Jump to content

WELCOME TO THE MELBOURNE FOOTBALL CLUB - JORDAN LEWIS



Recommended Posts

 

I recall it was said when we signed Lewis that we would be altering his role slightly. Was there any further clarification on this? Any ideas what we might have in mind?

Backup ruck/forward.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Name a high profile player who has been honest with their intentions prior to year end.  Danger, Buddy, Chip, Scully, O'Meara.

Scully is no different to all of them, was much younger and the subject of huge media pressure because GWS was going to be a first year club.  Scully's decision was NOT just about money, it was as much about us as a club and those that don't recognize that are silly.  We were dysfunctional.  And I know one shouldn't Pizz on a statue, but the hounding of Scully by Jim was a  meaningful factor in Scully's decision to move.

He left, he made a totally logical decision to benefit himself and his family, we were over compensated and those that still hate are just haters and in my view misguided and silly.

Scully is a large reason we are so bullish today and whilst he didn't do it for that reason I hold not one dot of malice towards him. 

 

Do you have a source for the claims that

(a) Stynes hounded Scully and 

(b) the "hounding" was a meaningful factor in his decision to leave?

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I recall it was said when we signed Lewis that we would be altering his role slightly. Was there any further clarification on this? Any ideas what we might have in mind?

Inside mid/wing/half back would be my guess.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

How dare the club president want an honest answer so that we could prepare for the future.

It's actually not the Presidents role. I imagine Bartlett didn't play a role in Jesse's contract extension but left it to list management and the footy department. 

There is ample discussion on the role of a Board in earlier DL threads and for reference just compare how the club is run now compared to prior Boards. 

BTW do you think Buddy, Chip and Paddy were honest about their intentions? I don't really want to go here and I'm surprised Jack asked the question days after my post and if he did want to know the answer why he didn't PM me. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm not surprised and I don't believe the story because I have a different understanding - one that came directly from the horse's mouth.

On 31 August 2011, I attended the Fawkner Hotel and with about 20 others, had dinner with four members of Melbourne's team - Tom Scully, Cale Morton, Stef Martin and Max Gawn. It was the week before the last game of the season, one which he eventually withdrew from due to general soreness.

For a time during the evening, I sat next to Tom and in our discussions (heard by others), made him aware that my family had a business connection going back several years with his father's roofing company (which he had recently resigned from as a Director). He seemed nervous and distracted during the evening, often checking his mobile phone.

Tom spoke about the lingering issues that he had with his knee that year and said he felt that they were all manageable and that he would be over them after the break in between seasons. 

On the subject of his future, he stated that he had not been involved in any negotiations with Melbourne or anyone else. He told me that he had not "seen any offers" but that after the game on Sunday, he would sit down with his management to decide between then and the B & F in a few weeks' time.

I asked him how he felt the club had treated him in the circumstances and he said he couldn't be happier. They hadn't put any pressure on him and were aware that he would be talking to his management at the end of the season which he said had been his position since March.

On Jimmy Stynes who had been fighting cancer for two years and was extremely ill at the time, he said he was full of admiration and he had no issues with Jim's comments earlier in the year. He said he didn't even believe they were directed specifically at him. 

For the record, I thought after that night that Scully was gone. I respected fully that his decision was a difficult one but, on the figures I had heard that he was being offered, there was no real choice. His departure was announced about a week and a half later. 

Usually, I would be more than somewhat bemused that five years after the event, a story emerges that flies in the face of everything that I was told that night but I'm not any more because I've heard this sort of scuttlebutt before.

Several months after Scully departed, stories started emerging that he left the Demons' 2010 end of season trip to China because of the drinking culture of the players (Tom was apparently a teetotaler). At the time he returned, Phil Scully told my brother-in-law that he left early because of serious health issues involving a family member. 

When I hear allegations made about a dead man that he can't respond to, it brings out the cynic in me.

  • Like 29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/10/2016 at 10:41 AM, hemingway said:

Last para is the guts of the issue. Let's just call it honesty or lack thereof.  I don't blame Scully for going. It was not as if he just got a better offer. He was given an offer that was Huge. An offer to set himself up for life, injury or no injury. He was a young impressionable guy with older cunning men all around him, telling him what to do. Father and Sheedy to name the best or worst examples. And what the older wiser heads should have told young Tom is that it is always best to be upfront and honest with people. No one likes being lied to.  However, when we are young, we are inexperienced in life, we take risks, and we are easily influenced by peers and our elders. We take advice from others which is sometimes wrong. we make wrong decisions based on this advice.   It is not that Scully made the wrong decision, it is how he and his camp behaved and the perception created that he was not honest in his dealings.

So you and the football world would have preferred for Scully to announce his departure to another club 12 months before?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23 October 2016 at 6:52 PM, Skuit said:

I recall it was said when we signed Lewis that we would be altering his role slightly. Was there any further clarification on this? Any ideas what we might have in mind?

I think we'll probably see Lewis, Bernie and Jones rotate through the middle and across half back. Lewis and Vince in particular, as they're both great users of the ball and are very composed under pressure. That might also help push Hunt up to the wing.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luther said:

I think we'll probably see Lewis, Bernie and Jones rotate through the middle and across half back. Lewis and Vince in particular, as they're both great users of the ball and are very composed under pressure. That might also help push Hunt up to the wing.

I'd be inclined to agree with all of that, except I'd try Jones across half forward instead. Play to his strengths. IMO, he's not the great kick, but his attack on the man and the ball is first rate. That could also prolong his career too once our younger guys take over. In 2018-2019, the guys that should be playing the majority of minutes in the middle are Oliver, Viney, Tyson, Brayshaw, Petracca and even Salem. Jones should play a little time there, but I think he's going to have to play half forward and half back the majority of time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

I'm not surprised and I don't believe the story

I'm pleased you've offered a different view.  Without disclosing my sources I will say they consisted of Directors of the Club, FD personnel with whom I worked and players I'd known for a number of years and still see. There were a number of similar accounts.

If you choose to believe someone who most believe lied to the club about his intentions for the best part of a year sobeit. Your comments that "he stated that he had not been involved in any negotiations with Melbourne or anyone else" were clearly wrong. If you think he would have confided in you at the dinner I think you're being a little naïve.

You know the role I played at the club and I'm surprised you wanted clarification of my source and expected me to disclose them. I hope in the quotation above you're not suggesting I'm lying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


3 hours ago, Vogon Poetry said:

I'm pleased you've offered a different view.  Without disclosing my sources I will say they consisted of Directors of the Club, FD personnel with whom I worked and players I'd known for a number of years and still see. There were a number of similar accounts.

If you choose to believe someone who most believe lied to the club about his intentions for the best part of a year sobeit. Your comments that "he stated that he had not been involved in any negotiations with Melbourne or anyone else" were clearly wrong. If you think he would have confided in you at the dinner I think you're being a little naïve.

You know the role I played at the club and I'm surprised you wanted clarification of my source and expected me to disclose them. I hope in the quotation above you're not suggesting I'm lying.

The thread is about Jordan Lewis so if you don't mind I'll begin my response by referring to him. 

Lewis is 30 years old. He has 264 games of AFL football behind him and has played in four premierships. He is mature, a family man and handled himself with assurance and self-confidence over his decision to leave Hawthorn. I think the football world gave him great credit for this and he deserved it. Very few true Hawthorn supporters are going to argue with him about this or boo him when he runs out on the field against their team wearing a Melbourne jumper.

By contrast, Tom Scully was a mere kid at 20 on the night when the events I described took place. I don't have the slightest doubt that he wasn't being entirely open and frank with me during our conversation. I mentioned how nervous and distracted he seemed and how he often checked his mobile phone during the evening. This happened most when he was asked about the knee injury that had affected his season and about his future. I never believed for a minute his claim that he hadn't "seen any offers" and that he would sit down with his management to decide on his future after the game. That decision had been done and dusted for some time by then.

There were however, other parts of the conversations we had that night (and others were also taking part) during which the nervousness wasn't so apparent. He joked about Sam Blease having a big head, he talked about his family life and his experiences at the club including his respect for Jim Stynes. I'm prepared to accept what he said about those things as truthful. His obfuscations only came on the point of his future because he had a very good reason not to reveal the truth.

Tom Scully was about to leave Melbourne and I believe there was a single motivating factor behind the move - the money. I don't believe for a second that Stynes "hounded" him, nor do I believe he was involved in any conduct that constituted a "meaningful factor in Scully's decision to move". 

I stand completely by my point of view. The conversation took place in front of others including some of his teammates and I also had discussions with people involved at the club including a Board Member that reinforce my view.

I'm not surprised however, that you were told these stories. I'm not suggesting you lied but there were clear divisions of opinion at the time and there were those who had their reasons for pushing the self-serving line they gave you. There were people who had reason to dislike Jimmy - perhaps because he led the move to push them out of power. We're all too aware of the power struggles that blighted the club, causing great damage over too long a period that thankfully has now come to an end.

I'm puzzled however, that you think I'm being naive about this - "he stated that he had not been involved in any negotiations with Melbourne or anyone else". I think the statement was correct. The negotiations were conducted by his manager with his father looming large in the background. He was a 20 year old kid who wanted to play footy and while adults did the real dirty work for him, it wasn't only the Scully camp that had unclean hands in this.

That's why in the end, I'm happy that the thread is about Jordan Lewis and I'm clear in the knowledge that the club is heading in the right direction with people of his ilk in the foreground and a lot of very positive people in the background.

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

The thread is about Jordan Lewis so if you don't mind I'll begin my response by referring to him. 

Lewis is 30 years old. He has 264 games of AFL football behind him and has played in four premierships. He is mature, a family man and handled himself with assurance and self-confidence over his decision to leave Hawthorn. I think the football world gave him great credit for this and he deserved it. Very few true Hawthorn supporters are going to argue with him about this or boo him when he runs out on the field against their team wearing a Melbourne jumper.

By contrast, Tom Scully was a mere kid at 20 on the night when the events I described took place. I don't have the slightest doubt that he wasn't being entirely open and frank with me during our conversation. I mentioned how nervous and distracted he seemed and how he often checked his mobile phone during the evening. This happened most when he was asked about the knee injury that had affected his season and about his future. I never believed for a minute his claim that he hadn't "seen any offers" and that he would sit down with his management to decide on his future after the game. That decision had been done and dusted for some time by then.

There were however, other parts of the conversations we had that night (and others were also taking part) during which the nervousness wasn't so apparent. He joked about Sam Blease having a big head, he talked about his family life and his experiences at the club including his respect for Jim Stynes. I'm prepared to accept what he said about those things as truthful. His obfuscations only came on the point of his future because he had a very good reason not to reveal the truth.

Tom Scully was about to leave Melbourne and I believe there was a single motivating factor behind the move - the money. I don't believe for a second that Stynes "hounded" him, nor do I believe he was involved in any conduct that constituted a "meaningful factor in Scully's decision to move". 

I stand completely by my point of view. The conversation took place in front of others including some of his teammates and I also had discussions with people involved at the club including a Board Member that reinforce my view.

I'm not surprised however, that you were told these stories. I'm not suggesting you lied but there were clear divisions of opinion at the time and there were those who had their reasons for pushing the self-serving line they gave you. There were people who had reason to dislike Jimmy - perhaps because he led the move to push them out of power. We're all too aware of the power struggles that blighted the club, causing great damage over too long a period that thankfully has now come to an end.

I'm puzzled however, that you think I'm being naive about this - "he stated that he had not been involved in any negotiations with Melbourne or anyone else". I think the statement was correct. The negotiations were conducted by his manager with his father looming large in the background. He was a 20 year old kid who wanted to play footy and while adults did the real dirty work for him, it wasn't only the Scully camp that had unclean hands in this.

That's why in the end, I'm happy that the thread is about Jordan Lewis and I'm clear in the knowledge that the club is heading in the right direction with people of his ilk in the foreground and a lot of very positive people in the background.

Brilliant! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom Scully was a 20 year old who was offered an amazing amount of money so i never thought he would do anything but go, i bet if you offered the same money to Brayshaw, Oliver or Petracca they'd take it also. 

Jordan Lewis on the other hand is an awesome pick up for us, i can see him being a real leader for the club next year and a huge on field asset, should be in our best handful of players right from the word go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/10/2016 at 9:01 AM, Vogon Poetry said:

It's actually not the Presidents role. I imagine Bartlett didn't play a role in Jesse's contract extension but left it to list management and the footy department. 

There is ample discussion on the role of a Board in earlier DL threads and for reference just compare how the club is run now compared to prior Boards. 

BTW do you think Buddy, Chip and Paddy were honest about their intentions? I don't really want to go here and I'm surprised Jack asked the question days after my post and if he did want to know the answer why he didn't PM me. 

I know Chip was, only from conversations I had with him, if as you state you have sources within the club, you will know that this was the opinion of most, as Chip invested in the club right until the end of the season, then went away and decided which way to go

 

18 hours ago, Vogon Poetry said:

 If you think he would have confided in you at the dinner I think you're being a little naïve.

You are also asking us to believe that people within the club confided in you, I get enough grief from the conversations I have with players, but being 'trusted' I get a lot of straight answers to questions, not all of which I put on here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jeck wartz said:

Tom Scully was a 20 year old who was offered an amazing amount of money so i never thought he would do anything but go, i bet if you offered the same money to Brayshaw, Oliver or Petracca they'd take it also. 

Jordan Lewis on the other hand is an awesome pick up for us, i can see him being a real leader for the club next year and a huge on field asset, should be in our best handful of players right from the word go

Paragraph two yes, paragraph one no. My opinion, and the reason being they are smarter and more loyal and far different circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Satyriconhome said:

I know Chip was, only from conversations I had with him, if as you state you have sources within the club, you will know that this was the opinion of most, as Chip invested in the club right until the end of the season, then went away and decided which way to go

 

You are also asking us to believe that people within the club confided in you, I get enough grief from the conversations I have with players, but being 'trusted' I get a lot of straight answers to questions, not all of which I put on here

You've been told about this Saty, time and again. I know you like to live in la-la-land, but there's no way AFL footballers go around confessing their true intentions to random strangers who watch training sessions.

That said, I think it's more likely Frawley was pushed by us and probably would have been happy to stay in the end.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, A F said:

That said, I think it's more likely Frawley was pushed by us and probably would have been happy to stay in the end.

I'm not sure if he was pushed, but once we were told by the AFL what the likely compo would be, we weren't hesitant in letting him go.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    EASYBEATS by Meggs

    A beautiful sunny Friday afternoon, with a light breeze and a strong Windy Hill crowd set the scene, inviting one team to seize the day and take the important four points on offer. For the Demons it was not a good Friday, easily beaten by an all-time largest losing margin of 65 points.   Essendon threw themselves into action today, winning most of the contests and had three early goals with Daria Bannister on fire.  In contrast the Demons were dropping marks, hesitant in close and comm

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 4

    DEFUSE THE BOMBERS by Meggs

    Last Saturday’s crushing loss to Fremantle, after being three goals ahead at three quarter time, should be motivation enough to bounce back for this very winnable Round 5 clash at Windy Hill. A first-time venue for the Melbourne AFLW team, this should be a familiar suburban, windy, footy environment for the players.   Essendon were brave and competitive last week against ladder leader Adelaide at Sturt’s home ground. A familiar name, Maddison Gay, was the Bombers best player with

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 33

    BLOW THE SIREN by Meggs

    Fremantle hosted the Demons on a sunny 20-degree Saturdayafternoon winning the toss and electing to defend in the first quarter against the 3-goal breeze favouring the Parry Street end. There was method here, as this would give the comeback queens, the Dockers, last use of the breeze. The Melbourne Coach had promised an improved performance, and we did start better than previous weeks, winning the ball out of the middle, using the breeze advantage and connecting to the forwards. 

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    GETAWAY by Meggs

    Calling all fit players. Expect every available Melbourne player to board the Virgin cross-continent flight to Perth for this Round 4 clash on Saturday afternoon at Fremantle Oval. It promises to be keenly contested, though Fremantle is the bookies clear favourite.  If we lose, finals could be remoter than Rottnest Island especially following on from the Dees 50-point dismantlement by North Melbourne last Sunday.  There are 8 remaining matches, over the next 7 weeks.  To Meggs’

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    DRUBBING by Meggs

    With Casey Fields basking in sunshine, an enthusiastic throng of young Demons fans formed a guard of honour for the evergreen and much admired 75-gamer Paxy Paxman. As the home team ran out to play, Paxy’s banner promised that the Demons would bounce back from last week’s loss to Brisbane and reign supreme.   Disappointingly, the Kangaroos dominated the match to win by 50 points, but our Paxy certainly did her bit.  She was clearly our best player, sweeping well in defence.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 4

    GARNER STRENGTH by Meggs

    In keeping with our tough draw theme, Week 3 sees Melbourne take on flag favourites, North Melbourne, at Casey Fields this Sunday at 1:05pm.  The weather forecast looks dry, a coolish 14 degrees and will be characteristically gusty.  Remember when Casey Fields was considered our fortress?  The Demons have lost two of their past three matches at the Field of Dreams, so opposition teams commute down the Princes Highway with more optimism these days.  The Dees held the highe

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    ALLY’S FIELDS by Meggs

    It was a sunny morning at Casey Fields, as Demon supporters young and old formed a guard of honour for fan favourite and 50-gamer Alyssa Bannan.  Banno’s banner stated the speedster was the ‘fastest 50 games’ by an AFLW player ever.   For Dees supporters, today was not our day and unfortunately not for Banno either. A couple of opportunities emerged for our number 6 but alas there was no sizzle.   Brisbane atoned for last week’s record loss to North Melbourne, comprehensively out

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    GOOD MORNING by Meggs

    If you are driving or training it to Cranbourne on Saturday, don’t forget to set your alarm clock. The Melbourne Demons play the reigning premiers Brisbane Lions at Casey Fields this Saturday, with the bounce of the ball at 11:05am.  Yes, that’s AM.   The AFLW fixture shows deference to the AFL men’s finals games.  So, for the men it’s good afternoon and good evening and for the women it’s good morning.     The Lions were wounded last week by 44 points, their highest ever los

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 3

    HORE ON FIRE by Meggs

    The 40,000 seat $319 million redeveloped Kardinia Park Stadium was nowhere near capacity last night but the strong, noisy contingent of Melbourne supporters led by the DeeArmy journeyed to Geelong to witness a high-quality battle between two of the best teams in AFLW.   The Cats entered the arena to the blasting sounds of Zombie Nation and made a hot start kicking the first 2 goals. They brought tremendous forward half pressure, and our newly renovated defensive unit looked shaky.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 11
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...