Jump to content

  • Latest Podcast: Round 09 vs Carlton



Sign in to follow this  
joeboy

My 3 word player analysis V Brisbane

Recommended Posts

Jetta - livelier but careless 

Lever - just a game

Hibberd - consistently gave drive

Hunt - lacking customary drive

McDonald - continued good form

Jones - indefatigable and inspiring 

Gawn - dominant from centre

Oliver - classy and consistent 

Vince - not a tagger

Salem - ineffective on ball

Neal-Bullen - had little impact 

Lewis - almost always solid

Petracca - classy and impressive 

Pedersen - was rarely sighted

Harmes - tough and effective 

Fritsch - classy and brave

Garlett - perfect forward’s game

Hogan - 3 great quarters

Wagner - didn’t imbue confidence 

Bugg - tried but failed

Tyson - was mostly reliable

Melksham - was almost effective 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hunt : Cannot defend

Lever : Cannot hold ball

Wagner : Can tackle !!!!

Jeffy : Magnificent

Clarrie : Best player in AFL under 21

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Room for improvement 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bugg- only kicks points!

He is not the least bit dangerous around goal. Honestly his shot conversion has to be the worst on the list.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad joeboy, but I disagree on Vince.  Zorko may have got off the leash a little in the second half but he completely shut him out of the game in the first half.  He generally limited his influence and did a good job.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Martin evened things up with Gawn, Lewis was a liability, but otherwise agree.

Hunt is worrying not sure what his problem is. Hasn’t gone on with it this season. 

If we didn’t have Oliver in the guts I wonder if we would win a game. And that is a worry. We need Viney back as soon as. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Jetta - livelier but careless 

Lever - just a game

Hibberd - consistently gave drive

Hunt - lacking customary drive

McDonald - continued good form

Jones - indefatigable and inspiring 

Gawn - dominant from centre

Oliver - classy and consistent 

Vince - not a tagger

Salem - ineffective on ball

Neal-Bullen - had little impact 

Lewis - almost always solid

Petracca - classy and impressive 

Pedersen - was rarely sighted

Harmes - tough and effective 

Fritsch - classy and brave

Garlett - perfect forward’s game

Hogan - 3 great quarters

Wagner - didn’t imbue confidence 

Bugg - tried but failed

Tyson - was mostly reliable

Melksham - was almost effective 

 

Jetta - very badly beaten 

Lever - OMac 2016

Hibberd - consistently gave drive (tick)

Hunt - hacking ball consistently

McDonald - continued good form (tick)

Jones - indefatigable and inspiring (tick)

Gawn - nullified their bloke

Oliver - classy and consistent (tick)

Vince - brave as usual

Salem - ineffective on ball (tick)

Neal-Bullen - doesn't do enough

Lewis - sometimes solid defender

Petracca - classy and impressive (tick)

Pedersen - can't hold marks

Harmes - lost out there

Fritsch - early days yet

Garlett - good forward’s game

Hogan - 3 great quarters (tick)

Wagner - improved in week 

Bugg - same old Bugg

Tyson - goes missing often

Melksham - not very effective 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Jetta - very badly beaten 

Lever - OMac 2016

Hibberd - consistently gave drive (tick)

Hunt - hacking ball consistently

McDonald - continued good form (tick)

Jones - indefatigable and inspiring (tick)

Gawn - nullified their bloke

Oliver - classy and consistent (tick)

Vince - brave as usual

Salem - ineffective on ball (tick)

Neal-Bullen - doesn't do enough

Lewis - sometimes solid defender

Petracca - classy and impressive (tick)

Pedersen - can't hold marks

Harmes - lost out there

Fritsch - early days yet

Garlett - good forward’s game

Hogan - 3 great quarters (tick)

Wagner - improved in week 

Bugg - same old Bugg

Tyson - goes missing often

Melksham - not very effective 

What is all that s love for Jones?  He was hopeless 90% of the time.  Handballs like a headless chook, rushes and kicks to really poor options.  He did 2 good things, and about 20 bad.

jetta - spot on.  He was thrashed by all comers, gave cheapie frees, outpositioned and lost his man too easily.

a few of these guys should be looking over their shoulders after that performance.

looking like a slightly above average middle table team ATM

Edited by buck_nekkid
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

What is all that s love for Jones?  He was hopeless 90% of the time.  Handballs like a headless chook, rushes and kicks to really poor options.  He did 2 good things, and about 20 bad.

jetta - spot on.  He was thrashed by all comers, gave cheapie frees, outpositioned and lost his man too easily.

a few of these guys should be looking over their shoulders after that performance.

looking like a slightly above average middle table team ATM

Jones = maybe you're right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dimmy said:

Hunt : Cannot defend

Lever : Cannot hold ball

Wagner : Can tackle !!!!

Jeffy : Magnificent

Clarrie : Best player in AFL under 21

is Wagner a 'run-with' possibility, dimmy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lewis... career almost over

Bugg.. not much skill

Harmes.. drinks own bathwater

Lever.. JUST A PLAYER

Jetta ... Is he ill??

TOO MANY DEES........... JUST CANT PLAY!!

 

  • Shocked 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a few good players who are out of form. Off the top of my head Lever, Hunt, Jetta and Salem, have all looked a bit off in the first 2 games.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Salem looked great in the firat half. Clean every time, tackles well, chased hard. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, 64" said:

We definitely paid overs for lever.

He will be good for us. We are not using him as the Crows did. He is picking up a key forward which stops him sweeping. Needs Frost and Oscar to take key forwards and then he can sweep and float off his nan a bit. 

His passing from the back will set up play for us. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, 64" said:

We definitely paid overs for lever.

Classic Demonland.  If someone isn't dominating inside the first 2 games of arriving at the club then he's no good, we paid overs and our FD are a joke.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, DV8 said:

is Wagner a 'run-with' possibility, dimmy?

Agree, he should be running with Casey!

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would like to add Goodwin to these wonderful assessments:

After two rounds mine is:

"Wasting the list"

It is obvious we have a decent list but we are simply not realising the potential of so many players.

Salem is a good example and Petracca could be so much better just to name two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brayshaw : Missed the plane.

Yeh, Wagner could be a "stopper"as lond as when he gets it somebody responsible is in the area . Buit  a real trier

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with Buck Nekkid re Jones.

Check him on the replay : he coughs it up quite a bit, is messy by hand and 50/50 by foot. Nice to see him snag a couple of goals last night - he doesn't kick all that many.

Which takes me on to Kent. I wouldn't be considering him. Oppo teams don't fear him because he tackles like Jack Watts and doesn't hurt them on the scoreboard. Seriously. He just does not kick goals; all he has is leg speed. I think of  Sam Blease as a comparison - lightning fast but not an asset.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, 64" said:

We definitely paid overs for lever.

Early days.... but not promising thus far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Social Media



    • Recently Browsing   0 members

      No registered users viewing this page.

    ×