Jump to content

TheoX

Members
  • Content Count

    1,574
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by TheoX

  1. Go to that SC facebook page and click the link from there, you'll get the full article. 2 of the reasons are our 18yo draftees and Bennell, so they're reaching for reasons lol.
  2. Surely Pickett won't be in our best 22, he barely impacted games at U18 level, unlikely he will do much at AFL level in his first year you'd think. Let him get up to standard at Casey for a couple of years.
  3. Isn't it their job to know who's interested in which players? Every club knew exactly who we were taking with 3 and 10, and everyone knew about our interest in Rivers.
  4. Langdon cancels out frost speedwise, thought tomlinson was more an endurance runner than quick. Avb will be huge if he stays fit agreed, but a raw ruck and 67kg guy that barely gets a touch and rarely kicks goals at u18 lvl are unlikely to help our fwd line next year. Bennell will be a bonus if he gets in the park but we cant expect too much from him. Heres hoping for no injuries😄
  5. Not much if at all. None of speed, kicking skills or a nonexistent forward line have been addressed. Better hope for a blessed run with injury otherwise norf might be getting pick 1😂
  6. Massive reach, hed better be bloody good since weve given up a likely top 4 pick for him.
  7. Good thing we only gave preuss a 4 year deal then.😜
  8. So, a tiny small forward, even by small forward standards, who barely gets a touch and doesn't kick many goals? Surely we should just take the best available at 10 then get the best small forward at 28.
  9. Feels like Lucas Cook all over again. Massive reach.
  10. "Melbourne is expected to call out West Australian ruckman Luke Jackson’s name with Pick 3" [censored] hope not.
  11. We have no forward line, doubt this reject will help.
  12. They simply don't have enough draft pick currency to get pick 3 off us. Pick 6 and their first next year which will be in the 20s most likely is nowhere near enough for the benefit they would get and the opportunity we would miss. They had their chance during trade period to cough up a decent player to satisfy us, but refused to. If we think Green is the 3rd best player in the draft we will bid on him. Looks like he'd be in contention for no1 if he weren't an academy player.
  13. We've given up a likely 2020 top4 pick, 26 and 50 for pick 8. Would have to be a pretty good deal for us to part with it you'd think.
  14. TheoX

    Jack Martin

    If he becomes a FA (think hed have been at gc long enough, or maybe he'd need 2 more) after that year it'd be well worth the compo pick they'd get if he left to Carltank. Probably band 1 the way the AFL work.
  15. What he said is pretty valid. May and Lever are huge mistakes at this stage. Surprised he didn't mention the bizzare decision to trade a likely top4 pick plus valuable change for pick 8.
  16. Great news, though that's a pretty long contract, usually those 5+ year deals go to top shelf players.
  17. Lol. I thought [censored] teams get soft draws usually. Looks like the AFL want north to get pick1 next year.
  18. GC didn't offer him a contract, I wouldn't say GC rejects nominating us makes us a destination club.
  19. This is the club that gave KK, with his major concussion issues, a 3 year contract. Anything's possible from us.
  20. Meh, don't need a data analyst to tell us we're a basketcase.
  21. Short and sounds like hes a poor kick. No thanks.
  22. Weightman seems a Lucas Cook-esque reach for needs at 8. Wouldve been a chance to get him at 26 you'd think. Hope we go Kemp if he's there.
  23. It looks absolutely insane. I thought the AFL could block trades that were so lopsided with points value. If we win the flag north is still 400+ pts ahead. Completely [censored].
×
×
  • Create New...