Very complex deal, up to 4 clubs involved something along the lines of Gawn to GWS, their 1st rounder + 2nd rounder to Carlton, Gibbs to Adelaide, Lever to Melbourne. Our pick 10 for Gaff and looking to land another experienced player through free agency from Geelong, that's all I know (starting to think it's Motlop, wants a fresh start and would compliment as another outside runner and also to help support Jeffy and look to improve his forward line pressure)

Don't shoot the messenger. Cheers.

Not Motlop please just the sort to fail at Mfc due to soft culture

[Ouch! 2,266]

18 minutes ago, juzzk1d said:

Just heard from my old man who deals with a few clients who are close to Melbourne officials,  that Gawn could be on the move as we are looking to use him to secure Lever and retain our top picks to then get Gaff. They believe with the way the game is evolving that having that extra runner in the midfield in the form of Watts / Pedo / Tmac rotating in ruck we are less reliable on just winning hit outs and become more unpredictable.

Very complex deal, up to 4 clubs involved something along the lines of Gawn to GWS, their 1st rounder + 2nd rounder to Carlton, Gibbs to Adelaide, Lever to Melbourne. Our pick 10 for Gaff and looking to land another experienced player through free agency from Geelong, that's all I know (starting to think it's Motlop, wants a fresh start and would compliment as another outside runner and also to help support Jeffy and look to improve his forward line pressure)

Don't shoot the messenger. Cheers.

Not shooting the messenger, but we lose Gawn for Lever? 
There would need to be bit more coming back than that you would think.  Also what doesn't make sense to me is that whilst I agree runners in the midfield is the way things are heading, why GWS who, if we are completely honest, have way too many quality talls to fit in already.
GWS looked a lot better without Mumford and Cameron in their side.... ie more run and more unpredictable. They have Patton, Simpson and Lobb as well. They seem to be playing Lobb out of position up forward, and they don't look right with Lobb, Cameron, Patton and Mumford in their team. Why add Gawn?

TBH the main thing I am taking out of any of these conversations is that we still need to turn over some of the list, and that the club is looking at all options.  

Edited September 18, 2017 by Ouch!

[buck_nekkid 5,880]

The olny fly in the ointment is that we are getting rid of Spencer.  We have no 'insurance' if Gawn goes, and the ruck concept comes back into fashion.  We need good big men that can take contested marks (we were thrashed in this department all year).  

Gawn is worth more than Lever, so we would want to get a bucketload back if we were to allow him to move.  It would strike me as nuts, but I am not the FD.  Better is to redefine Gawn as a forward/ruck and rotate him more heavily.

[Willmoy1947 4,099]

Don't think it matters much anymore. Two players who have major knee operations featuring in possible trades.

Playing groups in old, old clubs playing like sixteen year olds, after a game that would make any other side prostate on the ground. Another team who have won one final in a thousand years with a Sheedy type snipability, as Flag be all to end all favorite.

Not forgetting the new TEN strikes and your out policy that comes in next season.

And still the MEDIA haven't got the guts to do anything....

[binman 43,137]

4 minutes ago, willmoy said:

Don't think it matters much anymore. Two players who have major knee operations featuring in possible trades.

Playing groups in old, old clubs playing like sixteen year olds, after a game that would make any other side prostate on the ground. Another team who have won one final in a thousand years with a Sheedy type snipability, as Flag be all to end all favorite.

Not forgetting the new TEN strikes and your out policy that comes in next season.

And still the MEDIA haven't got the guts to do anything....

https://youtu.be/Qw9oX-kZ_9k

[Dee Zephyr 19,267]

Wow, now Gawn is rumoured, so that makes Watts, Salem, Hogan even Tyson thrown up as possible trades to secure Lever.

Maybe we should go after Nathan Krakouer instead, would come cheap and I just read he busted up a taxi on the weekend. 

[Lord Travis 10,743]

Where did you hear the Gawn rumour @Demon77?

Watts, Tyson and Salem realistically could both be traded as they have currency and are replaceable.
Hogan you obviously would not trade unless he demanded to be traded back to a WA club due to home sickness/family/health. If Hogan did leave we'd get a good trade coming our way so while it would be a loss, it could also be used as an opportunity to grow the list itself, similar to when Scully left.
I doubt we would trade Gawn as we have no other ruckman bar King on the list now with Spencer gone. We are already understocked for rucks, so why would we trade an AA quality one and leave ourselves with only a rookie? Gawn is also massive for us off field for marketing, more so than any of our other players IMO.

[beelzebub 23,380]

28 minutes ago, juzzk1d said:

Just heard from my old man who deals with a few clients who are close to Melbourne officials,  that Gawn could be on the move as we are looking to use him to secure Lever and retain our top picks to then get Gaff. They believe with the way the game is evolving that having that extra runner in the midfield in the form of Watts / Pedo / Tmac rotating in ruck we are less reliable on just winning hit outs and become more unpredictable.

Very complex deal, up to 4 clubs involved something along the lines of Gawn to GWS, their 1st rounder + 2nd rounder to Carlton, Gibbs to Adelaide, Lever to Melbourne. Our pick 10 for Gaff and looking to land another experienced player through free agency from Geelong, that's all I know (starting to think it's Motlop, wants a fresh start and would compliment as another outside runner and also to help support Jeffy and look to improve his forward line pressure)

Don't shoot the messenger. Cheers.

[Dee Zephyr 19,267]

1 minute ago, Lord Travis said:

Where did you hear the Gawn rumour @Demon77?

 

About 7 posts up.

[Die Hard Demon 1,224]

26 minutes ago, juzzk1d said:

Just heard from my old man who deals with a few clients who are close to Melbourne officials,  that Gawn could be on the move as we are looking to use him to secure Lever and retain our top picks to then get Gaff. They believe with the way the game is evolving that having that extra runner in the midfield in the form of Watts / Pedo / Tmac rotating in ruck we are less reliable on just winning hit outs and become more unpredictable.

Very complex deal, up to 4 clubs involved something along the lines of Gawn to GWS, their 1st rounder + 2nd rounder to Carlton, Gibbs to Adelaide, Lever to Melbourne. Our pick 10 for Gaff and looking to land another experienced player through free agency from Geelong, that's all I know (starting to think it's Motlop, wants a fresh start and would compliment as another outside runner and also to help support Jeffy and look to improve his forward line pressure)

Don't shoot the messenger. Cheers.

Not the worst outcome .. We played some of our best footy this year without Gawn.. Watts, pedo and tmac were incredibly effective rotating through the middle. And come to think of it.. Mummy is 31 now and clearly past his best. Getting Gawn as their permanent ruck makes sense. Could be a huge left field trade brewing here.

[Lord Travis 10,743]

4 minutes ago, Demon77 said:

About 7 posts up.

Oops, my bad. My page didn't refresh properly for some reason and I missed a chunk of new posts since I last visited the thread!

I don't like that Gawn trade if it is essentially Gawn for Lever. I don't understand why we would trade an AA quality ruckman in his prime when we have no other ruckmen on the list. I agree the game requires more run and midfielders these days than in previous year, but the AFL could just as easily change the rules in a year or two the way things have been going! We also struggle for marking targets all around the ground, and when Max is in form he clunks them as a release option from defensive 50, or a saving mark inside defensive 50, or a mark inside 50 to generate a shot at goal. He's more than just a tap ruckman. Seems a strange trade...

Would love Lever, but the price has to be right. More importantly, the list needs to be balanced.

[Dee Zephyr 19,267]

Just now, Lord Travis said:

Oops, my bad. My page didn't refresh properly for some reason and I missed a chunk of new posts since I last visited the thread!

I don't like that Gawn trade if it is essentially Gawn for Lever. I don't understand why we would trade an AA quality ruckman in his prime when we have no other ruckmen on the list. I agree the game requires more run and midfielders these days than in previous year, but the AFL could just as easily change the rules in a year or two the way things have been going! We also struggle for marking targets all around the ground, and when Max is in form he clunks them as a release option from defensive 50, or a saving mark inside defensive 50, or a mark inside 50 to generate a shot at goal. He's more than just a tap ruckman. Seems a strange trade...

Would love Lever, but the price has to be right. More importantly, the list needs to be balanced.

Couldn't agree more, we are one of the worst contested marking sides if not the worst in the comp and to trade Max for Lever doesn't make sense to me.

If Hogan or Max were to be traded and I would suggest they are two of our best at contesting marks I would want someone coming back that does the same or better.

Lever is great at intercepting but I'm not sure if that's a like for like.

[beelzebub 23,380]

Mad monday has arrived !! 

[Ted Lasso 19,521]

Max gawn is not on the trade table, he is deep in negotiations about a long term extension. 

Depending on who you believe Salem is also not on the table. 

 

[DemonOX 8,791]

48 minutes ago, juzzk1d said:

Just heard from my old man who deals with a few clients who are close to Melbourne officials,  that Gawn could be on the move as we are looking to use him to secure Lever and retain our top picks to then get Gaff. They believe with the way the game is evolving that having that extra runner in the midfield in the form of Watts / Pedo / Tmac rotating in ruck we are less reliable on just winning hit outs and become more unpredictable.

Very complex deal, up to 4 clubs involved something along the lines of Gawn to GWS, their 1st rounder + 2nd rounder to Carlton, Gibbs to Adelaide, Lever to Melbourne. Our pick 10 for Gaff and looking to land another experienced player through free agency from Geelong, that's all I know (starting to think it's Motlop, wants a fresh start and would compliment as another outside runner and also to help support Jeffy and look to improve his forward line pressure)

Don't shoot the messenger. Cheers.

Geez juzz lucki I was sittin down when i read this. 

Thanks for sharing and brace urself for the negative comments. 

[jackaub 1,402]

2 minutes ago, Abe said:

Max gawn is not on the trade table, he is deep in negotiations about a long term extension. 

Depending on who you believe Salem is also not on the table. 

 

Now thats a shame never understood what others see in Salem  but there you go 

[Deecisive 1,709]

14 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

I can't believe you are giving any air time to such a ridiculous rumour. 

Hogan is going nowhere. 

Nothing is certain in football when it comes to trading. Hogan going home would depend primarily on if he wants to be traded back to WA. if he does the club will do what they can to extract what value they can out of the deal. There are very very few footballers on our list that are untouchable.