Patrick Dangerfield

[Ethan Tremblay 28,358]

Will go out on a limb here with what has been said and what I have heard as late as this morning.

Dangerfield to Dees for pick 2 + Toumpas plus exchange of later picks

Shiel to Dees for pick 3 + possible player or exchange of later picks

And thats all folks!

Sounds excellent to me.

The question is though, are you still drunk?

[beelzebub 22,225]

My cynicism meter just went off the scale

My mind agrees OD, but my heart wishes

[SaberFang 7,141]

Is it trade week yet?

[Jakovich13 16]

I was at the Sept Club too in the SEN tent...saw Danger who was well and truly past talking at that stage. Don't blame him either. Wouldn't be in the

Oh, saw a lot of love between Molloy and Tex Walker. I have a sore neck from looking up at Nic Nat. Mathew Richardson, nice bloke, was tired of doing selfies. Used the gents beside Heppell - didn't think it was the right time to mention supplements though.

How good was Nic Nat on the decks

[DeeZee 6,731]

The Sunday footy show seemed to think we were offering picks one and two for Danger.

[Moonshadow 16,160]

The Sunday footy show seemed to think we were offering picks one and two for Danger.

That would be Dangerous.

[beelzebub 22,225]

The Sunday footy show seemed to think we were offering picks one and two for Danger.

we dont have pick 1

[Gorgoroth 12,308]

would be illegal, we don't have pick one.

Unless the saints are giving us theirs for free

[DeeZee 6,731]

we dont have pick 1

Sorry , I meant 2 and 3

[beelzebub 22,225]

I reckon that is the understatement of the week cf.

Agree why on earth would the MFC look attractive ?

OD in all seriousness Id agree with you about the OLD Melbourne , but the NEW MFC is a different beast.

Going along same vein as why I dont rate Chip, because he wants ready made , many a really good player might like to be part of a new fabric and add to it. Cull half a dozen deadwood and in place insert 6 decent players and its a very different team.

This would be exactly what Roos will tell any prospectives. Melbourne can be every bit as good as you ( player ) can help make it

[Bang Bang Bang 5,452]

The Sunday footy show seemed to think we were offering picks one and two for Danger.

Well I didn't see the segment. If it was Barrett, as much as we all hate him, he does seem to have reasonable sources from this club (first to break Hogan's injury, and Clark's comeback) so wouldn't surprise me if we are going to do it. I hope its true.

[jabberwocky 2,301]

Used the gents beside Heppell - didn't think it was the right time to mention supplements though.

shrinkage?

[Deeoldfart 7,720]

Will go out on a limb here with what has been said and what I have heard as late as this morning.

Dangerfield to Dees for pick 2 + Toumpas plus exchange of later picks

Shiel to Dees for pick 3 + possible player or exchange of later picks

And thats all folks!

I hope it's a stout tree Demoneyes, and not some bloody sapling straight out of a glass house.

[beelzebub 22,225]

Sorry , I meant 2 and 3

dont get me wrong....Id be happy to use pick 1 to help get Danger. Saints are a mess, they might not even notice !!

[dee-luded 2,958]

Will go out on a limb here with what has been said and what I have heard as late as this morning.

Dangerfield to Dees for pick 2 + Toumpas plus exchange of later picks

Shiel to Dees for pick 3 + possible player or exchange of later picks

And thats all folks!

I hope it's a stout tree Demoneyes, and not some bloody sapling straight out of a glass house.

LoL

[Demoneyes 562]

Sounds excellent to me.

The question is though, are you still drunk?

Fully sober thanks E.T. Just a bit of a headache.

[Daz's Dee's 113]

Will go out on a limb here with what has been said and what I have heard as late as this morning.

huge win for the dees just can't see it to be honest. Think we will trade and Draft well again no huge names but some good talent in the door think the Goodwin deal was perfect timing

Dangerfield to Dees for pick 2 + Toumpas plus exchange of later picks

Shiel to Dees for pick 3 + possible player or exchange of later picks

And thats all folks!

[TRIGON 4,715]

shrinkage?

and then it turns green and

d

r

o

p

s

o

f

f

[Scipio 5,868]

shrinkage?

I can't help wondering whether the stones were affected by those supplements...

[TRIGON 4,715]

Back on topic. Re Cameron, Roos has called for mids mids and more mids. Given that we just saw Hawthorn smash a team with forward line containing Franklin, Tippet, Reid and Goodes (handy 4th forward), it reinforces the view that building an A Grade midfield first makes more sense.

[Dockett 32 1,213]

I suppose you're right . Kick the bloody thing in there often enough and surely someone will kick the goals.

Cameron or Reid would be handy to support Dawes and young Hogan however.

[McQueen 17,862]

Will go out on a limb here with what has been said and what I have heard as late as this morning.

Dangerfield to Dees for pick 2 + Toumpas plus exchange of later picks

Shiel to Dees for pick 3 + possible player or exchange of later picks

And thats all folks!

Just popped me zipper.

[SaberFang 7,141]

I think Sydey and Hawthorn went about it differently, and the Hawks' game plan was easily more effective. Clarkson has basically turned his midfield into goalkickers, they have an amazing spread of players who go forward and kick goals.

Sydney, conversely, have pulled in as many key forward talls as they can and expect the midfielders to deliver them. The Bondi Billionaires are expected to do the rest.

I prefer the former, and clearly the grand final indicates which is more successful.

[Biffen 12,323]

I think Sydey and Hawthorn went about it differently, and the Hawks' game plan was easily more effective. Clarkson has basically turned his midfield into goalkickers, they have an amazing spread of players who go forward and kick goals.

Sydney, conversely, have pulled in as many key forward talls as they can and expect the midfielders to deliver them. The Bondi Billionaires are expected to do the rest.

I prefer the former, and clearly the grand final indicates which is more successful.

Thought Sydney looked top heavy yesterday.

Tippet Reid etc no good at ground level.

Lake and Gibson do a great job on superstars.

Edited September 28, 2014 by Biffen

[Jaded No More 57,774]

Hawthorn aren't exactly struggling for forward targets. Roughy and Gunston are better than anything we currently have.

We need key forwards.

Edited September 28, 2014 by Jaded