Nathan Bock suspended for "reckless" breach of betting code

[Range Rover 1,935]

2 week suspension, $10 grand fine for providing inside information to a mate that he would start a match at full forward.

AFL says it "wasn't intentional" despite the fact that someone won a motza on him kicking the first goal of the game.

Bock says it was a "careless conversation with his mate".

Soft, inconsistent response that will only encourage further incidents.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/bock-banned-for-leaking-information-that-led-to-successful-40000-bet/story-e6frf9jf-1226222227281

Edited December 14, 2011 by Range Rover

[biggestred 5,108]

Hardly consistent with huge penalties handed out in past.

[s-t-i-n-g-a 439]

He plays for an expansion club...they won't make him miss games.

[Sir Why You Little 37,052]

He plays for an expansion club...they won't make him miss games.

Yes if a victorian club was involved, it does make you wonder doesn't it.

[deeflog 679]

insider info happens every week across the AFL in my eyes

get rid of first goal betting and this all stops

[Rogue 585]

He plays for an expansion club...they won't make him miss games.

He's missing two games.

[DeeSpencer 25,723]

Who cares.

Horse racing is built around insider info. All this does is hurt bookmakers, since when do we care about them?

His actions had no influence on the outcome of the game, only on the bookmakers accounts.

Are the AFL ever going to reprimand bookmakers when they find out inside information and change their markets accordingly without informing punters. I doubt it.

[Arrow 1,257]

You're kidding me. Not a GC or Bock fan in the slightest but jeez give him a break.

The man has taken absolute 100% responsibility for his actions, fully backed the AFL stance on betting and stated how much he is behind the actions they are taking. Not only did he do that he also alerted authorities the weekend that the alleged offence occured. And you think he's hard done by.

What about Maxwell who took no responsibility, got no weeks and told no-one about his indiscretions until it was bought on him.

Think he specifically needs to be commended and at least the AFL is stepping in the right direction.

[Sir Why You Little 37,052]

Who cares.

Horse racing is built around insider info. All this does is hurt bookmakers, since when do we care about them?

His actions had no influence on the outcome of the game, only on the bookmakers accounts.

Are the AFL ever going to reprimand bookmakers when they find out inside information and change their markets accordingly without informing punters. I doubt it.

Yes they did as far as scores are concerned...if he had been smarter he should have kicked a point.

Betting is a Cancer on Sport..and must be stopped.

Should have fined him $50,000 and then players would learn once and for all.

Insider trading is not allowed either.

Edited December 14, 2011 by why you little

[Arrow 1,257]

Yes they did as far as scores are concerned...if he had been smarter he should have kicked a point.

Betting is a Cancer on Sport..and must be stopped.

Should have fined him $50,000 and then players would learn once and for all.

Insider trading is not allowed either.

Have you read the article WYL?

He didn't know his friend had put money on it- he simply realised the day after that something may have happened and thus informed the needed sources. Heath Shaw put a physical bet on, all Nathan has done has unfortunately mentioned he would be playing in the forward line. These days that is considered the wrong thing and a 2 match penalty was given.

You want to fine him 50,000 to make a statement. All well and good to make these huge statements but you're punishing a man's life for a slip of the tongue as opposed to a physical action he intentionally committed.

[s-t-i-n-g-a 439]

Thats a poor defence for a stupid action DL7.

After the fuss over maxwell and shaw it's indefensible.

The rules are pretty clear about these thing, the time of pleading ignorance has past.

[Range Rover 1,935]

He didn't know his friend had put money on it- he simply realised the day after that something may have happened and thus informed the needed sources.

So he says.

If this year's events have taught us anything, we should be erring on the side of skepticism when it comes to money and dodgy dealings involving players.

Edited December 14, 2011 by Range Rover

[monoccular 17,436]

HSC ENGLISH EXAM:

Consistency.......AFL...........put the two in a positively orientated paragraph.

REQUIRED ANSWER : admit that it is impossible.

[Redleg 40,976]

Does him playing in the forward line guarantee he kicks the first goal?

[rolly 149]

Thats a poor defence for a stupid action DL7.

After the fuss over maxwell and shaw it's indefensible.

The rules are pretty clear about these thing, the time of pleading ignorance has past.

what ACTION did he actually take?

the only ACTION he took was to effectively dob him and his mate in.

"An investigation found Bock broke the rules recklessly, but, importantly, he did not intend the information to be used for betting," Anderson said.

how can this be the case if he recieving a harsher penalty than the most undeserving captain in afl history? maxwell didn't miss games and the only reason i can come up with as to why would be the fact that the bet lost.

"Bock co-operated fully with investigation and the investigation team is absolutely satisfied he was honest at all times."- the same cannot be said of the 2 members of the filth brigade...this is a shocking, shocking decision which only serves to highlight a growing lack of consistancy within the afl.

Anderson said the cases were on the "same tier" but Bock's offences were worse because he told two people and one of them "was known to bet on AFL football from time to time"... 90% of people i know will have a punt "from time to time". they're not even close to being on the same tier and he certainly doesn't deserve to recieve a heavier punishment.

afl missed a chance here to give Bock a well done on his forthrightness and hoensty, what incentive is there to do the right thing now? not saying that players should be betting on themselves or encouraging people to do so, but i mean really...what did HE personally do wrong except have a casual conversation with friends and family...

EDIT- his only real mistake was to tell the authorites of a potential breach...can't see many more players coming forth if this is the treatment they recieve

Edited December 14, 2011 by rolly

[Curry & Beer 5,444]

Betting is a Cancer on Sport..and must be stopped.

not to mention a cancer on society in general.. anyone who knows someone who just hands their paycheck over every week will know what I mean

[Sir Why You Little 37,052]

Have you read the article WYL?

He didn't know his friend had put money on it- he simply realised the day after that something may have happened and thus informed the needed sources. Heath Shaw put a physical bet on, all Nathan has done has unfortunately mentioned he would be playing in the forward line. These days that is considered the wrong thing and a 2 match penalty was given.

You want to fine him 50,000 to make a statement. All well and good to make these huge statements but you're punishing a man's life for a slip of the tongue as opposed to a physical action he intentionally committed.

You believe all that do you??

The Group of Friends he was with all went and laid $$ on him kicking that first goal.....(I think he knew what telling these people would do) If not he is plain foolish.

The Nick Maxwell situation set the tone....and the first rule of law...."Ignorance is no excuse"

$50,000 fine would clean up betting straight away...

[Sir Why You Little 37,052]

what ACTION did he actually take?

the only ACTION he took was to effectively dob him and his mate in.

"An investigation found Bock broke the rules recklessly, but, importantly, he did not intend the information to be used for betting," Anderson said.

how can this be the case if he recieving a harsher penalty than the most undeserving captain in afl history? maxwell didn't miss games and the only reason i can come up with as to why would be the fact that the bet lost.

"Bock co-operated fully with investigation and the investigation team is absolutely satisfied he was honest at all times."- the same cannot be said of the 2 members of the filth brigade...this is a shocking, shocking decision which only serves to highlight a growing lack of consistancy within the afl.

Anderson said the cases were on the "same tier" but Bock's offences were worse because he told two people and one of them "was known to bet on AFL football from time to time"... 90% of people i know will have a punt "from time to time". they're not even close to being on the same tier and he certainly doesn't deserve to recieve a heavier punishment.

afl missed a chance here to give Bock a well done on his forthrightness and hoensty, what incentive is there to do the right thing now? not saying that players should be betting on themselves or encouraging people to do so, but i mean really...what did HE personally do wrong except have a casual conversation with friends and family...

EDIT- his only real mistake was to tell the authorites of a potential breach...can't see many more players coming forth if this is the treatment they recieve

What you do is.....Keep your mouth closed about your game before the ball is bounced....to everyone...You are being well paid as it is.

[Range Rover 1,935]

The real culprit is Andrew Demetriou, who sets the ridiculously pro-gambling tone of the sporting organization he fronts.

[Sir Why You Little 37,052]

The real culprit is Andrew Demetriou, who sets the ridiculously pro-gambling tone of the sporting organization he fronts.

I agree.

I feel sorry for Nathan but 10k is pocket money to these guys. It must be stopped dead.

Edited December 14, 2011 by why you little

[s-t-i-n-g-a 439]

Please refer back to the last line in my post.

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

Betting is a Cancer on Sport..and must be stopped.

Good. There goes the horse racing industry. This is far more complex issue than your one liners.

Should have fined him $50,000 and then players would learn once and for all.

Fat chance of that.

Shaw......Wallis......Bock......the list goes on.

Increasing fines will do nothing to counter player stupidity or lack of ethics.

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

The real culprit is Andrew Demetriou, who sets the ridiculously pro-gambling tone of the sporting organization he fronts.

The real culprits are actually elsewhere but the association of AFL with gambling odds on TV and Scoreboard is a scourge.

[Damo 3,362]

Bock was backed from $101 into $21. Thats a plunge in my book. His family was in court over different matters at the same time, which IMO shows It wasnt an accident. He was let off and if he had have been a Krakouer i wonder if the result may have been a fair bit different.

[old dee 23,801]

The real culprits are actually elsewhere but the association of AFL with gambling odds on TV and Scoreboard is a scourge.

Spot on RR

If you lie down with dogs don't be surprised if you wake up with fleas!