Jump to content

Food for thought....


Mallee Bull

Recommended Posts

From all of the media reports Bruce is most likely going to be on a single year contract with another club, along with a pay cut. This gets back to my original post. Boomer is happy to sign on, Bruce wasn't with us, but may with another club. Why? Is our FD not handling its dealings with our senior players as well as other clubs do theirs?

They are going to give him a second year trigger so hypothetically:

He could play the first 15 games and get 2012 automatically, then he could do his hammy be out for 5 come back and do it again ala Buckley (as per your previous example regarding Junior...).

So now, in this hypothetical situation, Hawthorn has $250/300k tied up in an injured 33 year old in 2012.

Is that what we would like to see at the Demons?

You get one year when you over 30 - why?

Because our talent derives from the 2007-2009 drafts.

30 year olds are 10 years older than our talent - why should we give them longer contracts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am still hoping Junior can be DB's runner next year (or one of them) that way he can still be a great leader.

Might even give a shephered Alistair Clarkson style.

5-6 weeks isn't unheard of. Grimes was gone for much longer than that.

It was a 1 week injury at first...a minor hamstring pull. It then went to 2 weeks then 3.....Oh Oh its out to six weeks. At 34, your body tells you...... Grimes injury was a full blown hanstring tear. It was far more serious than the one week niggle Junior had.

Fair comment rpfc on Bruce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but posts like this are just starting to do my head in. Aaaaaaaggggggghhhhhhhhhh.

There, that feels a bit better.

Hawthorn are desperate for a(nother) flag while they still have the Buddies etc. Our flag is some years down the track. Different situations so ... different needs and, suprise suprise, different approaches to contracts and list management.

In other words, just because Cam can get a contract with a second year trigger at another club, it doesn't mean that we handled the negotiations badly.

Phew.

Really good post... but I have a feeling some will still not get it.

It's hard when your judgement is clouded by emotion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting OP. Certainly.

The club, I imgaine, looks at every big call like the JMac and Bruce ones and considers the ramifications. They want to advertise themselves as a loyal club to any player that wishes to come here, which is a good reason to keep players who are a bit long in the tooth. But by the same tokenm they don't want to seem like a retirement home. Also... they set a theme with those big names you mention. The club makes a call and won't negotiate beyond the price they decide. It's a sound strategy. But it'll be interesting to see whether or not the end result will make us more desirable in the future... or perhaps less desirable in 5-10 years when we decline again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting OP. Certainly.

The club, I imgaine, looks at every big call like the JMac and Bruce ones and considers the ramifications. They want to advertise themselves as a loyal club to any player that wishes to come here, which is a good reason to keep players who are a bit long in the tooth. But by the same tokenm they don't want to seem like a retirement home. Also... they set a theme with those big names you mention. The club makes a call and won't negotiate beyond the price they decide. It's a sound strategy. But it'll be interesting to see whether or not the end result will make us more desirable in the future... or perhaps less desirable in 5-10 years when we decline again.

Some years ago, I heard Kevin Sheedy say that the seeds for the Baby Bombers premiership in 1993 were sown in the last round of 1991 when Terry Daniher and Simon Madden were brought back into the team for farewell games.......................... why? ............ because the kids saw that they were playing for a club which had "heart".

Now this might be a bit extreme ..... and we might all say that any heart Essendon has every had is a pretty sick one ..... but it does make a point. The past does influence the future .. and intangibles do count

Ideally you want the majority of your once-favourite sons to leave on good terms .Clearly that is not always possible .... but that is not to say that you shouldn't work towards it. The fall-out with Junior may have been inevitable - but I'm not convinced that we couldn't have worked things through more amicably with Bruce - even if that meant helping him get to another club in return for a draft pick - anything lower than pick #52 would have been a plus.

Good management means no nasty surprises - and Bruce's departure at the eleventh hour ( leaving us with a 7th round rookie pick) - certainly was a nasty surprise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideally you want the majority of your once-favourite sons to leave on good terms .Clearly that is not always possible .... but that is not to say that you shouldn't work towards it. The fall-out with Junior may have been inevitable - but I'm not convinced that we couldn't have worked things through more amicably with Bruce - even if that meant helping him get to another club in return for a draft pick - anything lower than pick #52 would have been a plus.

Getting back to Old's incredible question - what would you have said if we traded Bruce for pick 45?

What if we did that trade when he hadn't made up his mind yet?

What would the people think then about the way we treat our players?

Stop applying hindsight to decision - it is metaphysical impossibility, intellectual wankery, and a waste of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Getting back to Old's incredible question - what would you have said if we traded Bruce for pick 45?

What if we did that trade when he hadn't made up his mind yet?

What would the people think then about the way we treat our players?

Stop applying hindsight to decision - it is metaphysical impossibility, intellectual wankery, and a waste of time.

Thank-you for your thoughtful contribution to the discussion.

I may not have been thrilled with pick 45 .... but the club would have been better off than it is now. I presume you would have been stoked !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank-you for your thoughtful contribution to the discussion.

I may not have been thrilled with pick 45 .... but the club would have been better off than it is now. I presume you would have been stoked !

It is thoughtful...

I assume you are being sarcastic?

I would have wondered why we were trading a player against his will, out of thin air, for pointless return.

I would have preferred he stay, like the club.

But I am not about to apply what we know now to a decision during trade week that would have been incongruous and not understandable then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may not have been thrilled with pick 45 .... but the club would have been better off than it is now. I presume you would have been stoked !

Yes, but the point is, we would not know what we know now, i.e. we would not have known that the alternative was Bruce walking. On face value it would appear that we traded Bruce for pick 45 (or whatever) for no reason whatsoever. The assumption would be that the alternative was signing him - nobody ever really assumes that a player is going to walk (heck, I certainly didn't, even with the massive delay in his dealings). So the great unwashed would not realise that that that was actually the best outcome even though it was. Those who are disappointed with this outcome would still have been disappointed with that one, and those who are pleased with this outcome would still be pleased with that one.

As rpfc says; it makes no sense apply 20-20 hindsight to these situations unless you're willing to discount the knowledge you already know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but the point is, we would not know what we know now, i.e. we would not have known that the alternative was Bruce walking. On face value it would appear that we traded Bruce for pick 45 (or whatever) for no reason whatsoever. The assumption would be that the alternative was signing him - nobody ever really assumes that a player is going to walk (heck, I certainly didn't, even with the massive delay in his dealings). So the great unwashed would not realise that that that was actually the best outcome even though it was. Those who are disappointed with this outcome would still have been disappointed with that one, and those who are pleased with this outcome would still be pleased with that one.

As rpfc says; it makes no sense apply 20-20 hindsight to these situations unless you're willing to discount the knowledge you already know.

and all this self-flagellation, wasted emotions and histrionics is becoming very passe

its all done, we will never know all the true story and the nuances etc

bottom line is there is no great damage to our objectives and future

cam missed an opportunity to be a one-club player which in time i think he may regret. big deal.

I for one am sick of this topic, what else is there to say? Can we move on to drafting and other issues?

I suspect this plea will be ignored and the CB threads will continue to thrive for 1,000s of more posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Good management means no nasty surprises - and Bruce's departure at the eleventh hour ( leaving us with a 7th round rookie pick) - certainly was a nasty surprise

You don't know that. Nor do I. For us, yes, a suprise. But for the club?

As for this trade talk, Cam was pretty well at the end of his contract. The chances of getting a (decent) trade would have been pretty slim given he could always do what he's just done. Walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't know that. Nor do I. For us, yes, a suprise. But for the club?

As for this trade talk, Cam was pretty well at the end of his contract. The chances of getting a (decent) trade would have been pretty slim given he could always do what he's just done. Walk.

Bruce didn't go to China, i am guessing but i think the club had a fair idea what was going on. It just took a while to reach us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Canberra

Get a girlfriend/boyfriend or you will hate the place.

RE: Rogue & Other Clubs Fans

Yes, but when there is a choice between inward navel gazing and handwringing and stubborn, arrogant defiance, Melbourne supporters love to go the first port of call.

I realise I am navel gazing, but it's the good type of self-reflection.

It's the kind that doesn't blame AFL conspiracies, our 'victim status', or our lot in life, for all the things we believe 'are being done to us.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Canberra

Get a girlfriend/boyfriend or you will hate the place.

RE: Rogue & Other Clubs Fans

Yes, but when there is a choice between inward navel gazing and handwringing and stubborn, arrogant defiance, Melbourne supporters love to go the first port of call.

I realise I am navel gazing, but it's the good type of self-reflection.

It's the kind that doesn't blame AFL conspiracies, our 'victim status', or our lot in life, for all the things we believe 'are being done to us.'

Oh dear, How maudlin. I feel I have walked over someone's grave.

But don't worry, I have consulted my medico friend.

There is a cure! You need a Premiership transplant within the next 5 years. He guarantees it will fix everything.

Now where did I put that bottle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    EASYBEATS by Meggs

    A beautiful sunny Friday afternoon, with a light breeze and a strong Windy Hill crowd set the scene, inviting one team to seize the day and take the important four points on offer. For the Demons it was not a good Friday, easily beaten by an all-time largest losing margin of 65 points.   Essendon threw themselves into action today, winning most of the contests and had three early goals with Daria Bannister on fire.  In contrast the Demons were dropping marks, hesitant in close and comm

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 4

    DEFUSE THE BOMBERS by Meggs

    Last Saturday’s crushing loss to Fremantle, after being three goals ahead at three quarter time, should be motivation enough to bounce back for this very winnable Round 5 clash at Windy Hill. A first-time venue for the Melbourne AFLW team, this should be a familiar suburban, windy, footy environment for the players.   Essendon were brave and competitive last week against ladder leader Adelaide at Sturt’s home ground. A familiar name, Maddison Gay, was the Bombers best player with

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 33

    BLOW THE SIREN by Meggs

    Fremantle hosted the Demons on a sunny 20-degree Saturdayafternoon winning the toss and electing to defend in the first quarter against the 3-goal breeze favouring the Parry Street end. There was method here, as this would give the comeback queens, the Dockers, last use of the breeze. The Melbourne Coach had promised an improved performance, and we did start better than previous weeks, winning the ball out of the middle, using the breeze advantage and connecting to the forwards. 

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    GETAWAY by Meggs

    Calling all fit players. Expect every available Melbourne player to board the Virgin cross-continent flight to Perth for this Round 4 clash on Saturday afternoon at Fremantle Oval. It promises to be keenly contested, though Fremantle is the bookies clear favourite.  If we lose, finals could be remoter than Rottnest Island especially following on from the Dees 50-point dismantlement by North Melbourne last Sunday.  There are 8 remaining matches, over the next 7 weeks.  To Meggs’

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    DRUBBING by Meggs

    With Casey Fields basking in sunshine, an enthusiastic throng of young Demons fans formed a guard of honour for the evergreen and much admired 75-gamer Paxy Paxman. As the home team ran out to play, Paxy’s banner promised that the Demons would bounce back from last week’s loss to Brisbane and reign supreme.   Disappointingly, the Kangaroos dominated the match to win by 50 points, but our Paxy certainly did her bit.  She was clearly our best player, sweeping well in defence.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 4

    GARNER STRENGTH by Meggs

    In keeping with our tough draw theme, Week 3 sees Melbourne take on flag favourites, North Melbourne, at Casey Fields this Sunday at 1:05pm.  The weather forecast looks dry, a coolish 14 degrees and will be characteristically gusty.  Remember when Casey Fields was considered our fortress?  The Demons have lost two of their past three matches at the Field of Dreams, so opposition teams commute down the Princes Highway with more optimism these days.  The Dees held the highe

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    ALLY’S FIELDS by Meggs

    It was a sunny morning at Casey Fields, as Demon supporters young and old formed a guard of honour for fan favourite and 50-gamer Alyssa Bannan.  Banno’s banner stated the speedster was the ‘fastest 50 games’ by an AFLW player ever.   For Dees supporters, today was not our day and unfortunately not for Banno either. A couple of opportunities emerged for our number 6 but alas there was no sizzle.   Brisbane atoned for last week’s record loss to North Melbourne, comprehensively out

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    GOOD MORNING by Meggs

    If you are driving or training it to Cranbourne on Saturday, don’t forget to set your alarm clock. The Melbourne Demons play the reigning premiers Brisbane Lions at Casey Fields this Saturday, with the bounce of the ball at 11:05am.  Yes, that’s AM.   The AFLW fixture shows deference to the AFL men’s finals games.  So, for the men it’s good afternoon and good evening and for the women it’s good morning.     The Lions were wounded last week by 44 points, their highest ever los

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 3

    HORE ON FIRE by Meggs

    The 40,000 seat $319 million redeveloped Kardinia Park Stadium was nowhere near capacity last night but the strong, noisy contingent of Melbourne supporters led by the DeeArmy journeyed to Geelong to witness a high-quality battle between two of the best teams in AFLW.   The Cats entered the arena to the blasting sounds of Zombie Nation and made a hot start kicking the first 2 goals. They brought tremendous forward half pressure, and our newly renovated defensive unit looked shaky.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 11
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...